Preview

Russian Journal of Cardiology

Advanced search

IMPORTANCE AND CORRECTNESS OF THE TERM “ANAEROBIC THRESHOLD”. THRESHOLD CHANGES OF COMPENSATORY AND ADAPTIVE BODY REACTIONS IN INCREASING PHYSICAL EXERTION

https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2014-11-19-24

Abstract

A distinction of the physical exertion into phases is necessary for on-time decisionmaking of the correct clinical decisions in medicine and for evaluation of the level ofsportsmen professional preparedness in sport medicine.
Aim. 1) To reveal the consequence of compensatory reactions in human bodyduring increasing physical exertion (PE). 2) To evaluate correctness of the term“anaerobic threshold”.
Material and methods. Totally 28 triathletes included and 35 healthy non-trained individuals underwent cardiorespiratory test on treadmill using equipment “Oxycon Pro” by Jager, Germany. Participants were instructed to reach maximum effort.Physiological stages of compensatory mechanisms involvement during PE wereevaluated by lactate measurements, pH and HCO in venous blood and gasexchange shifts.
Results. By the results of the current study we distinguished four main physiologic stages of PE. The first physiological stage is a threshold break in lactate level — lactate threshold. The second — beginning of pH decrease in venous blood — pH-threshold. The third physiologic stage — point of respiratory compensation. The fourth stage relates to the moment of PE when aerobicmetabolism is at “apogee” and the increase of energy production by aerobic pathway is not further possible – aerobis limit. The term “anaerobic threshold” is not relevant to any of these stages.
Conclusion. 1. According to the results of the study it is possible to distinguish fourphysiologic stages that appear during increasing PE: lactate threshold, pHthreshold,point of respiratory compensation and aerobic limit. 2. The term“anaerobic threshold” is not correct and does not reflect changes of physiologic processes in the human body during physical exertion.

About the Authors

T. A. Lelyavina
Federal Centre of the Heart, Blood and Endocrinology n.a. V. A. Almazov, SaintPetersburg
Russian Federation


M. Yu. Sitnikova
Federal Centre of the Heart, Blood and Endocrinology n.a. V. A. Almazov, SaintPetersburg
Russian Federation


A. V. Berezina
Federal Centre of the Heart, Blood and Endocrinology n.a. V. A. Almazov, SaintPetersburg
Russian Federation


E. V. Shlyakhto
Federal Centre of the Heart, Blood and Endocrinology n.a. V. A. Almazov, SaintPetersburg
Russian Federation


References

1. Wasserman K, Beaver WL, Whipp BJ. A New Method for Detecting Anaerobic Threshold by Gas Exchange. Journal of Applied Physiology 1986; 60 (6): 2020-7.

2. Grippy MA. Pathophysiology of Lungs. Moscow.: Izdatel’stvo BINOM; 2005. Russian (Гриппи М. А. “Патофизиология легких”. Москва: издательство БИНОМ; 2005.)

3. Lacour JR. Muscle activity and energy expenditure. Revue Respiratory 2011; 28(10):1278-92.

4. Howard L, Grocott MPW, Naeije R, et al. Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing. Pulmonary Medicine, vol. 2012; Article ID 564134, 3 pages, 2012.doi:10.1155/2012/564134.

5. Guazzi M, Arena R. New clinical cardiopulmonary exercise testing joint statement from the European Society of Cardiology and American Heart Association. European Heart Journal 2012;33(21): 2627-8.

6. Bertuzzi R., Nascimento E., Urso R. et al. Energy system contributions during incremental exercise test. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 2013; 12(3): 454-60.

7. American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians ATS/ACCP Statement on Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing. American Journal Respiratory Care Medicine 2003;167: 211-77.

8. Guazzi M, Adams V, Conraads V, et al. Clinical Recommendations for Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Data Assessment in Specific Patient Populations. Circulation. 2012; 126: 2261-74.

9. Geir S, Robstad B, Skjnsberg O, et al. Respiratory gas exchange indices for estimating the threshold. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 2005; 4: 29-36.

10. Gary J, Ross A, Sietsema K, et al. Clinician’s Guide to Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Adults: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2010; 122: 191-225.

11. Mezzania A, Agostonib P, Cohen-Solald A, et al. Standards for the use of cardiopulmonary exercise testing for the functional evaluation of cardiac patients: a report from the Exercise Physiology Section of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation 2009;16: 249-67.

12. Fujimoto N, Prasad A, Hastings J, et al. Cardiovascular effects of 1 year of progressive endurance exercise training in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. American Heart Journal 2012; 164(6): 869-77.

13. Ross A, Myers J, Guazzi M, et al. Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Is a Core Assessment for Patients With Heart Failure. Congestive Heart Failure 2011; 17 (3): 115-9.

14. Stickland M, Butcher S, Marciniuk D, et al. Assessing Exercise Limitation Using Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing. Pulmonary Medicine 2012; 2012: 113.

15. Piotrowicz E. Cardiac rehabilitation can be effective in all stable patients. Cardiology J 2011; 18(6): 607-9.


Review

For citations:


Lelyavina T.A., Sitnikova M.Yu., Berezina A.V., Shlyakhto E.V. IMPORTANCE AND CORRECTNESS OF THE TERM “ANAEROBIC THRESHOLD”. THRESHOLD CHANGES OF COMPENSATORY AND ADAPTIVE BODY REACTIONS IN INCREASING PHYSICAL EXERTION. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2014;(11):19-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2014-11-19-24

Views: 949


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1560-4071 (Print)
ISSN 2618-7620 (Online)