Fortelyzin® in comparison with Metalyse® for ST-elevated myocardial infarction: one-year results and clinical outcomes of a multicenter randomized study FRIDOM1
https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2018-11-110-116
Abstract
Aim. Evaluate the oneyear results and clinical outcomes of a multicenter randomized clinical trial FRIDOM1.
Material and methods. The study FRIDOM1 was conducted in 11 clinical centers of the Russian Federation in the period 20142016. The study included 382 patients with acute STelevated myocardial infarction (STEMI), who were randomly divided into the Fortelyzin® and Metalyse®. Thrombolysis was accompanied by anticoagulant and dual antiplatelet therapy followed by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Oneyear patient status, allcause mortality, including cardiovascular diseases (CVD), hospitalization, and oneyear survival were assessed by telephone contact.
Results. The oneyear patient status was determined in 186 out of 191 (97,4%) in the Fortelyzin® group and in 185 out of 191 (96,9%) patients in the Metalyse® group. Oneyear allcause mortality was 5,9% and 6,5% in the Fortelyzin® and Metalyse® groups, respectively (p=0,83; OR 0,91; 95% CI — 0,421,98). Oneyear mortality from CVD in the Fortelyzin® group is 5,4%, in the Metalyse® group — 6,5% (p=0,67; OR 0,83; 95% CI — 0,371,83). Allcause mortality between 30 days and 1 year in the Fortelyzin® group was in 2,2% of patients, CVD — in 1,6%, in the group of Metalise® mortality was in 2,7% of patients (all — CVD). Oneyear survival was 94,1% and 93,5% in the Fortelyzin® and Metalyse® groups, respectively.
Conclusion. The oneyear results of the FRIDOM1 study showed the efficacy and safety of a single bolus administration of Fortelyzin® as part of a pharmacoinvasive strategy for treating patients with STEMI, as well as clinical outcomes that are comparable with Metalyse®, including high survival rates and low CVD mortality.
About the Authors
V. A. MarkovRussian Federation
Competing Interests: Received sponsorship fees for research from Beringer Ingelheim, SupraGen and lecturer fees from AstraZeneca, Beringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Sanofi, SupraGen.
D. V. Duplyakov
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Получал спонсорские гонорары за исследования от Пфайзер, СупраГен и лекторские вознаграждения от Берингер Ингельхайм, Байер, Cанофи, СупраГен.
S. L. Konstantinov
Russian Federation
Competing Interests: Received lecturer fees from AstraZeneca, Beringer Ingelheim, SupraGen.
G. V. Klein
Russian Federation
Competing Interests: Received sponsorship fees for research from Beringer Ingelheim, SupraGen and lecturer fees from AstraZeneca, Beringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Sanofi, SupraGen.
S. B. Aksentev
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Received sponsorship research fees from Sanofi, Cardiology Research Center, SupraGen, and lecturer fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, SupraGen.
D. Yu. Platonov
Russian Federation
Competing Interests: Received sponsorship fees for research from Pfizer, SupraGen and lecturer fees from Beringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Sanofi, SupraGen.
E. V. Vyshlov
Russian Federation
Competing Interests: Received sponsorship fees for research from Beringer Ingelheim, SupraGen and lecturer fees from AstraZeneca, Beringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Sanofi, SupraGen.
E. A. Ponomarev
Russian Federation
Competing Interests: Received sponsorship fees for research from SupraGen. Talibov O. B. received fees for consulting on the design and statistical processing of research results from Beringer Ingelheim, SupraGen.
R. M. Rabinovich
Russian Federation
Competing Interests: Received sponsorship fees for research from Pfizer, SupraGen and lecturer fees from Beringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Sanofi, SupraGen.
E. L. Makarov
Russian Federation
Competing Interests: Received sponsorship fees for research from Beringer Ingelheim, SupraGen and lecturer fees from AstraZeneca, Beringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Sanofi, SupraGen.
E. V. Kulibaba
Russian Federation
Competing Interests: Received lecturer fees from AstraZeneca, Beringer Ingelheim, SupraGen.
