Risk factors and outcomes of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with stable coronary artery disease: data from the observational registry of long-term antithrombotic therapy REGATTA-1
https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2021-4465
Abstract
Aim. To optimize the upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) risk scale in patients Material and methods. The UGIB risk scale was developed based on the with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) receiving long-term antiplatelet therapy. prospective REGistry of long-term AnTithrombotic TherApy-1 REGATTA-1(ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04347200). The registry includes 934 patients with stable CAD (men, 78,6%; median age, 61±10,7 years), 76% of whom were included after elective percutaneous coronary interventions and received dual antiplatelet therapy for 6-12 months. After a UGIB episode, patients were prescribed proton pump inhibitors. The 2015 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) scale was used for assessing the UGIB risk. In addition, we evaluated the ultrasound data on atherosclerotic burden (abdominal aorta and peripheral arteries).
Results. The median follow-up was 2,5 years [1,1-14,7 years]. The incidence of UGIB was 1,9 cases per 100 patient/years. Recurrent UGIB episodes and thrombosis was recorded in 13,7% and 31,4%, respectively. Based on the results of a multivariate logistic regression, a novel scale for assessing the UGIB risk (REGATTA) has been developed. In accordance with the odds ratio, points were assigned for each independent risk factor (RF): age ≥80 years — 3 points, prior gastric erosion, peptic ulcer disease or UGIB — 3 points for each RF, anticoagulation therapy — 4 points, non-steroidal antiinflammatory drug therapy — 2 points. The atherosclerotic burden (peripheral atherosclerosis and/or abdominal aortic aneurysm; 2 points) and heart failure (in most cases after a myocardial infarction; 2 points) were marked as a new independent predictor. The cutoff value (≥4 points) was determined, reflecting the high UGIB risk (sensitivity, 80,4%; specificity, 84,5%). The REGATTA scale was more powerful than the traditional 2015 ESC scale: AUC of 0,88, (95% confidence interval, 0,86-0,9) vs AUC of 0,79, (95% confidence interval, 0,760,82) (p=0,04).
Conclusion. The identified UGIB predictors (atherosclerotic burden and heart failure) and the developed REGATTA scale made it possible to improve the prognosis and prevention of UGIB in patients with stable CAD receiving long-term antiplatelet therapy.
About the Authors
A. L. KomarovRussian Federation
Moscow.
Competing Interests:
No
O. O. Shakhmatova
Russian Federation
Moscow.
Competing Interests:
No
V. V. Korobkova
Russian Federation
Moscow.
Competing Interests:
No
E. S. Novikova
Russian Federation
Moscow.
Competing Interests:
No
E. V. Guskova
Russian Federation
Moscow.
Competing Interests:
No
E. B. Yarovaya
Russian Federation
Moscow.
Competing Interests:
No
T. V. Balachonova
Russian Federation
Moscow.
Competing Interests:
No
A. G. Shuleshova
Russian Federation
Moscow.
Competing Interests:
No
E. P. Panchenko
Russian Federation
Moscow.
Competing Interests:
No
References
1. Sehested TSG, Carlson N, Hansen PW, et al. Reduced risk of gastrointestinal bleeding associated with proton pump inhibitor therapy in patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy after myocardial infarction. European Heart Journal. 2019;40(24):1963-70. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz104.
2. Costa F, van Klaveren D, James S, et al. PRECISE-DAPT Study Investigators. Derivation and validation of the predicting bleeding complications in patients undergoing stent implantation and subsequent dual antiplatelet therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) score: a pooled analysis of individual-patient datasets from clinical trials. Lancet. 2017;389:1025-34. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30397-5.
3. Urban P, Mehran R, Colleran R, et al. Defining high bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a consensus document from the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(31):2632-53. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz372.
4. Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet J-P, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). European Heart Journal. 2016;37(3):267-315. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv320.
5. Shakhmatova OO, Komarov AL, Korobkova VV, et al. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with stable coronary artery disease (registry of antithrombotic therapy “REGATTA” results). Terapevticheskii arkhiv. 2020;92(9):30-8. (In Russ.) doi:10.26442/00403660.2020.09.000699.
6. Genereux P, Giustino G, Witzenbichler B, et al. Incidence, Predictors, and Impact of Post-Discharge Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(9):1036-45. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2015.06.1323.
7. Shaukat A, Waheed S, Alexander E, et al. Etiology of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy. J Dig Dis. 2018;19:66-73. doi:10.1111/1751-2980.12575.
8. Koskinas KC, Raber L, Zanchin T, et al. Clinical impact of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(5):e002053. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002053.
9. Jensen BES, Hansen JM, Larsen KS, et al. Randomized clinical trial: the impact of gastrointestinal gastrointestinal risk factor screening and prophylactic proton pump inhibitor therapy in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;29(10):1118-25. doi:10.1097/meg.0000000000000934.
10. Crowe SE. Helicobacter pylori Infection. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(12):1158-65. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp1710945.
11. Jolobe OMP. The Association of Peptic Ulcer Disease and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. The American Journal of Medicine. 2019;132(9):e724. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.03.047.
12. Bhatt DL, Steg PG, Ohman EM, et al. International prevalence, recognition, and treatment of cardiovascular risk factors in outpatients with atherothrombosis. JAMA. 2006;295(2):180-9. doi:10.1001/jama.295.2.180.
13. Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). European Heart Journal. 2020;41(3):407-77. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425.
14. Sung JJ, Lau JY, Ching JY, et al. Continuation of low-dose aspirin therapy in peptic ulcer bleeding: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(1):1-9. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-152-1-201001050-00179.
15. Clemens A, Strack A, Noack H, et al. Anticoagulant-related gastrointestinal bleeding— could this facilitate early detection of benign or malignant gastrointestinal lesions? Annals of Medicine. 2014;46:672-8. doi:10.3109/07853890.2014.952327.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Komarov A.L., Shakhmatova O.O., Korobkova V.V., Novikova E.S., Guskova E.V., Yarovaya E.B., Balachonova T.V., Shuleshova A.G., Panchenko E.P. Risk factors and outcomes of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with stable coronary artery disease: data from the observational registry of long-term antithrombotic therapy REGATTA-1. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2021;26(6):4465. https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2021-4465