Dynamics of resistant hypertension in the postoperative period of carotid endarterectomy with and without carotid body saving
https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2021-4253
Abstract
Aim. To analyze the results of multicenter study on dynamics of resistant hypertension (RH) in patients after various types of carotid endarterectomy (CE) with and without carotid body saving
Material and methods. During the period from January 2010 to December 2020, 1827 patients with hemodynamically significant stenosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA) and RH were operated on. Depending on CE type, the two groups were selected. Group 1 (n=1135; 62,2%) consisted of patients received glomus-saving surgery: 19,2% (n=351) -conventional CE with a patch repair of reconstitution point; 13,6% (n=248) — glomus-saving CE sensu R. A. Vinogradov; 7,3% (n=133) — glomus-saving CE sensu K. A. Antsupov; 11,7% (n=214) — glomus-saving CE sensu A. N. Kazantsev; 4,6% (n=84) — Chick-Chirik CE; 5,7% (n=105) — swallow tail type patch repair sensu R. I. Izhbuldin. Group 2 (n=692; 37,8%) consisted of patients received CE without glomus saving: 18,6% (n=341) — eversion CE with carotid body cutoff; 6,3% (n=115) — CE with new bifurcation plasty; 5,85% (n=107) — autoarterial reconstruction; 7,1% (n=129) ICA autotransplantation sensu E. V. Rosseikin.
Results. The mortality rate, as well as the prevalence of myocardial infarction (MI) and ischemic strokes were comparable in groups. The incidence of hemorrhagic transformation (group 1: 0%; group 2: 0,6%; p=0,04; OR=0,06; 95% CI, 0,003-1,25) and composite endpoint (death+MI+ischemic stroke+hemorrhagic transformation) (group 1: 1,06%; group 2: 3,0%; p=0,004; odds ratio (OR)=0,34; 95% CI, 0,16-0,69) significantly differs between groups. After glomus-saving CE, the number of patients with the target blood pressure (BP) level reached 51,1% (p <0,0001; OR=0,0009; 95% CI, 6,05-15,9). The number of patients with grade II (31,1%; p<0,0001; OR=12,7; 95% CI, 10,4-15,52) and III (3,6%; p<0,0001; OR=10,26; 95% CI, 6,71-15,67) hypertension significantly decreased. In the group 2, the prevalence grade III hypertension increased (48,0%; p<0,0001; OR=0,23; 95% CI, 0,18-0,3), while the number of patients with grade I (0%; p<0,0001; OR=77,0; 95% CI, 4,71-12,58) and II (52%; p<0,0001; OR=3,06; 95% CI, 2,43-3,86) hypertension decreased.
Conclusion. Glomus-saving CE contributes to achieving target BP in patients with RH. Its removal increases the risks of labile hypertension, postoperative hypertensive crisis, hyperperfusion syndrome and hemorrhagic transformation.
About the Authors
A. N. KazantsevRussian Federation
St. Petersburg.
Competing Interests:
No
R. A. Vinogradov
Russian Federation
Krasnodar.
Competing Interests:
No
M. A. Chernyavsky
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg.
Competing Interests:
No
V. N. Kravchuk
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg.
Competing Interests:
No
D. V. Shmatov
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg.
Competing Interests:
No
A. A. Sorokin
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg.
Competing Interests:
No
A. A. Erofeev
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg.
Competing Interests:
No
V. A. Lutsenko
Russian Federation
Kemerovo.
Competing Interests:
No
R. V. Sultanov
Russian Federation
Kemerovo.
Competing Interests:
No
A. R. Shabaev
Russian Federation
Kemerovo.
Competing Interests:
No
I. M. Radzhabov
Russian Federation
Moscow.
Competing Interests:
No
G. Sh. Bagdavadze
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg.
Competing Interests:
No
N. E. Zarkua
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg.
Competing Interests:
No
V. V. Matusevich
Russian Federation
Krasnodar.
Competing Interests:
No
E. F. Vaiman
Russian Federation
Kemerovo.
Competing Interests:
No
A. I. Solobuev
Russian Federation
Kemerovo.
Competing Interests:
No
R. Yu. Leader
Russian Federation
Kemerovo.
Competing Interests:
No
V. A. Porkhanov
Russian Federation
Krasnodar.
