Topical issues of myocardial infarction incidence statistics
https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2024-5928
EDN: GPQNAD
Abstract
The article presents the features of statistical assessment of myocardial infarction (MI) incidence and prevalence in Russia and some countries of the world. The existing methodology for assessing incidence in Russia does not take into account all cases of MI. Local registries (based on one or several institutions with limitations on age and clinical features) are not a sufficient basis for assessing incidence or prevalence, since they do not represent a representative sample of the population in terms of demographic characteristics. There is a high probability of incorrect use of I22 codes. There are no uniform accounting rules in the world (ICD codes for MI accounting are not similar to universal definition of MI).
About the Authors
E. P. Kakorina
Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute;
I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
I. V. Samorodskaya
Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute;
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
S. Yu. Martsevich
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Son IM, Starodubov VI, Manoshkina EM, Stupak VS. Trends in morbidity and in-hospital mortality from cardiovascular diseases during COVID-19 pandemic. Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2021;24(11):7-14. (In Russ.) doi:10.17116/profmed2021241117.
2. Korkhmazov VT, Perkhov VI, Hodakova OV. Impact of a pandemic of COVID-19 on indicators of incidence of the population. Modern problems of health care and medical statistics. 2022;4:588-609. (In Russ.) doi:10.24412/2312-2935-2022-4-588-609.
3. Porta M, editor. A Dictionary of Epidemiology. 6th ed. Oxford University Press; Oxford: 2014- Medical, 343 p. Print ISBN-13: 9780199976720 eISBN:9780199390069.
4. Ruda MYa, Zysko AP. Myocardial infarction Series: Library of a practicing physician. 1981. 288 p. (In Russ.) Руда М.Я., Зыско А.П. Инфаркт миокарда Серия: Библиотека практического врача. 1981, 288 с.
5. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al.; Executive Group on behalf of the Joint European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA)/World Heart Federation (WHF) Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018). Circulation. 2018;138(20):e618-e651. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000617.
6. Chen DY, Li CY, Hsieh MJ, et al. Predictors of subsequent myocardial infarction, stroke, and death in stable post-myocardial infarction patients: A nationwide cohort study. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019;8(7):634-42. doi:10.1177/2048872617730037.
7. Holzmann MJ, Andersson T, Doemland ML, Roux S. Recurrent myocardial infarction and emergency department visits: a retrospective study on the Stockholm Area Chest Pain Cohort. Open Heart. 2023;10(1):e002206. doi:10.1136/openhrt-2022-002206.
8. De Luca L, Paolucci L, Nusca A, et al. Current management and prognosis of patients with recurrent myocardial infarction. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2021;22(3):731-40. doi:10.31083/j.rcm2203080.
9. Samorodskaya IV, Boytsov SA. Subsequent myocardial infarction: risk assessment a nd prevention. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2017;(6):139-45. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2017-6-139-145.
10. American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2023 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023;147(8):e93- e621. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001123.
11. Kim RB, Kim JR, Hwang JY. Epidemiology of myocardial infarction in Korea: hospitalization incidence, prevalence, and mortality. Epidemiol Health. 2022;44:e2022057. doi:10.4178/epih.e2022057.
12. Shalnova SA, Drapkina OM, Kutsenko VA, et al. on behalf of the ESSE-RF study participants. T.M. Myocardial infarction in the population of some Russian regions and its prognostic value. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2022;27(6):4952. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2022-4952.
13. Boytsov SA, Shakhnovich RM, Erlikh AD, et al. Registry of Acute Myocardial Infarction. REGION-MI — Russian Registry of Acute Myocardial Infarction. Kardiologiia. 2021;61(6): 41-51. (In Russ.) doi:10.18087/cardio.2021.6.n1595.
14. Martsevich SYu, Kutishenko NP, Sichinava DP, et al. Prospective outpatient registry of myocardial infarction patients (PROFILE-MI): study design and first results. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2018;17(1):81-6. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1728-8800-2018-1-81-86.
15. Sagaydak OV, Oshchepkova EV, Popova YuV, et al. Treatment of patients with acute coronary syndrome in 2019 (data from federal registry of acute coronary syndrome). Russian Cardiology Bulletin/Kardiologicheskii Vestnik 2020;3:37-45. (In Russ.) doi:10.36396/MS.2020.16.3.005.
Supplementary files
- Thousands of articles on the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of myocardial infarction (MI) are published worldwide every year.
- The presented problems with assessing the incidence and prevalence of first and subsequent MI among the population in Russia and worldwide require solutions, since this affects the assessment of the effectiveness and need for care.
Review
For citations:
Kakorina E.P., Samorodskaya I.V., Martsevich S.Yu. Topical issues of myocardial infarction incidence statistics. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2024;29(9):5928. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2024-5928. EDN: GPQNAD
Views:
562
Email this article 