Standard transthoracic echocardiography. Guidelines 2024
https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2025-6271
EDN: TNLDFN
Abstract
Russian Society of Cardiology (RSC)
With the participation of: Medical Research and Educational Center of Lomonosov Moscow State University (Moscow), Chazov National Medical Research Center of Cardiology (Moscow), Bakulev National Medical Research Center of Cardiovascular Surgery (Moscow), Almazov National Medical Research Center (St. Petersburg), Meshalkin National Medical Research Center (Novosibirsk), Cardiology Research Institute of Tomsk National Medical Research Center (Tomsk), Tyumen Cardiology Research Center of Tomsk National Medical Research Center (Tyumen), Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (Moscow), Kazan State Medical Academy (Kazan), Federal Center for Cardiovascular Surgery (Khabarovsk)
About the Authors
S. T. MatskeplishviliRussian Federation
Moscow
Competing Interests:
Task Force members declared no financial support/conflicts of interest. If conflicts of interest were reported, the member(s) of the working group was (were) excluded from the discussion of the sections related to the area of conflict of interest
M. A. Saidova
Russian Federation
Moscow
Competing Interests:
Task Force members declared no financial support/conflicts of interest. If conflicts of interest were reported, the member(s) of the working group was (were) excluded from the discussion of the sections related to the area of conflict of interest
M. Yu. Mironenko
Russian Federation
Moscow
Competing Interests:
Task Force members declared no financial support/conflicts of interest. If conflicts of interest were reported, the member(s) of the working group was (were) excluded from the discussion of the sections related to the area of conflict of interest
A. F. Safarova
Russian Federation
Moscow
Competing Interests:
Task Force members declared no financial support/conflicts of interest. If conflicts of interest were reported, the member(s) of the working group was (were) excluded from the discussion of the sections related to the area of conflict of interest
E. N. Pavlyukova
Russian Federation
Novosibirsk
Competing Interests:
Task Force members declared no financial support/conflicts of interest. If conflicts of interest were reported, the member(s) of the working group was (were) excluded from the discussion of the sections related to the area of conflict of interest
A. A. Boshchenko
Russian Federation
Tomsk
Competing Interests:
Task Force members declared no financial support/conflicts of interest. If conflicts of interest were reported, the member(s) of the working group was (were) excluded from the discussion of the sections related to the area of conflict of interest
E. I. Yaroslavskaya
Russian Federation
Tyumen
Competing Interests:
Task Force members declared no financial support/conflicts of interest. If conflicts of interest were reported, the member(s) of the working group was (were) excluded from the discussion of the sections related to the area of conflict of interest
S. Yu. Akhunova
Russian Federation
Kazan
Competing Interests:
Task Force members declared no financial support/conflicts of interest. If conflicts of interest were reported, the member(s) of the working group was (were) excluded from the discussion of the sections related to the area of conflict of interest
V. I. Skidan
Russian Federation
Khabarovsk
Competing Interests:
Task Force members declared no financial support/conflicts of interest. If conflicts of interest were reported, the member(s) of the working group was (were) excluded from the discussion of the sections related to the area of conflict of interest
O. B. Irtyuga
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
Competing Interests:
Task Force members declared no financial support/conflicts of interest. If conflicts of interest were reported, the member(s) of the working group was (were) excluded from the discussion of the sections related to the area of conflict of interest
A. V. Kozlenok
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
Competing Interests:
Task Force members declared no financial support/conflicts of interest. If conflicts of interest were reported, the member(s) of the working group was (were) excluded from the discussion of the sections related to the area of conflict of interest
D. N. Fedorova
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
Competing Interests:
Task Force members declared no financial support/conflicts of interest. If conflicts of interest were reported, the member(s) of the working group was (were) excluded from the discussion of the sections related to the area of conflict of interest
References
1. Mitchell C, Rahko PS, Blauwet LA, et al. Guidelines for Performing a Comprehensive Transthoracic Echocardiographic Examination in Adults: Recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019;32(1):1-64. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2018.06.004.
2. Steeds RP, Garbi M, Cardim N, et al. EACVI appropriateness criteria for the use of transthoracic echocardiography in adults: a report of literature and current practice review. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18(11):1191-204. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jew333.
3. Galderisi M, Cosyns B, Edvardsen T, et al. Standardization of adult transthoracic echocardiography reporting in agreement with recent chamber quantification, diastolic function, and heart valve disease recommendations: an expert consensus document of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18(12):1301-10. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jex244.
4. Robinson S, Rana B, Oxborough D, et al. A practical guideline for performing a comprehensive transthoracic echocardiogram in adults: the British Society of Echocardiography minimum dataset. Echo Res Pract. 2020;7(4):G59-G93. doi:10.1530/ERP-20-0026.
