Preview

Russian Journal of Cardiology

Advanced search

The dynamics of blood pressure within 12 months after carotid artery stenting in patients with stenotic carotid lesions

https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2019-8-17-21

Abstract

Aim. To assess the dynamics of blood pressure (BP) and determine the predictors of the hypotensive effect after carotid artery stenting (CAS).

Material and methods. The analysis included 99 patients who underwent CAS in a period of March 2014 and May 2016. Inclusion criteria: (1) the presence of 50% symptomatic or 70% asymptomatic stenosis of the carotid artery (according to NASCET criteria), (2) follow-up for at least 1 year, (3) measurement and recording of BP at four points: 24 hours before surgery, 1 hour, 24 hours and 12 months after surgery.

 Results. According to office measurement of BP, the average systolic/diastolic pressure was 117,11/60,75, 119,73/60,75, 134,75/70,48 mm Hg after 1 hour, one day and 12 months after the intervention, respectively. In comparison with the average numbers of BP before the intervention, 148,13/89,52 mm Hg there was a significantly significant decrease in BP levels after CAS (p<0,01). According to the results of daily monitoring of blood pressure, a statistically important decrease in blood pressure was observed after 1 year of observation (p<0,01) (136,52/76,84 compared with 145,91/87,63 before the intervention). Dissociated circle of Willis (odds ratio=10,37, 95% confidence interval, from 3,64 to 29,52; p<0,001) and the occurrence of intraoperative hypotension (odds ratio =3,62, 95% confidence interval, from 1,16 to 11,28; p<0,027) were predictors of a persistent decrease in BP after CAS. 

Conclusion. The obtained results indicated the need for more thorough conservative postoperative management, especially for patients with a dissociated circle of Willis. It is also necessary to achieve the target blood pressure values by individualized correction of antihypertensive therapy.

About the Authors

F. B. Shukurov
https://www.gnicpm.ru/Employee/310
National Medical Research Center for Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation
Moscow


E. S. Bulgakova
National Medical Research Center for Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation
Moscow


A. N. Shapieva
“Niarmedik”Clinic
Russian Federation
Moscow


B. А. Rudenko
National Medical Research Center for Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation
Moscow


T. V. Tvorogova
“Family” Clinic
Russian Federation
Moscow region, Lobnya


A. S. Shanoyan
National Medical Research Center for Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation
Moscow


A. Yu. Suvorov
City Clinical Hospital№ 4
Russian Federation
Moscow


D. A. Feshchenko
National Medical Research Center for Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation
Moscow


D. . S. Chigidinova
National Medical Research Center for Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation
Moscow


D. K. Vasiliev
National Medical Research Center for Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation
Moscow


A. V. Kontsevaya
National Medical Research Center for Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation
Moscow


O. M. Drapkina
National Medical Research Center for Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation
Moscow


References

1. Andreev EM, Vorobieva OD, Denisenko MB, et al. Demographic Yearbook of Russia. Moscow: Rosstat, 2017;263 (In Russ.) ISBN 978-5-89476-447-4.

2. Furie KL, Kasner SE, Adams RJ, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patientswith stroke or transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2011;227-76. doi:10.1161/STR.0b013e3181f7d043.

3. Wabnitz AM, Turan TN. Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: Surgery, Stenting, or Medical Therapy?. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2017;19(8):62. doi:10.1007/s11936-017-0564-0.

4. Dangas G., Hypotension after carotid revascularization. Stroke. 2003;34:2581-2. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000101661.72199.6E.

5. Huibers AE, Westerink J, de Vries EE, et al. Editor’s Choice. Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome After Carotid Artery Stenting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. Sep 2018;56(3):322-33. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.05.012.

6. Agadzhanyan RS. Biomechanics of the bifurcation of the carotid artery. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Scientific Session of the A. N. Bakulev cardiac center. Moscow. 2003; р.255 (In Russ.)

7. Jeon JP, Kim C, Oh BD, et al. Prediction of persistent hemodynamic depression after carotid angioplasty and stenting using artificial neural network model. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. Jan 2018;164:127-31. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.12.005.

8. Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, et al. Prospective Studies Collaboration. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet. 2002;1903-13. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11911-8.

9. Suh DC, Kim JL, Kim EH, et al. Carotid baroreceptor reaction after stenting in 2 locations of carotid bulb lesions of different embryologic origin. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;977-81. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2891.

10. Park ST, Kim JK, Yoon KH, et al. Atherosclerotic carotid stenoses of apical versus body lesions in high-risk carotid stenting patients. AJNR AmJNeuroradiol. 2010;1106-12. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2000. Epub 2010 Jan 21.

11. Carretero OA, Oparil S, Essential hypertension. Part I: definition and etiology. Circulation. 2000;101:329-35.

12. Oparil S, Schmieder RE, New approaches in the treatment of hypertension. Circ Res. 2015;116:1074-95. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.303603.

13. Oparil S, Zaman MA, Calhoun DA, Pathogenesis of hypertension. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:761-76.

14. Goldstein LB Adams R, Alberts MJ, et al, Primary prevention of ischemic stroke: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council: cosponsored by the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Interdisciplinary Working Group; Cardiovascular Nursing Council; Clinical Cardiology Council; Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism Council; and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group. Circulation. 2006;113:873-923. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000223048.70103.F1.

15. Ortega-Gutierrez S, Samaniego EA, Huang A, et al. Effect of Intracranial Stenosis Revascularization on Dynamic and Static Cerebral Autoregulation. J Vasc Interv Neurol. Jun 2018;10(1):1-6. PMC5999298.

16. Hong CK Shim YS, Lim YC, et al. Three-year follow-up of blood pressure after treating hypertensive patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Acta Neurochir (Wien). Dec 2018;158(12):2385-92. doi:10.1007/s00701-016-2990-2.

17. Chung J, Kim YB, Hong CK, el al. Blood pressure-lowering effect of carotid artery stenting in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Acta Neurochir. 2014;156:69-75. doi:10.1007/s00701-013-1928-1.

18. Santiago-Dieppa DR, Hirshman BR, Wali A. et al. The circle of Willis predicts the antihypertensive effects of carotid artery stenting. Neurosurg Focus. 2017;42(4):E18. doi:10.3171/2017.1.FOCUS16487.

19. Vachev AN, Frolova EV, Nefyodov DV. Resistant arterial hypertension on the long period follow-up after the carotid endarterectomy. Angiology and vascular surgery. 2017;23(1):170-4. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Shukurov F.B., Bulgakova E.S., Shapieva A.N., Rudenko B.А., Tvorogova T.V., Shanoyan A.S., Suvorov A.Yu., Feshchenko D.A., Chigidinova D..., Vasiliev D.K., Kontsevaya A.V., Drapkina O.M. The dynamics of blood pressure within 12 months after carotid artery stenting in patients with stenotic carotid lesions. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2019;(8):17-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2019-8-17-21

Views: 10388


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1560-4071 (Print)
ISSN 2618-7620 (Online)