ALTERNATIVE METHOD OF VISCERAL OBESITY ASSESSMENT IN THE DIAGNOSTICS OF METABOLIC SYNDROME
https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2014-3-82-86
Abstract
At present, the existing main and additional criteria of metabolic syndrome (MS) lack a clear justification, which warrants further research.
Aim. To assess the potential of waist circumference (WC) and epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) thickness as alternative main criteria of MS.
Material and methods. In order to compare the specific features of MS diagnosed by different criteria of visceral obesity (WC and EAT thickness), 186 male patients with general obesity were divided into two groups: MS by the EAT thickness-based criteria and MS diagnosed by the WC-based criteria. In all participants, main and additional metabolic risk factors were assessed. Systolic EAT thickness (mm) was measured at the B-mode echocardiography, in the parasternal long-axis view, behind the free right ventricular wall.
Results. In patients with MS by the EAT thickness-based criteria (EAT thickness >7 mm), the levels of insulin (11,2 pIU/ml; 95% confidence interval (CI) 5,219,9 MIU/ml), HOMA-IR index (2,6; 95% CI 1,1-4,6), resistin (12,8 ng/ml; 95% CI 8,1-16,7 ng/ml), and interleukin-6 (12,4 pg/ml; 95% CI 7,6-15,0 pg/ml) were higher than those levels in patients with MS by the WC-based criteria (WC >94 cm):
6,9 (3,5-14,2) MIU/ml (p=0,040); 1,8 (0,9-3,4) (p=0,041); 10,8 (6,6-16,1) ng/ml (p=0,044); and 9,8 (4,8-13,6) pg/ml (p=0,044), respectively. Conclusion. Our results have demonstrated that the EAT thickness >7 mm is a more accurate non-invasive marker of insulin resistance and visceral obesity-related neurohumoral and proinflammatory disturbances, compared to the traditional WC criterion (>94 cm in men). In our opinion, the EAT thickness >7 mm could be used as a clarifying criterion of visceral obesity in MS.
About the Authors
N. G. VeselovskayaRussian Federation
G. A. Chumakova
Russian Federation
A. V. Ott
Russian Federation
O. V. Gritsenko
Russian Federation
N. N. Shenkova
Russian Federation
References
1. Gami AS, Witt BJ, Howard OE, et al. Metabolic syndrome and risk of incident cardiovascular events and death. A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 403-14.
2. Mamedov M, Suslonova N, Lisenkova I. Metabolic syndrome prevalence in Russia: Prelimonary results of a cross — sectional population study. Diab Vasc Dis res 2007; 4: 46-7.
3. Hoffmann R, Stellbrink E, Schroder J, et al. Impact of the metabolic syndrome on angiographic and clinical events after coronary intervention using bare-metal or sirolimus- eluting stents. Am J Cardiol 2007; 100 (9):1347-52.
4. Canibus P, Faloia E, Piva T, et al. Metabolic syndrome does not increase angiographic restenosis rates after drug-eluting stent implantation. Metabolism 2008; 57 (5): 593-7.
5. National clinical guidelines "Diagnostics and treatment of a metabolic syndrome" (second revision). Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. Supplement 2. 2009; 8 (5): 4-6. Russian (Национальные клинические рекомендации "Диагностика и лечение метаболического синдрома" (второй пересмотр). Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профи¬лактика. Приложение 2. 2009; 8 (6): 4-6).
6. Grundy SM, Brewer HB, Cleeman JI. Definition of Metabolic Syndrome. Oirculation 2004;109: 433-438.
7. Montani JP, Carroll JF, Dwyer TM, et al. Ectopic fat storage in heart, blood vessels and kidneys in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2004; 28:58-65.
8. Iacobellis G, Willens HJ, Barbaro G. ^reslio^ values of high-risk echocardiography epicardial fat thickness. Obesity 2008;16 (4): 887-892.
9. Veselovskaya NG, Chumakova GA, Ott AV, et al. Noninvasive marker of an insulin resistance at patients with obesity. Russ J Cardiol 2013;6:28-32. Russian (Веселовская Н. Г., Чумакова Г. А., Отт А. В. и др. Неинвазивный маркер инсулинорезистентности у пациентов с ожирением. Российский кардиологический журнал 2013;6:28-32).
10. Iacobellis G, Ribaudo MC, Assael F, et al. Echocardiography epicardial adipose tissue is related to anthropometric and clinical parameters of metabolic syndrome: a new indicator of cardiovascular risk. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003; 88: 5163-8.
11. Pierdomenico SD, Pierdomenico AM. Epicardial Adipose Tissue and Metabolic Syndrome in Hypertensive Patients With Normal Body Weight and Waist Circumference. Am J Hypertens 2011; 24:1245-9.
12. Iacobellis G, Barbaro G. The double role of epicardial adipose tissue as pro- and anti¬inflammatory organ. Horm Metab Res 2008; 40 (7):442-5.
13. Iacobellis G, Sharma AM. Adiposity of the heart. Ann Intern Med 2006; 145:554-5.
14. Iacobellis G, Pistilli D, Gucciardo M, et al. Adiponectin expression in human epicardial adipose tissue in vivo is lower in patients with coronary artery disease. Cytokine 2005; 29 (6): 251-5.
15. Ormseth MJ, Lipson A, Alexopoulos N, et al. Epicardial adipose tissue is associated with cardiometabolic risk and the metabolic syndrome in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2013; 65 (9): 1410-5.
Review
For citations:
Veselovskaya N.G., Chumakova G.A., Ott A.V., Gritsenko O.V., Shenkova N.N. ALTERNATIVE METHOD OF VISCERAL OBESITY ASSESSMENT IN THE DIAGNOSTICS OF METABOLIC SYNDROME. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2014;(3):82-86. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2014-3-82-86