D. S. Yunevich
Russian Federation
Competing Interests: Received sponsorship fees for research from SupraGen. Talibov O. B. received fees for consulting on the design and statistical processing of research results from Beringer Ingelheim, SupraGen.
O. V. Kritskaia
Russian Federation
Competing Interests: Received sponsorship fees for research from SupraGen. Talibov O. B. received fees for consulting on the design and statistical processing of research results from Beringer Ingelheim, SupraGen.
E. A. Baranov
Russian Federation
Competing Interests: Received sponsorship fees for research from SupraGen. Talibov O. B. received fees for consulting on the design and statistical processing of research results from Beringer Ingelheim, SupraGen.
O. B. Talibov
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Получал гонорары за консультации по разработке дизайна и статистическую обработку результатов исследований от Берингер Ингельхайм, СупраГен.
E. A. Gerasimets
Russian Federation
Competing Interests: Is a medical advisor of SupraGen.
References
1. Clinical guidelines Diagnosis and management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction // Kardiologicheskij Vestnik. 2014, № 4: 5-60.
2. Work group ESC. 2017 ESC Guidelines for themanagtment of acutemyocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation Rus J Cardiol 2017; 23(5): 103-158
3. Markov V.A., Duplyakov D.V., Konstantinov S.L., Klein H.V., Aksentiev S.B., Platonov D. Ju., Vyashlov Eu.V., Ponomarev Ed.A., Rabinovich R.M., Makarov Eu.L., Kulibaba E.V., Krickaya O.V., Baranov Eu.A., Talibov O.B., Gerasimetc E.A. FORTELYZIN® VERSUS METALYSE® IN ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: RESULTS OF MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED trial FRIDOM 1.
4. Armstrong P.W., Gershlick A.H., Goldstein P. et al. Fibrinolysis or Primary PCI in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction // N Engl J Med 2013; 368:1379–87.
5. Peter R. Sinnaeve, Paul W. Armstrong, Anthony H. Gershlick Patrick Goldstein et al. ST–Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Randomized to a Pharmaco-Invasive Strategy or Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Strategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction (STREAM) 1-Year Mortality Follow-Up // Circulation. 2014;130:1139–1145.
6. Инструкция по медицинскому применению препарата Фортелизин®.
7. Markov V.A., Vyshlov E.V., Karpov R.S. Coronary reperfusion in ST elevation myocardial infarction: problems and solutions. Russ J Cardiol 2015, № 1 (117): 53-58.
8. Fedorov A.V., Belova L.P. The principles of organization of aid and pre-hospital thrombolysis patients with acute coronary syndrome in the Chuvash Republic. Emergency medical care. 2017;18(3):39-43.
9. Mazur E.S., Rabinovich R.M., Mazur V.V., Kuznetsova N.S. et al. The results of use of new native thrombolytic in clinical practice // Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology 2016; 12(2):160-165.
10. Vishlov E.V., Alekseeva Ya.V., Gerasimets E.A., Markov V.A. Experimental and clinical studies of staphylokinase and Fortelyzin®. Kardiologija 2017; 2:57-61.
11. Khripun A.V., Malevanny M.V., Kulikovskikh Ya.V., Kastanyan A.A. In-patient outcomes of pharmacoinvasive reperfusion strategy for ST elevation // Rus J Cardiol 2016, 3(131): 99-104.
12. Valeriy B. Kostogryz Results of Hospital Use of Recombinant Non-Immunogenic Staphylokinase in Patients with ST-Elevated Myocardial Infarction 2017, 13(1), 51-54.
Review
For citations:
Markov V.A., Duplyakov D.V., Konstantinov S.L., Klein G.V., Aksentev S.B., Platonov D.Yu., Vyshlov E.V., Ponomarev E.A., Rabinovich R.M., Makarov E.L., Kulibaba E.V., Yunevich D.S., Kritskaia O.V., Baranov E.A., Talibov O.B., Gerasimets E.A. Fortelyzin® in comparison with Metalyse® for ST-elevated myocardial infarction: one-year results and clinical outcomes of a multicenter randomized study FRIDOM1. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2018;(11):110-116. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2018-11-110-116