Competing Interests:
No
G. G. Khubulava
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg.
Competing Interests:
No
References
1. National guidelines for the management of patients with brachiocephalic artery disease. Angiology and vascular surgery. 2013;(19)2:4-68. (In Russ.)
2. Kazantsev AN, Tarasov RS, Burkov NN, et al. Carotid endarterectomy: three-year follow-up in a single-center registry. Angiology and vascular surgery. 2018;24(3):101-8. (In Russ.)
3. 2017 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral arterial diseases, in collaboration with the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2018;(8):164-221. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2018-8-164-221.
4. Kazantsev AN, Tarasov RS, Burkov NN, et al. Hospital results of percutaneous coronary intervention and carotid endarterectomy in hybrid and phased modes. Angiology and vascular surgery. 2019;25(1):101-7. (In Russ.) doi:10.33529/angio2019114.
5. 2018 ESC/EACTS recommendations for myocardial revascularization 2018. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2019;(8):151-226. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2019-8-151-226.
6. Fokin AA, Treiger GA, Vladimirsky VV. Evaluation of the effect of preserving the nerves of the carotid glomus on the compensation of autonomic dysregulations and central hemodynamics during the reconstruction of the carotid arteries. Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Hospital. 2018;42(4):16-20. (In Russ.)
7. Antsupov KA, Lavrentiev AV, Vinogradov OA, et al. Features of the glomus-saving eversion carotid endarterectomy technique. Angiology and vascular surgery. 2011;17(2):119-23. (In Russ.)
8. Vachev AN, Frolova EV, Nefedova DV. The course of resistant arterial hypertension in the long-term period after carotid endarterectomy. Angiology and Vascular Surgery. 2017;23(1):170-4. (In Russ.)
9. Vinogradov RA, Matusevich VV. The use of glomuss-saving techniques in carotid artery surgery. Angiology and vascular surgery. 2018;24(2):201-5. (In Russ.)
10. Kazantsev AN, Chernykh KP, Zarkua NE, et al. “Chik-chirik” carotid endarterectomy. Bulletin of the A. N. Bakuleva RAMS. 2020;21(4):414-28. (In Russ.) doi:10.24022/1810-0694-2020-21-4-414-428.
11. Vinogradov RA, Matusevich VV. Results of the use of glomus-sparing carotid endarterectomy. Medical Bulletin of the North Caucasus. 2017;12(4):467-8. (In Russ.) doi:10.14300/mnnc.2017.12130.
12. Kazantsev AN, Chernykh KP, Zarkua NE, et al. A new method of glomus-sparing carotid endarterectomy according to A. N. Kazantsev: cutting off the internal carotid artery at the site from the external and common carotid artery. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020;25(8):3851. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2020-3851.
13. Vinogradov RA, Matusevich VV. Antihypertensive benefits of glomus-sparing carotid endarterectomy in the early postoperative period. Post-graduate doctor. 2017;85(6):4-9. (In Russ.)
14. Kazantsev AN, Chernykh KP, Leader RYu, et al. Glomus-sparing carotid endarterectomy according to A. N. Kazantsev. Hospital and mid-term results. Circulatory pathology and cardiac surgery. 2020;24(3):70-9. (In Russ.) doi:10.21688/1681-3472-2020-3-70-79.
15. Kazantsev AN, Chernykh KP, Leader RYu, et al. Emergency glomus-sparing carotid endarterectomy according to A. N. Kazantsev. Journal them. N. V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine. 2020;9(4):494-503. (In Russ.) doi:10.23934/2223-9022-2020-4-494-503.
16. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, et al. 2018 Practice Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension. Blood Press. 2018;27(6):314-40. doi:10.1080/08037051.2018.1527177.
17. Ripp TM, Mordovin VF. Recommendations of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Arterial Hypertension 2018 on new methods of treating hypertension — “DEVICE-BASED TREATMENT”. Arterial hypertension. 2018;24(6):623-7. (In Russ.) doi:10.18705/1607-419X-2018-24-6-623-627.
18. Frolova EV. Operation of carotid endarterectomy in patients with resistant arterial hypertension. Clinical physiology of blood circulation. 2018;15(4):261-6. (In Russ.)
