Non-resection and resection techniques for correcting type II mitral insufficiency: comparison of long-term results
https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2026-6593
EDN: NGOSAK
Abstract
Aim: To compare the long-term results reconstructive non-resection and resection techniques in mitral valve prolapse.
Material and methods: 75 adult patients – 60 patients in non-resection techniques group (mean age 57 (49;64) years, 21 female) and 15 patients in resection technique group (mean age 57 (48;67) years, 4 female) with severe degenerative mitral regurgitation (ERO 43,5 (31;50) mm2) underwent mitral valve repair – were included in the retrospective study. Most of patients (96%) were in NYHA class II-III before surgery. Propensity score matching was performed due to retrospective study type. Mean follow-up period was 8,2 (±2,5) year. Ultrasound system Vivid E95 (GE Healthcare) with EchoPAC (version 204) was used for our investigation.
Results: Both groups had comparable ultrasound parameters of mitral leaflets and annulus with bigger ring size implantation tendency in non-resection group (32 ± 1,7 mm versus 30,8 ± 1,8 mm, р=0,07). Also the groups were comparable in volume and functional characteristics of left ventricle. However, there was a difference between groups in left atrial strain during cardiac cycle: 22,5 (13;26)% versus 14,5 (12;16)% in reservoir phase, р=0,04; -13,5 (-10;-19)% versus -10 (-9;-13)% in conduit phase, р=0,03; -6,5 (-3;-10)% versus -4 (-2;-6)% in contractile phase, р=0,04 in non-resection group and resection group accordingly. Statistically significant difference was detected in non-planar angle (171 (164;177) deg. – 162 (158;169) deg., р=0,02) and cardiac index (4,2 (3,7;4,7) l/min/m2 – 3,8 (3,4;4,1) l/min/m2, р=0,03). Patients in both groups had not recurrent MR more than 2 degree (38,6% with MR 1 degree, 5% with MR 2 degree).
Conclusion: Non-resection and resection reconstructive techniques are comparable in postoperative parameters of mitral leaflets, annulus and left ventricle with bigger ring size implantation tendency in non-resection group, but there are differences between groups in left atrial strain, non-planar angle, cardiac index in long-term period. However, larger studies are still needed.
Conflict of interest: Authors have nothing to disclose with regard to commercial support.
Identifying number of the investigation: The investigation has identifying number NCT03674593 on ClinicalTrials.com.
About the Authors
A. N. ZhilinaRussian Federation
Post-graduate student, Cardiovascular Surgeon, Department of Cardiosurgery №1
V. V. Evtushenko
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Med.), Cardiovascular Surgeon, Department of Cardiosurgery №1
N. N. Sviazova
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Med.), Sonologist of the Cardiology Department №2
E. N. Pavlyukova
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Research Department of Radiology and Instrumental Diagnostics
A. V. Evtushenko
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Med.), Head Physician of Tomsk Regional Clinical Hospital
References
1. Chen S, Sari CR, Gao H, et al. Mechanical and morphometric study of mitral valve chordae tendineae and related papillary muscle. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020 Nov;111:104011. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104011. Epub 2020 Jul 30. PMID: 32835989.
2. Evtushenko V.V., Zhilina A.N., Pavlyukova E.N., et al. Non-resection techniques for correcting type II mitral regurgitation by A. Carpentier. Siberian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2025;40(1):103-109. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2025-40-1-103-109
3. Popa MO, Irimia AM, Papagheorghe MN, et al. The mechanisms, diagnosis and management of mitral regurgitation in mitral valve prolapse and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Discoveries (Craiova). 2016 Jun 30;4(2):e61. doi: 10.15190/d.2016.8. PMID: 32309580; PMCID: PMC7159827.
4. Sá MP, Cavalcanti LRP, Van den Eynde J, et al. Respect versus resect approaches for mitral valve repair: A study-level meta-analysis. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2023 May;33(4):225-239. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2022.01.005. Epub 2022 Jan 18. PMID: 35051591.
5. Savic V, Pozzoli A, Gülmez G, et al. Transcatheter mitral valve chord repair. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Nov;7(6):731-740. doi: 10.21037/acs.2018.09.09. PMID: 30598886; PMCID: PMC6288217.
6. Razavi SE, Talebi A. Comparative modeling of the mitral valve in normal and prolapse conditions. Bioimpacts. 2023;13(4):323-332. doi: 10.34172/bi.2023.24097. Epub 2023 Jan 7. PMID: 37645030; PMCID: PMC10460767.
7. Alekhin M.N., Kalinin A.O. Value of indicators of longitudinal deformation of the left atrium in patients with chronic heart failure. Modern Functional Diagnostics (4). 2020;(32):24-29. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2020-32-24-29
8. Kim HM, Cho GY, Hwang IC, et al. Myocardial Strain in Prediction of Outcomes After Surgery for Severe Mitral Regurgitation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Sep;11(9):1235-1244. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.03.016. Epub 2018 May 16. PMID: 29778855.
9. Hiemstra YL, Tomsic A, van Wijngaarden SE, et al. Prognostic Value of Global Longitudinal Strain and Etiology After Surgery for Primary Mitral Regurgitation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Feb;13(2 Pt 2):577-585. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.03.024. Epub 2019 Jun 12. PMID: 31202761.
10. Alekhin M.N. Mechanical dispersion of peak longitudinal strain of the left ventricle in mechanical dissynchrony assessment by speckle-tracking echocardiography. Ultrasound and Functional Diagnostics. 2022; 2: 86–104. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0771-2022-2-86-104
11. Golukhova E. Z., Bulaeva N. I., Mrikaev D. V., et al. Evaluation of left atrial strain using speckle-tracking echocardiography to predict postoperative atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2023;28(7):5349. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2023-5349
12. Khan MS, Memon MM, Murad MH, Vaduganathan M, Greene SJ, Hall M, Triposkiadis F, Lam CSP, Shah AM, Butler J, Shah SJ. Left atrial function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Heart Fail. 2020 Mar;22(3):472-485. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1643. Epub 2020 Jan 9. PMID: 31919960.
13. Nielsen AB, Skaarup KG, Hauser R, et al. Normal values and reference ranges for left atrial strain by speckle-tracking echocardiography: the Copenhagen City Heart Study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Dec 18;23(1):42-51. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeab201. PMID: 34632487.
14. van Wijngaarden SE, Kamperidis V, Al-Amri I, et al. Effects of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair With MitraClip on Left Ventricular and Atrial Hemodynamic Load and Myocardial Wall Stress. J Card Fail. 2018 Mar;24(3):137-145. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.12.008. Epub 2017 Dec 29. PMID: 29292112.
Review
For citations:
Zhilina A.N., Evtushenko V.V., Sviazova N.N., Pavlyukova E.N., Evtushenko A.V. Non-resection and resection techniques for correcting type II mitral insufficiency: comparison of long-term results. Russian Journal of Cardiology. :6593. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2026-6593. EDN: NGOSAK
JATS XML







































