Left ventricular remodelling early after surgical correction of mitral regurgitation: stroke volume maintenance

Aim. Mitral valve surgery results in the left ventricular (LV) remodelling and adjustment to the new preload and afterload. This study evaluated the dynamics ofLVgeometry and function immediately after surgical correction of mitral valve (MV) degenerative prolapse.

Material and methods. This prospective study included 40 patients: 25 after MV surgery and 15 after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The latter group served as controls, in order to assess potential impact of cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest onLV function. All participants underwent intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography, before and after cardiopulmonary bypass, after protamine infusion and hemodynamic stabilisation. Simultaneous pulmonary catheterisation ensured that the echocardiographic data were obtained in similar hemodynamic conditions.

Results. Immediately after MV surgery,LV fractional area change decreased from 65±7% to 52±% (p<0,001). End-diastolic LV area decreased from 21,3±5,3 to 19,4±4,5 cm 2 (p=0,005), while end-systolic LV area increased from 7,5±2,3 to 9,3±2,5 cm 2 (p<0,001). Stroke volume, measured by the thermodilution method, did not change (54±12% and 57±0%; p=0,5). In the control group,LV fractional area change (54±12% and 57±10%; p=0,19), end-diastolicLV area (16,6±6,2 and 15,7±5,0 cm 2; p=0,32), and stroke volume (72±29 and 65±19 ml; p=0,15) were similar before and after cardiopulmonary bypass; there was only some reduction in end-systolicLVarea (7,9±4,4 and 6,9±3,2 cm 2; p=0,03).

Conclusion. Early after MR surgery,LV fractional area change statistically decreased, primarily due to an increase in end-systolicLVdimensions. It could be one of the compensatory mechanisms to prevent acute increase in stroke volume and subsequent MR after MV surgery.

1. Moreo A., Gordini V., Ciliberto G. R. et al. Left ventricular performance in chronic mitral regurgitation: temporal response to valve repair and prognostic value of early postoperative echocardiographic parameters. Ital Heart J. 2000; 1:122–7.

2. Leung D. Y., Griffin B. P., Stewart W. J. et al. Left ventricular function after valve repair for chronic mitral regurgitation: predictive value of preoperative assessment of contractile reserve by exercise echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996; 28:1198–205.

3. Suri R. M., Schaff H. V., Dearani J. A. et al. Determinants of early decline in ejection fraction after surgical correction of mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008; 136:442–7.

4. Rozich J. D., Carabello B. A., Usher B. W. et al. Mitral valve replacement with and without chordal preservation in patients with chronic mitral regurgitation: mechanisms for differences in postoperative ejection performance. Circulation. 1992; 86:1718–26.

5. Enriquez-Sarano M., Tajik A. J., Schaff H. V. et al. Echocardiographic prediction of left ventricular function after correction of mitral regurgitation: results and clinical implications. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994; 24:1536–43.

6. Goldfine H., Aurigemma G. P., Zile M. R. et al. Left ventricular length-force-shortening relations before and after surgical correction of chronic mitral regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 31:180–5.

7. Yun K. L., Sintek C. F., Miller D. C. et al. Randomized trial comparing partial versus complete chordal-sparing mitral valve replacement: effects on left ventricular volume and function. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002; 123:707–14.

8. Hennein H. A., Swain J. A., McIntosh C. L. et al. Comparative assessment of chordal preservation versus chordal resection during mitral valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1990; 99:828–36.

9. Chowdhury U. K., Kumar A. S., Airan B. et al. Mitral valve replacement with and without chordal preservation in a rheumatic population: serial echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular size and function. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005; 79:1926–33.

10. Bonchek L. I., Olinger G. N., Siegel R. et al. Left ventricular performance after mitral reconstruction for mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1984; 88:122–7.

11. Corin W. J., Sutsch G., Murakami T. et al. Left ventricular function in chronic mitral regurgitation: preoperative and postoperative comparison. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 25:113–21.

12. Kouris N., Ikonomidis I., Kontogianni D. et al. Mitral valve repair versus replacement for isolated non-ischemic mitral regurgitation in patients with preoperative left ventricular dysfunction: a long-term follow-up echocardiography study. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2005; 6:435–42.

13. Schaff H. V., Suri R. M., Enriquez-Sarano M. Indications for surgery in degenerative mitral valve disease. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007; 19:97–102.

14. Suri R. M., Schaff H. V., Dearani J. A., et al. Survival advantage and improved durability of mitral repair for leaflet prolapse subsets in the current era. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006; 82:819–26.

15. Sivarajan M. Systolic left ventricular function. In: Sidebotham D, Merry A, Legget M, editors. Practical perioperative transoesophageal echocardiography. New York: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2003. p. 101–15.

16. Schmidlin D., Aschkenasy S., Vogt P. R. et al. Left ventricular pressure-area relations as assessed by transoesophageal echocardiographic automated border detection: comparison with conductance catheter technique in cardiac surgical patients. Br J Anaesth. 2000; 85:379–88.

17. Shanewise J. S., Cheung A. T., Aronson S. et al. ASE/SCA guidelines for performing a comprehensive intraoperative multiplane transesophageal echocardiography examination: recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography Council for Intraoperative Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Task Force for Certification in Perioperative Transesophageal Echocardiography. Anesth Analg. 1999; 89:870–84.

18. Domanski M. J., Colleran J. A., Cunnion R. E., Nanda N. C. et al. Correlation of echocardiographic fractional area change with radionuclide left ventricular ejection fraction. Echocardiogr. 1995; 12:221–7.

19. Dubroff J. M., Clark M. B., Wong C. Y. et al. Left ventricular ejection fraction during cardiac surgery: a two-dimensional echocardiographic study. Circulation. 1983; 68:95–103.

20. Aybek T., Kahn M. F., Dogan S., et al. Cardiopulmonary bypass impairs left ventricular function determined by conductance catheter measurement. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003; 51:301–5.

21. Pasque M. K. Mathematic modeling and cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002; 123:617–20.

22. Mehta R. H., Supiano M. A., Grossman P. M., et al. Changes in systemic sympathetic nervous system activity after mitral valve surgery and their relationship to changes in left ventricular size and systolic performance in patients with mitral regurgitation. Am Heart J. 2004; 147:729–35.

23. Mehta RH, Supiano MA, Oral H, et al. Relation of systemic sympathetic nervous system activation to echocardiographic left ventricular size and performance and its implications in patients with mitral regurgitation. Am J Cardiol. 2000; 86:1193–7.

24. Haque A., Otsuji Y., Yoshifuku S, et al. Effects of valve dysfunction on Doppler Tei index. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002; 15:877–83.

25. Mabrouk-Zerguini N., Leger P., Aubert S., et al. Tei index to assess perioperative left ventricular systolic function in patients undergoing mitral valve repair. Br J Anaesth. 2008; 101:479–85.