5. Alekhin MN, Bartosh-Zelenaya SYu, Beresten NF, et al. Standardization of transthoracic echocardiography in adults: consensus of experts from the Russian Association of Ultrasound Diagnostics Specialists in Medicine (RASUDM) and the Russian Association of Functional Diagnostics Specialists (RASFD). The Medical alphabet. 2021;(39): 8-18. (In Russ.)
6. Cardim N, Dalen H, Voigt JU, et al. The use of handheld ultrasound devices: a position statement of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (2018 update). Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;20(3):245-52. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jey145.
7. Kou S, Caballero L, Dulgheru R, et al. Echocardiographic reference ranges for normal cardiac chamber size: results from the NORRE study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;15(6):680-90. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jet284.
8. Hall DP, Jordan H, Alam S, et al. The impact of focused echocardiography using the Focused Intensive Care Echo protocol on the management of critically ill patients, and comparison with full echocardiographic studies by BSE-accredited sonographers. J Intensive Care Soc. 2017;18(3):206-11. doi:10.1177/1751143717700911.
9. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28(1):1-39.e14. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.003.
10. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, et al. American Society of Echocardiography’s Nomenclature and Standards Committee; Task Force on Chamber Quantification; American College of Cardiology Echocardiography Committee; American Heart Association; European Association of Echocardiography, European Society of Cardiology. Recommendations for chamber quantification. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2006;7(2):79-108. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2012-4s4.
11. Pellikka PA, Arruda-Olson A, Chaudhry FA, et al. Guidelines for Performance, Interpretation, and Application of Stress Echocardiography in Ischemic Heart Disease: From the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020;33(1):1-41.e8. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2019.07.001.
12. Farsalinos KE, Daraban AM, Ünlü S, et al. Head-to-Head Comparison of Global Longitudinal Strain Measurements among Nine Different Vendors: The EACVI/ASE InterVendor Comparison Study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28(10):1171-e2. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2015.06.01.
13. Redfield MM, Borlaug BA. Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Review. JAMA. 2023;329(10):827-38. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.2020.
14. Hillis GS, Møller JE, Pellikka PA, et al. Noninvasive estimation of left ventricular filling pressure by E/e’ is a powerful predictor of survival after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43(3):360-7. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.07.044.
15. Sharp AS, Tapp RJ, Thom SA, et al. Tissue Doppler E/E’ ratio is a powerful predictor of primary cardiac events in a hypertensive population: an ASCOT substudy. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(6):747-52. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehp498.
16. Mareev YuV, Dzhioeva ON, Zorya OT, et al. Focus ultrasound for cardiology practice. Russian consensus document. Kardiologiia. 2021;61(11):4-23. (In Russ.) doi:10.18087/cardio.2021.11.n1812.
17. Narang A, Bae R, Hong H, et al. Utility of a Deep-Learning Algorithm to Guide Novices to Acquire Echocardiograms for Limited Diagnostic Use. JAMA Cardiol. 2021;6(6):624-32. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2021.0185.
18. Madani A, Arnaout R, Mofrad M, Arnaout R. Fast and accurate view classification of echocardiograms using deep learning. NPJ Digit Med. 2018;1:6. doi:10.1038/s41746-017-0013-1.
19. Huang MS, Wang CS, Chiang JH, Liu PY, Tsai WC. Automated Recognition of Regional Wall Motion Abnormalities Through Deep Neural Network Interpretation of Transthoracic Echocardiography. Circulation. 2020;142(16):1510-20. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.047530.
20. Lang RM, Addetia K, Narang A, Mor-Avi V. 3-Dimensional Echocardiography: Latest Developments and Future Directions. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11(12):1854-78. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.06.024.
21. Sławiński G, Hawryszko M, Liżewska-Springer A, et al. Global Longitudinal Strain in CardioOncology: A Review. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(3):986. doi:10.3390/cancers15030986.
22. Mor-Avi V, Lang RM, Badano LP, et al. Current and evolving echocardiographic techniques for the quantitative evaluation of cardiac mechanics: ASE/EAE consensus statement on methodology and indications endorsed by the Japanese Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011;24(3):277-313. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2011.01.015.
23. Marzlin N, Hays AG, Peters M, et al. Myocardial Work in Echocardiography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023;16(2):e014419. doi:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.122.014419.
24. Moya A, Buytaert D, Penicka M, et al. State-of-the-Art: Noninvasive Assessment of Left Ventricular Function Through Myocardial Work. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2023;36(10): 1027-42. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2023.07.002.
Review
For citations:
Matskeplishvili S.T., Saidova M.A., Mironenko M.Yu., Safarova A.F., Pavlyukova E.N., Boshchenko A.A., Yaroslavskaya E.I., Akhunova S.Yu., Skidan V.I., Irtyuga O.B., Kozlenok A.V., Fedorova D.N. Standard transthoracic echocardiography. Guidelines 2024. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2025;30(2):6271. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2025-6271. EDN: TNLDFN