Preview

Russian Journal of Cardiology

Advanced search

SPIRAPRIL EFFECTS ON OFFICE AND AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE LEVELS AND THEIR DIFFERENCE IN PATIENTS WITH ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the effects of an ACE inhibitor spirapril (S) on office and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) levels, quality of life (QoL) and psychological status (PS) in patients with Stage 1–2 arterial hypertension (AH). Material and methods: This open, randomised cross-over study (4 weeks of spirapril therapy, 4 weeks of amlodipine (A) therapy) included 39 patients with Stage 1–2 AH, aged 53,7±10,0 years; mean AH duration was 11,8±9,5 years. After 7-day wash-out period, S (6 mg) or A (5 mg) were administered; if necessary, A dose was increased to 10 mg; S dose was constant. At baseline and in the end of each treatment phase, 24-hour BP monitoring (BPM), personality traits (Multiphasic Personality Inventory) and QoL (General Well-Being Questionnaire by Marburg University) assessment were performed. No only average levels of office and ambulatory BP, but also the masked hypertension effect (MHE), as an equivalent of masked AH treatment ineffectiveness (MTI), were assessed. MHE was evaluated based on the difference between daytime ambulatory and office BP levels. Results: Both medications were effective in achieving target levels of office and ambulatory AH. MHT value was +1,3±2,0/+0,3±1,3 and +3,6±2,0/+0,3±1,3 mm Hg for S and A treatment, respectively (р<0,05), with initial value of -4,1±1,8/-3,5±1,2 mm Hg. Both medications did not affect QoL and improved some PS parameters. MTI predictors included increased body mass index and electrocardiographic signs of left ventricular hypertrophy (p<0,01– 0,05). MTI risk was lower in older patients, those receiving antihypertensive therapy, consuming moderate doses of alcohol, or having high S7 score (psychasthenia) by MMPI scale (р<0,05). Conclusion: The difference between office and ambulatory BP levels could be explained by various factors. Optimal antihypertensive effect includes achieving target levels for both ambulatory and office BP. Spirapril is an effective antihypertensive medication, facilitating target BP level achievement and PS improvement in AH patients.

About the Authors

V. M. Gorbunov
ФГУ “Государственный научно-исследовательский центр профилактической медицины Росмедтехнологии”, Москва
Russian Federation


M. I. Smirnova
ФГУ “Государственный научно-исследовательский центр профилактической медицины Росмедтехнологии”, Москва
Russian Federation


G. F. Andreeva
ФГУ “Государственный научно-исследовательский центр профилактической медицины Росмедтехнологии”, Москва
Russian Federation


A. D. Deev
ФГУ “Государственный научно-исследовательский центр профилактической медицины Росмедтехнологии”, Москва
Russian Federation


References

1. Горбунов В.М. Использование СМАД для оценки эффективности антигипертензивной терапии. Н.Новгород, 2006, 47 с.

2. Fagard R.H., Cornelissen A. Incidence of cardiovascular events in white-coat, masked and sustained hypertension versus true normotension: a meta-analysis // J Hypertens 2007;25:2193–2198.

3. 2007 Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension // J Hypertens 2007;25:1105–1087.

4. Pickering T.G., Eguchi K., Kario K. «Masked» hypertension: a review // Hypertens Res 2007; 6: 479–488.

5. Леонова М.В., Демидова М.А., Тарасов А.В. и др. Опыт применения спираприла и его эффекты у больных с артериальной гипертонией // Российский кардиологический журнал 2006; 1(57):40–43.

6. Горбунов В.М., Смирнова М.И., Андреева Г.Ф. и др. Влияние ингибитора ангиотензин-превращающего фермента спираприла на показатели суточного профиля артериального давления, качества жизни и психологического статуса больных артериальной гипертонией I-II степеней // Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика. 2008; 6:10–15.

7. Verberk W.J., Kessels A.G.H., de Leeuw P.W. Prevalence, causes and consequences of masked hypertension: a meta-analysis // Am. J. Hypertens. 2008; 21:969–975.

8. D.Pewsner, M.Egger, M.Battaglia et al. Accuracy of electrocardiography in diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in arterial hypertension: systematic review // BMJ. 2007 October 6; 335(7622):711.

9. Орлов В.Н. Руководство по электрокардиографии. Москва: “Медицина”. 1983, 526 c.

10. де Луна А. Б. Руководство по клинической ЭКГ. Москва: «Медицина». 1993, 704 c., 195–211.

11. Metelitsa V.I.,. Douda S.G., Ostrovskaya T.P. et al. Long-term monotherapy with antihypertensives and quality of life in patients with mild to moderate arterial hypertension: a multicentre study // J. Drug. Dev. Clin. Pract. 1996; 8(2):61–76.

12. 2007 Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension// J. Hypertens. 2007;25:1105–1087.

13. SAS User`s Guide: Statistics Version 5 Edition. Cary NC: SAS Institute Inc. – 1985. – 956pp.

14. Pickering T.G., Coats A., Mallion J.M. et al. Task force V: Whitecoat hypertension. Blood Press Monit 1999; 4: 333–431.

15. Verberk W.J., Thien T., Kroon A.A. et al. Prevalence and persistence of masked hypertension in treated hypertensive patients. Am. J. Hypertens. 2007;20 (12):1266–1267.

16. Mancia G., Facchetti R., Bombelli M. et al. Long-term risk of mortality associated with selective and combined elevation in office, home and ambulatory blood pressure. Hypertension 2006;47:846– 853.


Review

For citations:


Gorbunov V.M., Smirnova M.I., Andreeva G.F., Deev A.D. SPIRAPRIL EFFECTS ON OFFICE AND AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE LEVELS AND THEIR DIFFERENCE IN PATIENTS WITH ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2009;(1):57-61. (In Russ.)

Views: 386


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1560-4071 (Print)
ISSN 2618-7620 (Online)