Социально-экономические детерминанты пищевого поведения

Модификация диеты — эффективный метод профилактики и лечения сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний и их факторов риска: артериальной гипертензии, гипергликемии, ожирения, дислипидемий. Крупные исследования доказали существование причинно-следственных связей между пищевым поведением (преимущественное потребление фруктов, овощей, переработанного мяса или транс-жиров) и основными социально-значимыми заболеваниями (ишемическая болезнь сердца, сахарный диабет, злокачественные новообразования). На основании полученных данных были разработаны национальные и международные рекомендации по питанию, направленные на профилактику этих заболеваний. Однако приверженность рациональным диетам попрежнему остаётся низкой, в связи с чем многими учёными было высказано предположение о влиянии социально-экономического статуса на выбор стереотипа питания. Цель настоящего обзора — анализ и обсуждение основных социально-экономических детерминант (уровень доходов и образования, семейное положение) пищевого поведения населения.

1. Abbasnezhad A, Falahi E, Gonzalez MJ, et al. Effect of Different Dietary Approaches in Comparison with High/Low-Carbohydrate Diets on Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Prev Nutr Food Sci. 2020;25(3):233-45. doi:10.3746/pnf.2020.25.3.233.

2. Tsygankova DP, Krivoshapova KЕ, Barbarash OL. Nutrition as the risk factor for cardiovascular pathology from epidemiological perspective. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2018;17(2):88-94. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1728-8800-2018-2-88-94.

3. Romieu L, Dossus S, Barquera HM, et al; IARC Working Group on Energy Balance and Obesity. Energy balance and obesity: what are the main drivers? Cancer Causes Control. 2017;28(3):247-258. doi:10.1007/s10552-017-0869-z.

4. Micha R, Shulkin ML, Peñalvo JL. Etiologic effects and optimal intakes of foods and nutrients for risk of cardiovascular diseases and diabetes: systematic reviews and metaanalyses from the Nutrition and Chronic Diseases Expert Group (NutriCoDE). PLoS One. 2017;12(4):e0175149. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175149.

5. Thirteenth general programme of work, 2019-2023. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018 (ссылка активна на 01.02.2021. https://www.who.int/ru/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/healthy-diet.

6. GBD 2017 Diet Collaborators. Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990- 2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2019;393(10184):1958-72. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30041-8.

7. Mayén AL, Marques-Vidal P, Paccaud F, et al. Socioeconomic determinants of dietary patterns in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;100:1520-31. doi:10.3945/ajcn.114.089029.

8. Miller V, Yusuf S, Chow CK, et al. Availability, affordability, and consumption of fruits and vegetables in 18 countries across income levels: findings from the prospective urban rural epidemiology (PURE) study. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4:e695-e703. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30186-3.

9. Hinnig PF, Monteiro JS, de Assis M, et al. Dietary patterns of children and adolescents from high, Medium and Low Human Development Countries and Associated Socioeconomic Factors: A Systematic Review. Nutrients. 2018;10:436. doi:10.3390/nu10040436.

10. Czarnocinska J, Wadolowska L, Lonnie M, et al. Regional and socioeconomic variations in dietary patterns in a representative sample of young polish females: a crosssectional study (GEBaHealth project). Nutr J. 2020;19(1):26. doi:10.1186/s12937-020-00546-8.

11. Andrade GC, Da Costa Louzada ML, Azeredo CM, et al. Out-of-home food consumers in Brazil: what do they eat? Nutrients. 2018;10:218. doi:10.3390/nu1002021.

12. Singh S, Jones AD, Jain M. Regional differences in agricultural and socioeconomic factors associated with farmer household dietary diversity in India. PLoS One. 2020;15(4):e0231107. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231107.

13. Cembranel F, Wagner KJP, González-Chica DA, d’Orsi E. Education and Income Levels are Associated With Energy and Micronutrient Intake. Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 2020;90(3-4):228- 38. doi:10.1024/0300-9831/a000535.

14. Hiza HA, Casavale KO, Guenther PM, et al. Diet quality of Americans differs by age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, and education level. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113:297-306. doi:10.1016/j.jand.2012.08.011.

15. Nishi N, Horikawa C, Murayama N. Characteristics of food group intake by household income in the National Health and Nutrition Survey, Japan. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2017;26(1):156-9. doi:10.6133/apjcn.102015.15.

16. Zagorsky JL, Smith PK. The association between socioeconomic status and adult fast-food consumption in the U.S. Econ Hum Biol. 2017;27(Pt A):12-25. doi:10.1016/j.ehb.2017.04.004.

17. Maksimov S, Karamnova N, Shalnova S, Drapkina O. Sociodemographic and Regional Determinants of Dietary Patterns in Russia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(1):328. doi:10.3390/ijerph17010328.

18. Cade J, Upmeier H, Calvert C, et al. Costs of a healthy diet: analysis from the UK Women’s Cohort Study. Public Health Nutr. 1999;2(4):505-12. doi:10.1017/s1368980099000683.

19. Rehm CD, Monsivais P, Drewnowski A. The quality and monetary value of diets consumed by adults in the United States. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94:1333-9.

20. Morris MA, Hulme C, Clarke GP, et al. What is the cost of a healthy diet? Using diet data from the UK Women’s Cohort Study. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2014;68:1043-9.

21. Rao M, Afshin A, Singh G, et al. Do healthier foods and diet patterns cost more than less healthy options? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e004277. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004277.

22. Monsivais P, Rehm CD, Drewnowski A. The DASH diet and diet costs among ethnic and racial groups in the United States. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:1922-4.

23. Aggarwal A, Monsivais P, Drewnowski A. Nutrient intakes linked to better health outcomes are associated with higher diet costs in the US. PLoS One. 2012;7:e37533. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037533.

