European National Society Cardiovascular Journals. Background, Rationale and Mission Statement of the “Editors Club”

1. Goodman N., Bijnens B., Van de Werf F. The European Heart Journal: a European journal with a global impact in cardiovascular medicine. Eur. Heart J. 2004; 25: 1382-4.

2. Piper H.M., Martinson E.A., Opthof T. The hills and valleys of an impact factor. Cardiovasc. Res. 2005; 67: 175.

3. Piper H.M., Garcia-Dorado D., Martinson E.A. Readers' choice: hot papers downloaded in 2006. Cardiovasc. Res. 2007; 73: 619-22.

4. European Society of Cardiology (ESC). (<http://www.escardio.org>)

5. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. N Engl. J. Med. 1997; 23; 336:309-15. (<http://www.ICMJE.org>)

6. Scott-Lichter D., and the Editorial Policy Committee, Council of Scientific Editors. CSErs White paper on promoting integrity in scientific journal publications. Reston, VA:CSE;2006 (<http://www>. councilscienceeditors.org/editorial-policies/white-paper.cfm <http://councilscienceeditors.org/editorial-policies/white-paper.cfm>.)

7. World Association of Medical Editors (WAME) (<http://www>. WAME.org)

8. Alfonso F., Bermejo J., Segovia J. New recommendations of the international committee of medical journal editors. Shifting focus: from uniformity in technical requirements to bioethical considerations. Rev. Esp. Cardiol. 2004; 57: 592-3.

9. Moher D., Schulz K., Altaian D.G., for the CONSORT group. The revised CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials. Lancet 2001; 357: 1191-4.

10. Garcra-Dorado D., Schlьter K.D., Martinson E.A., Piper H.M. Which papers are more interesting to the readers of Cardiovascular Research? Information from download monitoring. Cardiovasc. Research. 2005; 65: 1-5.

11. Relman A.S. The Ingelfinger rule. N. Engl. J. Med. 1981; 305: 824-6.

12. Hildner F.J. Redundant publication. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Diagn. 1997; 42: 111-2.

13. de Maria A. Duplicate publication: insights into the essence of a medical journal. JACC 2003; 41: 516-7.

14. Relman A.S. Publish or perish -or both. N. Engl. J. Med. 1977: 297: 724-5.

15. Hildner F.J. Ethical issues in cardiovascular publications: Observations during 25 years as an Editor. Catheter. Cardiovascular. Interv. 2003.

16. Alfonso F., Bermejo J., Segovia J. Duplicate or Redundant Publication: Can we Afford it? Rev. Esp. Cardiol. 2005; 58: 601-4.

17. Seglen P.O. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used to evaluate research. BMJ 1997; 314: 497-502.

18. Smith R. Unscientific practice flourishes in science. Impact factors of journals should not be used to evaluate research. BMJ 1998; 316: 1036-40.

19. Alfonso F., Bermejo J., Segovia J. Impactology, Impactitis, Impactotherapy. Rev. Esp. Cardiol. 2005; 58: 1239-45.

20. de Angelis C., Drazen J.M., Frizelle F.A., et al. Clinical trial registration: a statment from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004; 351: 1250-1.

21. Alfonso F., Segovia J., Heras M., Bermejo J. Publication of Clinical Trials in Scientific Journals: Editorial Issues. Rev. Esp. Cardiol. 2006; 59: 1206-14.

22. Bassand J.P., Ryden L. Guidelines: making the headlines or confined to the slide lines? Eur. Heart J. 1999; 20: 1149-51.

23. Alfonso F., Bermejo J., Segovia J. European Guidelines at Revista Espacola de Cardiologнa: Towards a Full "Globalization" of Cardiovascular Care? Rev. Esp. Cardiol. 2004; 57: 1000-02.

24. Priori S.G., Aliot E., Blomstrom-Lundqvist C., et al. European Society of Cardiology. Task Force on Sudden Cardiac Death, European Society of Cardiology. Summary of recommendations. Ital. Heart J. Suppl. 2002; 3(10): 1051-65.

25. Brady A.J., Poole-Wilson P.A. ESC-CHF: guidelines for the aspirational and the practical. Heart 2006; 92: 437-40.

26. Silber S., Albertsson P., Aviles F.F., et al. European Society of Cardiology. Percutaneous coronary interventions. Guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology-ESC. Kardiol. Pol. 2005; 63: 265-320; discussion 321-3.

27. Seidl K., Schuchert A., Tebbenjohanns J., Hartung W. Commentary on the guidelines the diagnosis and the therapy of syncope the European Society of Cardiology 2001 and the update 2004. Z Kardiol. 2005; 94(9): 592-612.

28. Fox K.A. Registries and surveys in acute coronary syndrome. Eur. Heart J. 2006; 27: 2260-2.

29. Simoons M.L., van der Putten N., Wood D., et al. The Cardiology Information System: the need for data standards for integration of systems for patient care, registries and guidelines for clinical practice. Eur. Heart J. 2002; 23: 1148-52.

30. Bermejo J., Segovia J., Alfonso F. Summary of the clinical studies reported in the scientific session of the American Heart Association 2005 (Dallas, Texas, USA, 13-16 November 2005). Rev. Esp. Cardiol. 2006; 59: 143-53.

31. Goyal A., Tricoci P., Melloni C., et al. Highlights from the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions, November 13 to 16, 2005; Dallas, TX. Am. Heart J. 2006; 151: 295-303.

32. No authors listed. Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal. Circulation.

33. Ribeiro C., Ferreira R. Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia. Quality and prestige for the use of cardiovascular medicine. Rev. Port. Cardiol. 1992; 11: 11-2.