RELIABILITY AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY OF THE RUSSIAN VERSION OF EUROPEAN SELF-CARE BEHAVIOUR SCALE IN CHRONIC HEART FAILURE
https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2016-8-14-19
Abstract
Aim. To assess reliability and discriminant validity of the Russian version of European Scale of Self-care in patients with heart failure (HF).
Material and methods. European Scale of self-help assessment in CHF was translated in Russian according to Brislin model by three not related translators. After discussion by the workgroup members, professional translator retranslated back it to English, and the result was agreed with the author of the score. Then, 95 patients were included with chronic HF (CHF) of various etiology, who responded the questions at admittance and discharge from cardiological departments. Cronbach alpha was used for analysis of intrinsic consistency of the score. Also discriminant validity was evaluated.
Results. Edication of CHF patients led to decrease of the whole points summ from 27,7±6,6 at admittance to 15,8±4,5 by discharge event. Coefficient of intrinsic consistency Cronbach alpha of the Russian version of European Scale was 0,826. Absence of significant relation of total points summ from Kansas questionnaire for cardiomyopathy patients and Minnessota questionnaire of life quality in HF proved discriminant validity of the Russian version.
Conclusion. Russian version of European Scale of Self-help for patients with HF is easy to use and convenient instrument, which might be helpful for clinical trials as for clinical practice.
About the Authors
Yu. M. Lopatin
Volgograd State Medical University;
Volgograd Regional Clinical Cardiological Center
Russian Federation
Volgograd
Russian Federation
Volgograd
A. A. Grebennikova
Volgograd State Medical University;
Volgograd Regional Clinical Cardiological Center
Russian Federation
Volgograd
Russian Federation
Volgograd
Yu. L. Begrambekova
Medical Scientific-Educational Canter of MSU n.a. M.V. Lomonosov
Russian Federation
Moscow
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Mareev VYu, Ageev FT, Arutyunov GP, et al. National guidelines OSSN, RCS and RNMOT for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure (fourth revision). Journal Heart failure 2013; 14: 1-91. Russian (Мареев В.Ю., Агеев Ф.Т., Арутюнов Г.П. и соавт. Национальные рекомендации ОССН, РКО и РНМОТ по диагностике и лечению ХСН (четвертый пересмотр). Журнал Сердечная недостаточность 2013; 14: 1-91).
2. Ross JS, Chen J, Lin Z, et al. Recent national trends in readmission rates after heart failure hospitalization. Circ. Heart Fail. 2010; 3: 97-103.
3. Krumholz HM. Post-hospital Syndrome — An acquired, Transient Condition of Generalized Risk. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013; 368: 2.
4. Marti NC, Fonarow GC, Gheorghiade M, et al. Timing and duration of interventions in clinical trials for patients with hospitalized heart failure. Circ. Heart Fail. 2013; 6: 1095-101.
5. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC, Eur J Heart Fail. 2016 May 20. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.592.
6. McAlister FA, Stewart S, Ferrua S, et al. Multidisciplinary strategies for the management of heart failure patients at high risk for admission: a systematic review of randomized trials. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2004; 44: 810-9.
7. Feltner C, Jones CD, Cené CW, et al. Transitional care interventions to prevent readmissions for persons with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Intern. Med. 2014; 160: 774-84.
8. Jaarsma T, Strömberg A, Mårtesson J, et al. Development and testing of the European Heart Failure Self-Care Behavior Scale. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2003; 5: 363-70.
9. Green CP, Porter CB, Bresnahan DR, et al. Development and evaluation of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire: a new health status measure for heart failure. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2000; 35: 1245-55.
10. Rector TS, Francis GS, Cohn JN. Patient’s self-assessment of their congestive heart failure. Part 1: patient perceived dysfunction and its poor correlation with maximal exercise tests. Heart Fail. 1987; 10: 192-6.
11. Mareev VYu, Begrambekova YuL, Danielyan MO, et al. What questions are asked and what questions can answer research on medical treatment of patients with heart failure. The research lessons the CHANCE Journal Heart failure 2014; 15: 301-12. Russian (Мареев В.Ю., Беграмбекова Ю.Л., Даниелян М.О. и соавт. Какие вопросы задаются и на какие вопросы способны ответить исследования по медикаментозному лечению пациентов с сердечной недостаточностью. Уроки исследования ШАНС. Журнал Сердечная Недостаточность. 2014; 15: 301-12).
12. Jaarsma T, Stromberg A, Martensson J, et al. The European Heart Failure Self-Care Behavior Scale revised into nine-item scale. A reliable and valid instrument. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2009; 11: 99-105.
13. Lambrinou E, Kalogirou F, Lamnisos D, et al. The Greek version of the 9-item European heart failure self-care behaviour scale: A multidimensional or a uni-dimensional scale? Heart & Lung 2014; 43: 494-9.
Review
For citations:
Lopatin Yu.M., Grebennikova A.A., Begrambekova Yu.L. RELIABILITY AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY OF THE RUSSIAN VERSION OF EUROPEAN SELF-CARE BEHAVIOUR SCALE IN CHRONIC HEART FAILURE. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2016;(8):14-19. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2016-8-14-19
Views:
1068
Email this article 