“Valve-On-Valve” — an alternative method of surgical treatment of tissue valve dysfunctions
https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2019-8-140-149
Abstract
Every year, the frequency of use of biological prostheses for treatment of valvular heart disease increases.
The implantation of a biological prosthesis allows avoiding lifelong anticoagulant therapy, but at the same time it may require further replacement due to the dysfunction development.
Traditional reoperation is associated with a certain risk of trauma to various structures and cardiac chambers during explantation of non-functioning valve.
Transcatheter replacement of the prosthesis (“valve-in-valve”) is not always realizable due to lack of routes for the delivery system and small diameter of the initial valve.
“Valve-in-valve” is not always demanded because it does not provide an option to choose mechanical or biological prosthesis.Valve-on-valve implantation technique implies that the new prosthesis is implanted in the carcass of the previous valve. It allows avoiding severe intraoperative complications, reducing the duration of the main stage of the surgery and adverse events in the early postoperative period, and provide an option to choose implantable device.
In this review, the authors attempted to comprehensively evaluate the world experience in applying the “valve-on-valve” technique.
Keywords
biological prostheses of heart valves,
bioprosthesis dysfunctions,
reoperations,
TAVI,
VALVE-ON-VALVE
Supporting agencies: This work was supported by a program of basic scientific research of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences within the framework of the fundamental project of Research Institute for Complex Cardiovascular Problems № 0546-2015-0011 “Pathogenetic substantiation of the development of cardiovascular surgery implants based on biocompatible materials, with the implementation of a patient-oriented approach using mathematical modeling, tissue engineering and genomic predictors”.
About the Authors
N. V. Rogulina
Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases
Russian Federation
Kemerovo
Russian Federation
Kemerovo
I. K. Khalivopulo
Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases
Russian Federation
Kemerovo
Russian Federation
Kemerovo
References
1. Gammie JS, Chikwe J, Badhwar V, et al. Isolated Mitral Valve Surgery: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database Analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018; 106:716-27. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.03.086.
2. Kim KM, Shannon F, Paone G, et al. Evolving trends in aortic valve replacement: A statewide experience. J Card Surg. 2018;33:424-30. doi:10.1111/jocs.13740.
3. Zack CJ, Fender EA, Chandrashekar P, et al. National Trends and Outcomes in Isolated Tricuspid Valve Surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:2953-60. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.039.
4. Bokeriya LA, Milievskaya EB, Kudzoeva ZF, et al. Cardiovascular Surgery 2017. Diseases and congenital anomalies of the circulatory system. Bakulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery Press; 2018:58-60. (In Russ.) ISBN 978-5-7982-0389-5.
5. Bokeriya LA, Gudkova RG. Cardiovascular surgery-2005. Diseases and congenital anomalies of the circulatory system. Bakulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery Press. 2006:34-6. (In Russ.) ISBN: 5-7982-0179-1.
6. Bokeriya LA, Gudkova RG. Cardiovascular surgery-2010. Diseases and congenital anomalies of the circulatory system. Bakulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery Press; 2011:49-50. (In Russ.) ISBN: 978-5-7982-0290-4.
7. Shcherbakova ЕМ. Population aging: global trends, 2013. Demoscope Weekly. 2014;601-2. (In Russ.) URL:http://demoscope.ru/weekly/2014/0601/barometer601.pdf.
8. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision — http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/
9. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for Col Cardiol. 2017;15:252-89. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.011.
10. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Kanu C, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart As-sociation Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing Committee to Revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease) developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2006;114:e84-231.
11. Falk V, Baumgartner H, Bax JJ, et al. 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;52:616-64.
12. Niclauss L, von Segesser LK, Ferrari E, et al. Aortic biological valve prosthesis in patients younger than 65 years of age: transition to a flexible age limit? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013; 16:501-7. doi:10.1093/icvts/ivs514.
13. Silaschi M, Conradi L, Treede H, et al. Trends in Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in More Than 3,000 Consecutive Cases in the Era of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantations. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;64:382-9. doi:10.1055/s-0035-1564615.
14. Barbarash LS, Rogulina NV, Odarenko Yu N, et al. On the question of the tactics of choosing a prosthesis for the mitral position: a comparative assessment of 16-year results of the use of the mechanical prosthesis “MIKS” and the biological prosthesis “KemCore”. Russian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2012;2:15-9. (In Russ.)
