EFFICACY OF ISCHEMIC STROKE PREVENTION IN PATIENTS WITH IMPLANTED OCCLUDER OF THE LEFT ATRIUM. FIVE YEAR FOLLOW-UP
https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2018-7-16-20
Abstract
Aim. In the study we set an aim to evaluate the rate of thromboembolic complications in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with implanted occluding device of the left atrium appendage (LAA).
Material and methods. Beginning at 2012, in the study center, 102 LAA occluders were implanted, of those 44 Watchman device (Boston Scientific), 55 Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (AGA Medical), and 3 Amulet (Abbott). Total follow-up 304,8 patientyears, mean follow-up duration 2,98±1,72 y.
Results. During the period, 1 (0,98%) case of acute stroke was registered and 1 case of transient cerebral ischemia. Control transesophageal assessment was done in 100 patients, in 4 (4%) cases there was transient thrombosis of atrial area of the device with no significant outcomes.
Conclusion. Implantation of the LAA occluder is an alternative for anticoagulation in AF patients with high thromboembolic and not possible drug prevention.
About the Authors
К. V. DavtyanRussian Federation
Moscow
A. A. Kalemberg
Russian Federation
Moscow
G. Yu. Simonian
Russian Federation
Moscow
A. G. Topchian
Russian Federation
Moscow
S. N. Koretskiy
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Hart RG, Pearce LA, Aguilar MI. Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:857-67. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-146-12-200706190-00007.
2. Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ, et al. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:981-92. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1107039.
3. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1139-51. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0905561.
4. Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:883-91. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1009638.
5. Giugliano RP, Ruff CT, Braunwald E, et al. Edoxaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:2093-104. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1310907.
6. Ruff CT, Giugliano RP, Braunwald E, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2014;383:955-62. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62343-0.
7. Redfors B, Gray WA, Lee RJ, et al. Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Who Are Not on Anticoagulant Treatment Due to IncreasedBleeding Risk Are Common and Have a High Risk of Stroke, JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology. 2017;3,12:1369-76. doi:10.1016/j.jacep.2017.04.024.
8. Sievert H, Lesh MD, Trepels T, et al. Percutaneous left atrial appendage transcatheter occlusion to prevent stroke in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation: early clinical experience. Circulation. 2002;105(16):1887-9. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000015698.54752.6D.
9. Reddy VY, Doshi ShK, Kar S, et al. 5-Year Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: From the PREVAIL and PROTECT AF Trials, Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2017;70,24:2964-75. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.021.
10. Camm AJ, Lip GYH, De Caterina R, et al. ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG) 2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2719-47. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs253.
11. Post-Approval U. S. Experience With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jan;24;69(3):253-61. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.010.
12. Reddy VY, Akehurst RL, Amorosi SL, et al. Cost-Effectiveness of Left Atrial Appendage Closure With the WATCHMAN Device Compared With Warfarin or Non–Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants for Secondary Prevention in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation. Stroke. 2018;49:1464-70, originally published May 8, 2018. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018825.
13. Prevention and Management of Complications of Left Atrial Appendage Closure Devices Price, Matthew J. Interventional Cardiology Clinics. 2013;3,2:301-11. doi:10.1016/j. iccl.2013.12.001.
14. Laurent F, Cinaud A, Brigadeau F, et al. Device-Related Thrombosis After Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion for Atrial Fibrillation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2018;71,14:1528-36. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.01.076.
15. Dukkipati SR, Kar S, Holmes DR, et al. Device-Related Thrombus After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes Reddy Circulation. 2018;CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035090, originally published May 11, 2018. doi:10.1161/ CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035090.
Review
For citations:
Davtyan К.V., Kalemberg A.A., Simonian G.Yu., Topchian A.G., Koretskiy S.N. EFFICACY OF ISCHEMIC STROKE PREVENTION IN PATIENTS WITH IMPLANTED OCCLUDER OF THE LEFT ATRIUM. FIVE YEAR FOLLOW-UP. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2018;(7):16-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2018-7-16-20