19. Kosacheva NB, Tuev AV, Agafonov AV, et al. Comparative characteristics of blood pressure in arterial hypertension in patients with carotid artery stenosis before and after surgical treatment. Arterial hypertension. 2010;16(4):396-400. (In Russ.) doi:10.18705/1607-419X-2010-16-4-396-400.
20. Ignatenko PV, Gostev AA, Novikova OA, et al. Dynamics of hemodynamic parameters in different types of carotid endarterectomy in the immediate and late postoperative period in patients with stenosing carotid atherosclerosis. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2020;19(5):2381. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1728-8800-2020-2381.
21. Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension. Final results of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). SHEP Cooperative Research Group. JAMA. 1991;265(24):3255-64.
22. Tsujimoto T, Kajio H. Thiazide Use and Decreased Risk of Heart Failure in Nondiabetic Patients Receiving Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment. Hypertension. 2020;76(2):432-41. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15154.
23. Gavrilenko AV, Al-Yousef NN, Bulatova LR. The expediency of preserving the carotid glomus during surgical interventions on the carotid arteries. Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2019;12(2):95-9. (In Russ.) doi:10.17116/kardio20191202195.
24. Kazantsev AN, Chernykh KP, Zarkua NE, et al. Carotid endarterectomy in extended lesions: the formation of a new bifurcation according to AV Pokrovsky or autoarterial reconstruction according to AA Karpenko? Research and practice in medicine. 2020;7(3):33-42. (In Russ.) doi:10.17709/2409-2231-2020-7-3-3.
25. Rosseikin EV, Voevodin AB, Radzhabov DA, et al. Internal carotid artery autotransplantation in patients with high prevalence of atherosclerotic plaque. Angiology and Vascular Surgery. 2017;23(1):104-10. (In Russ.)
26. Matveev DV, Kuznetsov MR, Matveev AD, et al. Reperfusion syndrome. Current state of the problem. Angiology and Vascular Surgery. 2020;26(4):176-83. (In Russ.) doi:10.33529/ANGIO2020421.
27. Smith BL. Hypertension following carotid endarterectomy: the role of cerebral renin production. J Vasc Surg. 1984;1:623-7. doi:10.1016/0741-5214(84)90126-5.
28. Ahn SS, Marcus DR, Moore WS. Post-carotid endarterectomy hypertension: association with elevated cranial norepinephrine. J Vasc Surg. 1989;9:351-60. doi:10.1016/0741-5214(89)90056-6.
29. Bove EL, Fry WJ, Gross WS, et al. Hypotension and hypertension as consequences of baroreceptor dysfunction following carotid endarterectomy. Surgery. 1979;85:633-7. doi:10.1007/s00104-017-0502-4.
30. Gottlieb A, Satariano-Hayden P, Schoenwald P, et al. The effects of carotid sinus nerve blockade on hemodynamic stability after carotid endarterectomy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1997;11:67-71. doi:10.1016/S1053-0770(97)90256-1.
31. Demirel S, Goossen K, Bruijnen H, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of postcarotid endarterectomy hypertension after eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg. 2017;65(3):868-82. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2016.10.087.
32. Mehta M, Rahmani O, Dietzek AM, et al. Eversion technique increases the risk for post-carotid endarterectomy hypertension. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34:839-45. doi:10.1067/mva.2001.118817.
33. Ignatenko PV, Gostev AA, Saaya ShB, et al. Autoarterial remodeling of the bifurcation of the common carotid artery in the treatment of stenotic lesions. Angiology and Vascular Surgery. 2020;26(1):82-8. (In Russ.) doi:10.33529/ANGIO2020117.
34. Marrocco-Trischitta MM, Cremona G, Lucini D, et al. Peripheral baroreflex and chemoreflex function after eversion carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58(1):136-44.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2012.11.130.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Kazantsev A.N., Vinogradov R.A., Chernyavsky M.A., Kravchuk V.N., Shmatov D.V., Sorokin A.A., Erofeev A.A., Lutsenko V.A., Sultanov R.V., Shabaev A.R., Radzhabov I.M., Bagdavadze G.Sh., Zarkua N.E., Matusevich V.V., Vaiman E.F., Solobuev A.I., Leader R.Yu., Porkhanov V.A., Khubulava G.G. Dynamics of resistant hypertension in the postoperative period of carotid endarterectomy with and without carotid body saving. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2021;26(4):4253. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2021-4253