Resting 12-lead electrocardiography for adults and children. 2023 Guidelines
https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2023-5631
EDN: JAVUJL
Abstract
Russian Society of Cardiology (RSC)
Developed with the special contribution of the Russian Functional Diagnostics Association, Russian Holter Monitoring and Non-invasive Electrophysiology Society, Russian Pediatric Cardiology Association.
About the Authors
D. V. DrozdovRussian Federation
Moscow
L. M. Makarov
Russian Federation
Moscow
V. S. Barkan
Russian Federation
Chita
T. M. Gazashvili
Russian Federation
Moscow
V. P. Efimova
Russian Federation
Moscow
M. Yu. Zhuk
Russian Federation
Moscow
O. B. Irtyuga
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
L. A. Kalinin
Russian Federation
Moscow
I. A. Kovalev
Russian Federation
Moscow
V. N. Komolyatova
Russian Federation
Moscow
E. V. Parmon
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
A. N. Rogoza
Russian Federation
Moscow
P. V. Struchkov
Russian Federation
Moscow
A. A. Tatarinova
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
Yu. E. Teregulov
Russian Federation
Kazan
T. V. Treshkur
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
D. V. Shutov
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Functional diagnostics. National leadership. Ed. N.F. Beresten, V.A. Sandrikov, S.I. Fedorova. M.: GEOTAR-Media. 2019. 784 p. (In Russ.)
2. Kligfield P, Gettes LS, Bailey JJ, et al.; American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; American College of Cardiology Foundation; Heart Rhythm Society. Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part I: the electrocardiogram and its technology a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(10):1109-27. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.024.
3. Rautaharju PM, Park L, Rautaharju FS, Crow R. A standardized procedure for locating and documenting ECG chest electrode positions: consideration of the effect of breast tissue on ECG amplitudes in women. J Electrocardiol. 1998;31(1):17-29. doi:10.1016/s0022-0736(98)90003-6.
4. Neroeva GA, Groholskaya VV, Shchedrina EV, et al. Standard operating procedures as the basis of nursing activities in functional diagnostics departments. Medical alphabet. The series "Modern functional diagnostics". 2019;2(12):37-41. (In Russ.) doi:10.33667/2078-5631-2019-2-12(387)-37-41.
5. Pugachev MV, Ipatova OV, Korotina EV, Sinkin MV. Sample samples of standard operating procedures performed by middle-level employees in departments and offices of functional diagnostics. Medical alphabet. The series "Modern functional diagnostics". 2021;(39):53- 62. (In Russ.) doi:10.33667/2078-5631-2021-39-53-62.
6. Functional diagnostics: a guide for nursing staff. Ed. P.V. Struchkov, N.F. Beresten. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2023. 384 p. (In Russ.) doi:10.33029/9704-7960-5-FDS-2023-1-384.
7. Mason RE, Likar I. A new system of multiple-lead exercise electrocardiography. Am Heart J. 1966;7(1):196-205.
8. Khan GM. A new electrode placement method for obtaining 12-lead ECGs. Open Heart. 2015;2(1): e000226. doi:10.1136/openhrt-2014-000226.
9. Pahlm O, Wagner GS. Proximal placement of limb electrodes: a potential solution for acquiring standard electrocardiogram waveforms from monitoring electrode positions. Journal of Electrocardiology. 2008;41(6):454-7. doi:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2008.06.019.
10. Trägårdh-Johansson E, Welinder A, Pahlm O.Similarity of ST and T waveforms of 12-lead electrocardiogram acquired from different monitoring electrode positions. Journal of Electrocardiology. 2011;44(2):109-14. doi:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2010.11.012.
11. Welinder A, Wagner GS, Maynard C, Pahlm O.Differences in QRS axis measurements, classification of inferior myocardial infarction, and noise tolerance for 12-lead electrocardiograms acquired from monitoring electrode positions compared to standard locations. The American journal of cardiology. 2010;106(4):581-6. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.03.073.
12. Welinder A, Sornmo L, Feild DQ, et al. Comparison of signal quality between EASI and Mason-Likar 12-lead electrocardiograms during physical activity. Am J of critical care. 2004;13(3):228-34. doi:10.4037/ajcc2004.13.3.228.
13. Pearce A.Examining the causes and effects of electrode misplacement during electrocardiography: a literature review. British Journal of Cardiac Nursing. 2019;14(7):1- 15. doi:10.12968/bjca.2019.0010.
14. Jowett NI, Turner AM, Cole A, Jones PA. Modified electrode placement must be recorded when performing 12-lead electrocardiograms. Postgraduate medical journal. 2005;81(952):122-5. doi:10.1136/pgmj.2004.021204.
15. Crawford J, Doherty L.Ten steps to recording a standard 12-lead ECG. Practice Nursing. 2010;21(12):622-30. doi:10.12968/pnur.2010.21.12.622.
16. McStay S.Recording a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). British Journal of Nursing. 2019;28(12):756-60. doi:10.12968/bjon.2019.28.12.756.
