Preview

Russian Journal of Cardiology

Advanced search

Problematic points of anticoagulant therapy for atrial fibrillation in certain Russian regions in 2016- 2019: results of a retrospective big data analysis

https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-20245901

EDN: DEAFDD

Abstract

Aim. This retrospective analysis of anticoagulant therapy prescription rate in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) aged ³18 years in certain Russian regions in 20162019 using artificial intelligence technologies.

Material and methods. Anonymized data of patients with AF aged ³18 years (n=144431; men, 42,0%; mean age, 68,9±15,7 years; mean CHA2DS2-VASc score, 3,2±1,8) were extracted from the Webiomed predictive analytics service using continuous sampling from electronic health records in medical facilities of 6 Russian constituent entities (Republic of Bashkortostan, Republic of Buryatia, Republic of Karelia, Republic of Sakha (Yakutia), Perm Krai, Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug) for 2016-2019 using artificial intelligence technologies.

 

Results. Anticoagulant therapy prescription rate in the total sample was 29,7%. Patients with AF and a high thromboembolism risk received anticoagulants in 34,8% of cases. Anticoagulant therapy was prescribed significantly less frequently to women with AF compared to men. In the subgroup of individuals aged under 75 years, anticoagulant therapy prescription rate with a high thromboembolism risk exceeded the same indicator in the subgroup of individuals aged ³75 years as follows: 41,2% vs 29,6% (p<0,001). In patients with AF under 75 years and a high thromboembolism risk, anticoagulant therapy prescription rate significantly gained with an increase in the number of points on the CHA2DS2-VASc scale in the range from 33,2% to 61,9%, in patients aged ³75 years — in the range from 13,0% to 55,5%. We revealed that 23317 (16,1%) patients were prescribed direct oral anticoagulants, of which 9,655 (41,4%) patients initially received warfarin.

Conclusion. The study results indicate an unsatisfactory anticoagulant therapy prescription rate in patients with AF and a high thromboembolism risk in certain Russian regions in 2016-2019. Despite its growth with a CHA2DS2-VASc score increase in the high-risk range, it did not comply with current clinical guidelines This specifies the need for stricter control over the implementation of treatment and diagnostic algorithms and local protocols for managing these patients.

About the Authors

M. A. Druzhilov
Petrozavodsk State University
Russian Federation

Petrozavodsk



O. Yu. Druzhilova
Petrozavodsk State University
Russian Federation

Petrozavodsk



Z. A. Ilchenko
Petrozavodsk State University
Russian Federation

Petrozavodsk



P. I. Chalaya
Petrozavodsk State University
Russian Federation

Petrozavodsk



T. Yu. Kuznetsova
Petrozavodsk State University
Russian Federation

Petrozavodsk



References

1. Arakelyan MG, Bockeria LA, Vasilieva EYu, et al. 2020 Clinical guidelines for Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2021;26(7):4594. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2021-4594.

2. Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2021;26(9):4701. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2021-4701.

3. Joglar J, Chung M, Armbruster A, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2024;149(1):1-156. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193.

4. Ruff C, Giugliano R, Braunwald E, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2014;383(9921):955-62. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62343-0.

5. Gadsboll K, Staerk L, Fosbol E, et al. Increased use of oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation: temporal trends from 2005 to 2015 in Denmark. Eur Heart J. 2017; 38(12):899-906. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw658.

6. Cowan J, Wu J, Hall M, et al. A 10 year study of hospitalized atrial fibrillation-related stroke in England and its association with uptake of oral anticoagulation. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(32):2975-83. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy411.

7. Reshetko OV, Sokolov AV, Furman NV. Analysis of antithrombotic therapy of atrial fibrillation in international and Russian registries. Kachestvennaya klinicheskaya praktika. 2019;1:83-96. (In Russ.) doi:10.24411/2588-0519-2019-10066.

8. Mareev YuV, Polyakov DS, Vinogradova NG, et al. Epidemiology of atrial fibrillation in a representative sample of the European part of the Russian Federation. Analysis of EPOCH-CHF study. Kardiologiia. 2022;62(4):12-9. (In Russ.) doi:10.18087/cardio.2022.4.n1997.

9. Loukianov MM, Martsevich SYu, Drapkina OM, et al. The Therapy with Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in Outpatient and Hospital Settings (Data from RECVASA Registries). Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2019;15(4):538-45. (In Russ.) doi:10.20996/1819-6446-2019-15-4-538-545.

10. Ionin VA, Barashkova EI, Filatova AG, et al. Atrial fibrillation in St Petersburg cohort: frequency, risk factors, antiarrhythmic therapy and thromboembolism prevention. Arterialnaya Gipertenziya (Arterial Hypertension). 2020;26(2):192-201. (In Russ.) doi:10.18705/1607-419X-2020-26-2-192-201.

11. Gusev AV, Zingerman BV, Tyufilin DS, Zinchenko VV. Electronic medical records as a source of real-world clinical data. Real-World Data & Evidence. 2022;2(2):8-20. (In Russ.) doi:10.37489/2782-3784-myrwd-13.

12. Kanorskii SG. Atrial fibrillation in old age: risk management and features of the use of direct oral anticoagulants. Kardiologiia. 2021;61(6):79-87. (In Russ.) doi:10.18087/cardio.2021.6.n1627.

13. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2017;(7):7-86. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2017-7-7-86.

14. Malik A, Yandrapalli S, Aronow W, et al. Meta-Analysis of Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants Compared With Warfarin in Patients >75 Years of Age. Am J Cardiol. 2019;123(12): 2051-7. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.02.060.

15. Thompson L, Maddox T, Lei L, et al. Sex Differences in the Use of Oral Anticoagulants for Atrial Fibrillation: A Report From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) PINNACLE Registry. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(7):e005801. doi:10.1161/JAHA.117.005801.

16. Shlyakhto EV, Baranova EI. Central directions for reducing cardiovascular mortality: what can be changed today? Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020;25(7):3983. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2020-3983.

17. Anjum M, Ariansen I, Hjellvik V, et al. Stroke and bleeding risk in atrial fibrillation with CHA2DS2-VASC risk score of one: the Norwegian AFNOR study. European Heart Journal. 2024;45(1):57-66. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad659.

18. Druzhilov MA, Kuznetsova TYu. Patients with atrial fibrillation and a low risk of thromboembolic events: prescription rate of anticoagulant therapy according to a retrospective analysis. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2023;28(8):5522. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2023-5522.


Supplementary files

What is already known about the subject?

  • Anticoagulant therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF) to the greatest extent determines the prognosis of pati­ents, allowing managing the thromboembolism risk.
  • In the absence of absolute contraindications, all pati­ents with AF and a high risk of cardioembolic ische­mic stroke should be prescribed anticoagulants.

What might this study add?

  • Anticoagulant therapy prescription rate in AF and a high thromboembolism risk in certain Russian re­gions in 2016-2019 was only 34,8%.

Review

For citations:


Druzhilov M.A., Druzhilova O.Yu., Ilchenko Z.A., Chalaya P.I., Kuznetsova T.Yu. Problematic points of anticoagulant therapy for atrial fibrillation in certain Russian regions in 2016- 2019: results of a retrospective big data analysis. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2024;29(9):5901. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-20245901. EDN: DEAFDD

Views: 514


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1560-4071 (Print)
ISSN 2618-7620 (Online)