15. Barbarash LS, Rogulina NV, Odarenko YuN, et al. Ten years of experience in the use of prostheses “MedEng-2” and “PeriCor” in mitral valve disease surgery. Russian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2013;6:25-33. (In Russ.)
16. Kamioka N, Babaliaros V, Morse MA, et al. Comparison of clinical and echocardiographic outcomes after surgical redo mitral valve replacement and transcatheter mitral valve-invalve therapy. JACC Intv. 2018;11:1131-8.
17. Stassano P, Losi MA, Golino A, et al. Bioprosthesis replacement with mechanical valve implantation on the bioprosthetic ring. Surgical and 2D echo considerations. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1993;7:507-10.
18. Geha AS, Massad MG, Snow NJ, et al. Replacement of degenerated mitral and aortic bioprostheses without explantation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:1509-14.
19. Raffa H, Al-Ibrahim K, Sorefan AA, et al. Superimposition of a mechanical valve on an impacted aortic bioprosthesis. Tex Heart Inst J. 1991;18:199-201.
20. Campanella C, Hider CF, Duncan AJ, et al. Must the mitral valve always be removed during prosthetic replacement? Ann Thorac Surg. 1990;49:167-68.
21. Paterson HS, Jacob A, Campanella C, et al. Retention of bioprosthetic valve annulus in mitral prosthetic replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1993;7:511-13. doi:10.1016/10107940(93)90047-F.
22. Virmani R, Chun PKC, Parker J, et al. Suture obliteration of the circumflex coronary artery in three patients undergoing mitral valve operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1982;83:773-8.
23. Grande АМ, Fiore А, Massetti М, et al. Iatrogenic Circumflex Coronary Lesion in Mitral Valve Surgery. Texas Heart Institute Journal. 2008;35:179-83.
24. Egbe AC, Poterucha JT, Rihal CS, et al. Transcatheter closure of postmyocardial infarction, iatrogenic, and postoperative ventricular septal defects: The Mayo Clinic experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Dec 1;86:1264-70. doi:10.1002/ccd.25989.
25. Khaled E, Al-Ebrahim К. Superimposition or Valve-on-Valve Technique for Impacted. JKAU: Med. Sci. 2008;15:67-71.
26. Al-Ebrahim K. Valve-in-valve or superimposition of mechanical valves on impacted bioprostheses. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1997;12:162-63.
27. Bloomfield P, Wheatley DJ, Prescott RJ, et al. Twelve year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprosthesis. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:573-9.
28. Nazarov VM, Zheltovskiy YV, Zheleznev SI, et al. Prevention of left ventricle posterior wall rupture in mitral valve replacement. Siberian Medical Journal. 2013;6:25-40. (In Russ.)
29. Abdullaev FZ, Abbasov FE, Heybatov ID, et al. Predictors of risk and modern principles of correction of the left ventricular posterior wall ruptures after mitral valve replacement (literature review and personal observation). Russian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2011;2:23-9. (In Russ.).
30. Yamaguchi A. Left Ventricular Rupture following Mitral Valve Replacement. Kyobu Geka. 2015;68:596-602.
31. Schneider YA, Tsoi MD, Antipov G.N, et al. Experience of Treatment of Spontaneous Rupture of Left Ventricular Posterior Wall After Mitral Valve Replacement. Kardiologiia. 2017;57(5):85-90. (In Russ.) doi:10.18565/cardio.2017.5.85-90.
32. Dziubek M, Pierrakos C, Chebli L, et al. Para-prosthetic Leaks Following Mitral Valve Replacement: Case Analysis on a 20-year Period. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2018;14(1):15-24. doi:10.2174/1573403X13666171110110344.
33. Geha AS, Lee JH. Evolution of the surgical approach for replacement of degenerated mitral bioprostheses. Surgery. 1995;118:662-68.
34. Geha AS, Lee JH. New approach for replacement of degenerated mitral bioprostheses. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1996;10:1090-96.
35. Stassano P, Musumeci A, Losi MA, et al. Mid-term results of the valve-on-valve technique for bioprosthetic failure. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;18:453-57.
36. Sakakibara Y, Moriki N, Dоi T, et al. Implantation of a mechanical valve within the orifice of a mitral bioprosthesis in a case with severely calcified left atrium-a case report. Angiology. 1998;49:857-60. doi:10.1177/000331979804900910.