17. Rosen AV, Koppikar S, Shaw C, Baranchuk A.Common ECG lead placement errors. Part I: Limb lead reversals. International Journal of Medical Students. 2014;2(3):92-8.
18. Rosen AV, Koppikar S, Shaw C, Baranchuk A.Common ECG lead placement errors. Part II: precordial misplacements. International Journal of Medical Students. 2014;2(3):99-103.
19. MacFarlane PW, Colaco R, Stevens K, et al. Precordial electrode placement in women. Netherlands Heart Journal. 2003;11(3):118-22.
20. Wallen R, Tunnage B, Wells S.The 12-lead ECG in the emergency medical service setting: how electrode placement and paramedic gender are experienced by women. Emerg Med J. 2014;31(10):851-2. doi:10.1136/emermed-2013-202826.
21. Bun SS, Taghji P, Errahmouni A, et al. Electrocardiographic modifications induced by breast implants. Clin Cardiol. 2019;42(5):542–5. doi:10.1002/clc.23174.
22. Bickerton M, Pooler A.Misplaced ECG electrodes and the need for continuing training. British Journal of Cardiac Nursing. 2019;14(3):123-32. doi:10.12968/bjca.2019.14.3.123.
23. Schläpfer J, Wellens HJ. Computer-interpreted electrocardiograms: benefits and limitations. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2017;70(9):1183-92. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.07.723.
24. Smulyan H.The computerized ECG: friend and foe. The American journal of medicine. 2019;132(2):153-60. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.08.025.
25. Young B, Schmid J-J. The New ISO/IEC Standard for Automated ECG Interpretation. Hearts. 2021;2(3):410-8. doi:10.3390/hearts2030032.
26. Drozdov DV. Non-obvious causes of diagnostic errors in electrocardiography. M.: Medika, 2014. 216 p. (In Russ.) ISBN: 978-5-98495–026.
27. Drozdov DV. Brugada-similar ECG changes caused by signal filtering. Medical alphabet. 2019;1(8):21-5. (In Russ.)
28. Luo S, Johnston P. A review of electrocardiogram filtering. Journal of electrocardiology. 2010;43(6):486-96. doi:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2010.07.007.
29. Aslanger E, Tokdil KO, Tokdil H, Yalin K. Filtering electrocardiogram: Music, math and ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Arch Turk Soc Cardiol. 2021;49(6):509-11. doi:10.5543/tkda.2021.40156.
30. Kligfield P, Okin PM. Prevalence and clinical implications of improper filter settings in routine electrocardiography. The American journal of cardiology. 2007;99(5):711-3. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.09.123.
31. Lenis G, Pilia N, Loewe A, et al. Comparison of baseline wander removal techniques considering the preservation of ST changes in the ischemic ECG: a simulation study. Computational and mathematical methods in medicine. 2017;2017:9295029, 13p. doi:10.1155/2017/9295029.
32. Young B.New standards for ECG equipment. Journal of Electrocardiology. 2019;57: S1-S4. doi:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2019.07.013.
33. Pérez‐Riera AR, Barbosa-Barros R, Daminello-Raimundo R, Abreu LC. Main artifacts in electrocardiography. Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology. 2018;23(2): e12494. doi:10.1111/anec.12494.
34. Makarov LM. ECG in pediatrics. Manual. M.: Medpraktika, 2013. 695 p. (In Russ.) Макаров Л.М. ЭКГ в педиатрии. Руководство. М.: Медпрактика, 2013. 695 с. ISBN: 978-5-98803-297-7.
35. Bodenheimer MM, Banka VS, Helfant RH. Determination of lead III Q waves significance utility of deep inspiration. Arch Intern Med. 1977;137(4):437-9. doi:10.1001/archinte.1977.03630160011006.
36. Nanni S, Lovato L, Vagnarelli F, et al. Inferior Q waves in apparently healthy subjects: Should we take a deep breath? An electrocardiographic, echocardiographic and cardiac magnetic resonance study. J Electrocardiol. 2016;49(1):46-54. doi:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2015.08.026.
37. Fioranelli A, Paolini E, Quaranta A. QRS Morphologies of Difficult Interpretation. New Concepts in ECG Interpretation. ed. A.Capucci. Springer: Cham, 2019. p. 59-73. ISBN: 978-3-319-91677-4.
Review
For citations:
Drozdov D.V., Makarov L.M., Barkan V.S., Gazashvili T.M., Efimova V.P., Zhuk M.Yu., Irtyuga O.B., Kalinin L.A., Kovalev I.A., Komolyatova V.N., Parmon E.V., Rogoza A.N., Struchkov P.V., Tatarinova A.A., Teregulov Yu.E., Treshkur T.V., Shutov D.V. Resting 12-lead electrocardiography for adults and children. 2023 Guidelines. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2023;28(10):5631. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2023-5631. EDN: JAVUJL