Clinical audit of pre- and postnatal diagnostics of obstructive congenital left heart defects at the perinatal center (level III)
https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2020-3788
Abstract
Aim. To compare the data of pre- and postnatal expert echocardiographic diagnostics of obstructive left heart defects (LHD) to identify a possible predictors and reasons for hypo- and overdiagnosis of this.
Material and methods. A retrospective analysis of data from expert echocardiography of 194 fetuses and newborns with suspected obstructive LHD (coarctation of the aorta (CA), interruption of the aortic arch, aortic stenosis (AS), CA or interruption of the aortic arch with AS, hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS)) was performed.
Results. After birth, critical obstructive LHD was confirmed in 59,3% of newborns (115 out of 194): in cases of prenatally diagnosed CA — in 41% of children (42 out of 103); AS — in 67% (4 out of 6); CA with AS — in 65,9% (27 out of 41); HLHS — in 93,9% (39 out of 44); or interruption of the aortic arch with and without AS — in 100% (11 out of 11). After birth, the discrepancy in diagnoses of critical congenital heart defects was detected in 2 cases — obstructive LHD were not confirmed, but total anomalous pulmonary venous drainage (APVD) was detected. In children with a confirmed diagnosis of HLHS after birth, there was a hypodiagnosis of obstructive forms of APVD in three newborns.
Conclusion. The probability of confirming a critical obstructive LHD after birth is higher, the more LHD were hypoplasized during intrauterine imaging. APVD may be “hemodynamically masked” as HLHS when prenatal echocardiography is performed. The combination of HLHS and obstructive forms of APVD can lead to HLHS “hemodynamic aggravation” due to an additional decrease in blood flow of left heart.
Keywords
About the Authors
O. V. ShumakovaRussian Federation
Moscow
E. L. Bokeria
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Heron M. Deaths: Leading Causes for 2014. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2016;65(5):1-96.
2. Оster ME, Lee KA, Honein MA et al. Temporal trends in survival among infants with critical congenital heart defects. Pediatrics. 2013;131(5):e1502-8. doi:10.1542/peds.2012-3435.
3. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Coarctation of the aorta. Interruption of the aortic arch. Hypoplasia of the aortic arch. In: Pediatric cardiac surgery: A Guide for physicians. Moscow; 2016. (In Russ.) 684-699,759-784. ISBN: 978-5-7982-0356-7.
4. Friedberg MK, Silverman NH, Moon-Grady AJ, et al. Prenatal detection of congenital heart disease. J Pediatr. 2009;155(1):26-31, 31.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.01.050.
5. Bespalova ED, Suratova OG, Bokeriya EL, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of cardiac abnormalities in the fetus. 2015; 244p. (In Russ.) ISBN: 978-5-7982-0339-0.
6. Hirano Y, Masuyama H, Hayata K, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of interrupted aortic arch: Usefulness of three-vessel and four-chamber views. Acta Med Okayama. 2016;70(6):485-91. doi:10.18926/AMO/54812.
7. Freud LR, Moon-Grady A, Escobar-Diaz MC, et al. Low Rate of Prenatal Diagnosis among Neonates with Critical Aortic Stenosis: Insight into the Natural History In Utero (Aortic Stenosis). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45(3):326-32. doi:10.1002/uog.14667.
8. Marek J, Tomek V, Skovranek J, et al. Prenatal ultrasound screening of congenital heart disease in an unselected national population: a 21-year experience. Heart. 2011;97:12430, doi:10.1136/hrt/2010206623.
9. Sun HY, Proudfoot JA, McCandless RT. Prenatal detection of critical cardiac outflow tract anomalies remains suboptimal despite revised obstetrical imaging guidelines. Congenit Heart Dis. 2018;00:1-9. doi:10.1111/chd.12648.
10. Li Y, Hua Y, Fang J, et al. Performance of different scan protocols of fetal echocardiography in the diagnosis of fetal congenital heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e65484. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065484.
11. Bokerija EL. Perinatal cardiology: the present and the future. Part I: congenital heart disease. Rossiyskiy Vestnik Perinatologii i Pediatrii (Russian Bulletin of Perinatology and Pediatrics). 2019;64(3):5-10. (In Russ.) doi:10.21508/1027-4065-2019-64-35-10.
12. Jonas RA. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome. In: Jonas RA, ed. Comprehensive surgical management of congenital heart disease. London/Hodder Arnold; 2004:341-54. ISBN: 978-0-340-80807-8.
13. Cohen MS, Rychik J, Bush DM, et al. Influence of congenital heart disease on survival in children with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr. 2002;141(1):25-30. doi:10.1067/mpd.2002.125004.
14. Baryshnikova IYu, Filippova EA, Podurovskaya YuL, et al. Aortic coarctation in newborn babies with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Detskaya khirurgiya (Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery). 2017;21(2):110-11. doi:10.18821/1560-9510-2017-212-110-111.
Review
For citations:
Shumakova O.V., Bokeria E.L. Clinical audit of pre- and postnatal diagnostics of obstructive congenital left heart defects at the perinatal center (level III). Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020;25(8):3788. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2020-3788