Preview

Russian Journal of Cardiology

Advanced search

Therapeutic equivalence of two amlodipine preparations (original and generic) in patients with arterial hypertension. Results of a double-blind, randomized cross-over study

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess in a double-blind, cross-over randomized trial the therapeutic equivalence of two amplodipine preparations (Cardilopin® and Norvasc®) in patients with arterial hypertension (AH). Thirty individuals with mild to moderate AH (mean age 61,2+1,7) were examined. All participants were treated with Cardilopin® and Norvasc® in six-week courses; the course consequence was randomized. The initial daily dose of amlodipine was 5 mg, in non-responders it was increased to 10 mg 2 weeks later. Treatment efficacy was assessed by rest blood pressure (BP) dynamics. Patients started the treatment with Norvasc® or Cardilopin® did not differ by main clinical characteristics. During Cardilopin treatment, systolic BP (SBP) lowered from 155,7+2,1 mm Hg to 138,8 ±1,5 mm Hg (p<0,001), diastolic BP (DBP) decreased from 95,4±l,2 mm Hg to 87,l±l,5mm Hg(p<0,001). Heart rate (HR) slightly increased -from 74,1±1,7 beats per minute (bpm) to 77,8±2,2 (non-significant). During Norvasc® treatment, SBP lowered from 156,3+2,1 mm Hg to 135,3 ±2,0 mm Hg (p<0,001), and DBP-from 95,2+1,5 mm Hgto 84,6+1,0 mm Hg (p<0,001). HR increased from 74,0+1,6 79,1+1,7 bpm (p<0,05). Authors conclude that Cardilopin® is equal to the «gold standard» amlodipine preparation, Norvasc®, by main clinical characteristics, and both medications are therapeutically equivalent to each other.

About the Authors

S. Yu. Martsevich
Государственный научно-исследовательский центр профилактической медицины МЗ и СР России
Russian Federation


N. P. Kutishenko
Государственный научно-исследовательский центр профилактической медицины МЗ и СР России
Russian Federation


A. D. Deev
Государственный научно-исследовательский центр профилактической медицины МЗ и СР России
Russian Federation


E. V. Alimova
Государственный научно-исследовательский центр профилактической медицины МЗ и СР России
Russian Federation


Yu. E. Semenova
Государственный научно-исследовательский центр профилактической медицины МЗ и СР России
Russian Federation


References

1. Guidelines Committee. 2003 European Society of Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension//J. Hypertens. 2003; 21: 1011-1053.

2. Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration. Effects of ACE-inhibitors, calcium antagonists, and other blood-pressurelowering drugs: results of prospectively designed overviews of randomized trials//Lancet 200; 355: 1955-1964.

3. Opie L., Schall R. Evidence-based evaluations of calcium channel blockers for hypertension//J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2002; 39: 315-322.

4. Staesssen J., Ji-Guang Wang, Thijs L. Calcium-channel blockade and cardiovascular prognosis: recent evidence from clinical outcome trials//Am. J. Hypertens. 2002; 15: 85S-93S.

5. Anapharm Statistical Report № 99056.

6. Emeriau J-P., Knauf H, Pujadas J.O. et al. A comparision of indapamide SR 1.5 mg with both amlodipine 5 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg in elderly hypertensive patients: a randomized double-blind controlled study//J. Hypertens. 2001; 19: 343-350.

7. Lacourciere Y., Poirier L., Provencher P. Comparison of amlodipine and captopril in hypertension based on 24-hour ambulatory monitoring//J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol., 1993; 22(suppl): 20-23.

8. Ibrahim M.M., el-Boghdadly B., Zaghloul S.S. Hemodynamic and 24-h blood pressure profile of amlodipine monotherapy//J. Hum. Hypertens. 1996; 10(7): 489-494.

9. Frick M.N., McGibney D., Tyler H.M., et al. A dose-response study of amlodipine in mild to moderate hypertension//J. Intern. Med. 1989;225:101-105.


Review

For citations:


Martsevich S.Yu., Kutishenko N.P., Deev A.D., Alimova E.V., Semenova Yu.E. Therapeutic equivalence of two amlodipine preparations (original and generic) in patients with arterial hypertension. Results of a double-blind, randomized cross-over study. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2004;(4):53-57. (In Russ.)

Views: 490


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1560-4071 (Print)
ISSN 2618-7620 (Online)