37. Tamura Y, Kawata T, Kameda Y, et al. Re-do mitral valve replacement using the valve-onvalve technique: a case report. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;11:125-7.
38. Tateishi M, Koide M, Kunii Y, et al. Valve-in-valve replacement of primary tissue valve failure of bovine pericardial valve. Kyobu Geka. 2006;59:61-4.
39. Furukawa T, Komiya T, Tamura N, et al. Replacement of a degenerated mitral bioprosthesis using a valve-on-valve technique (in Japanese with English abstract). Jpn J Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;36:58-62.
40. Miyairi S, Koide M, Kunii Y, et al. Redo mitral valve replacement using the valveon-valve method. Asian Cardiovascular & Thoracic Annals. 2015;23:707-9. doi:10.1177/0218492314524206.
41. Midorikawa H, Satou K, Ogawa T, et al. Valve-on-valve technique for replacement of degenerated tricuspid bioprosthetic valve without explantation. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;54(2):81-4. doi:10.1007/BF02744607.
42. Santana O, Tarrazzi FA, Lamelas J. Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Replacement Using the Valve-in-valve Technique. Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery. 2009;4:222-4. doi:10.1097/IMI.0b013e3181b02871.
43. Barbarash LS, Stasev AN, Kokorin SG, et al. Immediate results of mitral valve-in-valve implantation for bioprosthetic valve dysfunction. Circulatory pathology and cardiac surgery. 2015;19:36-41. (In Russ.) doi:10.21688/1681-3472-2015-2-36-41.
44. Shibata T, Inoue K, Ikuta T, et al. Which valve and which size should we use in the valveon-valve technique for re-do mitral valve surgery? Interact. сardiovasc.Thorac. Surg. 2009;8:206-10. doi:10.1510/icvts.2008.187666.
45. Chang J-P, Kao C-L, Tsai K-Ton, et al. Conduit-on-Valve Replacement of a Degenerated Mitral Bioprosthesis With a Bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75:1987-9.
46. Inoue Y, Kotani S, Suzuki S. Chimney technique for aortic valve-on-valve replacement. J horac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;155:68-9. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.07.085.
47. Araiza-Garaygordobil D, Aguilar-Rojas LA, Mendoza-García S, et al. Thrombolytic treatment for acute prosthetic valve thrombosis: Is it better than surgery? J Cardiol Cases. 2017;18,6(5):162-4. doi:10.1016/j.jccase.2017.07.008.
48. Dürrleman N, Pellerin M, Bouchard D, et al. Prosthetic valve thrombosis: twenty-year experience at the Montreal Heart Institute. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127:1388-92.
49. Manoly I, Krishnan M, Hoschtitzky JA, et al. Mechanical Aortic Valve-on-Valve Replacement in Previous Bentall Procedure: An Alternate Technique. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98:e77-9. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.02.083.
50. Paradis JM, Del Trigo M, Puri R, et al. Transcatheter valve-in-valve and valve-inring for treating aortic and mitral surgical prosthetic dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:2019-37.
51. McElhinney DB, Aboulhosn JA, Dvir D, et al. Mid-Term Valve-Related Outcomes After Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve-in-Valve or Valve-in-Ring Replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:148-57. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.051.
52. Auffret V, Becerra Munoz V, Loirat A, et al. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Lower-Surgical-Risk Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Am J Cardiol. 2017;120:1863-68. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.097.
53. Ando T, Akintoye E, Trehan N, et al. Comparison of In-Hospital Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Obese (Body Mass Index ≥ 30 Kg/M2) Patients. Am J Cardiol. 2017;120:1858-62. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.098.
54. Bapat V, Pirone F, Kapetanakis S, et al. Factors Influencing Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction Following a Mitral Valve-in-Valve or Valve-in-Ring Procedure. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;86:747-60. doi:10.1002/ccd.25928.
55. Tabata M. Transapical approach in transcatheter cardiovascular interventions. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;66:185-91. doi:10.1007/s11748-018-0890-5.
Review
For citations:
Rogulina N.V., Khalivopulo I.K. “Valve-On-Valve” — an alternative method of surgical treatment of tissue valve dysfunctions. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2019;(8):140-149. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2019-8-140-149
Views:
939
Email this article 