24. Kurotani K, Ishikawa-Takata K, Takimoto H. Diet quality of Japanese adults with respect to age, sex, and income level in the National Health and Nutrition Survey, Japan. Public Health Nutr. 2020;23(5):821-32. doi:10.1017/S1368980019002088.

25. Dietz WH. We Need a New Approach to Prevent Obesity in Low-Income Minority Populations. Pediatrics. 2019;143(6):e20190839. doi:10.1542/peds.2019-0839.

26. Mendoza A, Pérez AE, Aggarwal A, Drewnowski A. Energy density of foods and diets in Mexico and their monetary cost by socioeconomic strata: analyses of ENSANUT data 2012. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017;71(7):713-21. doi:10.1136/jech-2016-207781.

27. Clark RL, Famodu OA, Barr ML, et al. Monetary Cost of the MyPlate Diet in Young Adults: Higher Expenses Associated with Increased Fruit and Vegetable Consumption. J Nutr Metab. 2019;2019:2790963. doi:10.1155/2019/2790963.

28. French SA, Tangney CC, Crane MM, et al. Nutrition quality of food purchases varies by household income: the SHoPPER study. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):231. doi:10.1186/s12889-019-6546-2.

29. Laraia BA, Leak TM, Tester JM, Leung CW. Biobehavioral Factors That Shape Nutrition in Low-Income Populations: A Narrative Review. Am J Prev Med. 2017;52(2S2):S118-S126. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2016.08.003.

30. Yannakoulia M, Panagiotakos D, Pitsavos C, et al. Eating patterns may mediate the association between marital status, body mass index, and blood cholesterol levels in apparently healthy men and women from the ATTICA study. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66(11):2230-9. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.051.

31. Smith KJ, McNaughton SA, Gall SL, et al. Associations between partnering and parenting transitions and dietary habits in young adults. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017;117(8):1210‐21.

32. Laroche HH, Wallace RB, Snetselaar L, et al. Changes in diet behavior when adults become parents. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012;112(6):832‐9.

33. Elstgeest LE, Mishra GD, Dobson AJ. Transitions in living arrangements are associated with changes in dietary patterns in young women. J Nutr. 2012;142(8):1561‐7.

34. Winpenny EM, van Sluijs EMF, White M, et al. Changes in diet through adolescence and early adulthood: longitudinal trajectories and association with key life transitions. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2018;15:86. doi:10.1186/s12966-018-0719-8.

35. Perry B, Ciciurkaite G, Brady CF, Garcia J. Partner Influence in Diet and Exercise Behaviors: Testing Behavior Modeling, Social Control, and Normative Body Size. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0169193. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0169193.

36. Vinther JL, Conklin AI, Wareham NJ, Monsivais P. Marital transitions and associated changes in fruit and vegetable intake: findings from the population-based prospective EPIC-Norfolk cohort, UK. Soc. Sci. Med. 2016;157:120-6.

37. Werneck AO, Winpenny EM, Foubister C, et al. Cohabitation and marriage during the transition between adolescence and emerging adulthood: A systematic review of changes in weight-related outcomes, diet and physical activity. Prev Med Rep. 2020;20:101261. doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101261.

38. Kim A, Lee JA, Park HS. Health behaviors and illness according to marital status in middle-aged Koreans. J Public Health (Oxf). 2018;40(2):e99-e106. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdx071.

39. Jaremka LM, Belury MA, Andridge RR, et al. Novel Links between Troubled Marriages and Appetite Regulation: Marital Distress, Ghrelin, and Diet Quality. Clin Psychol Sci. 2016;4(3):363-75. doi:10.1177/2167702615593714.

40. Boing AF, Subramanian SV, Boing AC. Association between area-level education and the co-occurrence of behavior-related risk factors: a multilevel analysis. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2019;22:e190052. doi:10.1590/1980-549720190052.

41. Ruggiero E, Bonaccio M, Di Castelnuovo A, et al.; INHES Study Investigators. Consumption of whole grain food and its determinants in a general Italian population: Results from the INHES study. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2019;29(6):611-20. doi:10.1016/j.numecd.2019.03.001.

42. Stea TH, Nordheim O, Bere E, et al. Fruit and vegetable consumption in Europe according to gender, educational attainment and regional affiliation-A cross-sectional study in 21 European countries. PLoS One. 2020;15(5):e0232521. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0232521.

43. Kang M, Park SY, Shvetsov YB, et al. Sex differences in sociodemographic and lifestyle factors associated with diet quality in a multiethnic population. Nutrition. 2019;66:147-52. doi:10.1016/j.nut.2018.11.022.

44. Laursen UB, Johansen MB, Joensen AM, et al. Educational level and living arrangements are associated with dietary intake of red meat and fruit/vegetables: A Danish cross-sectional study. Scand J Public Health. 2019;47(5):557-64. doi:10.1177/1403494818821482.

45. López-Olmedo N, Popkin BM, Mendez MA, Taillie LS. The association of overall diet quality with BMI and waist circumference by education level in Mexican men and women. Public Health Nutr. 2019;22(15):2777-92. doi:10.1017/S136898001900065X.

46. Zajacova A, Lawrence EM. The Relationship Between Education and Health: Reducing Disparities Through a Contextual Approach. Annu Rev Public Health. 2018;39:273-89. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044628.

47. López-Olmedo N, Popkin BM, Gordon-Larsen P, Taillie LS. Cross-sectional association between diet quality and cardiometabolic risk by education level in Mexican adults. Public Health Nutr. 2020;23(2):264-74. doi:10.1017/S1368980019001678.

48. Mafugu T. Assessment of high school learners’ familiarity with nutrition education principles. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2020. doi:10.1038/s41430-020-00712-5.