Preview

Russian Journal of Cardiology

Advanced search

MULTISLICE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY IN PATIENTS WITH ANGINA PECTORIS

https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2016-4-eng-165-168

Abstract

Aim. Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) is a non-invasive method for the heart and coronary arteries imaging. The aim of the research was to establish the diagnostic exactness of MSCT in the revelation of significant coronary artery disease in patients with angina pectoris, using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) of coronary arteries as the gold standard.

Material and methods. In 78 (56 men, 22 women; average age 64,3±11 years), patients with clinical signs of angina pectoris were done examination of the coronary arteries on 64-slice MSCT in order to detect significant stenoses (>50% luminal narrowing). MSCT of coronary arteries was compared with the invasive coronary angiography.

Results. In 78 patients, 864 segments of coronary arteries were available for evaluation. In all segments of coronary arteries, invasive coronary angiography identified 51 lesions. Forty-five lesions were detected by MSCT. The matching sensitivity and specificity were 88% and 97%. Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values in a patient-per-patient analysis were 93%, 93%, 90%, and 96%, respectively.

False-negative results — Seventeen segments of coronary arteries with diameter reduction in range 51% to 75% were missed on the MSCT scan. The major of the missed lesions were located in the left anterior descedenting artery and the left circumflex artery (small side branches). Four segments were missed because of severe calcifications and five because of motion artifacts. False-positive results — Thirty nine segments were incorrectly classified as significantly because of overestimation.

Conclusion. MSCT coronary angiography is an effective, fast, reliable and noninvasive method for the analysis of the coronary arteries. The best results were obtained in patients with healthy coronary arteries (high percentage of negative predictive value), which can significantly reduce the number of invasive coronary angiography. With the improvement of technical characteristics, CT is gaining more importance in the analysis of coronary stenoses and analysis of atherosclerotic plaque.

About the Authors

D. Ilić
Clinical Center Nis

Department of Radiology,

Bulevar Zorana Djindjica 48, Nis



S. Jankovic
Clinical Center Nis
Nis


References

1. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Shaw LJ, et al. Meta-analysis of comparative diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and multi-slice computed tomography for non-invasive coronary angiography. Am Heart J 2006;151:404–11.

2. Scanlon P, Faxon D, Audet A, et al. Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;331756-1824.

3. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the ad hoc committee for grading of coronary artery disease, council of cardiovascular surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1975;51:5–40.

4. Martucelli E, Romagnoli A, D’Eliseo A, et al. Accuracy of thin-slice computed tomography in the detection of coronary stenoses. Eur Heart J. 2004;25:1043–8.

5. Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thinslice multi detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation. 2003;107:664–6.

6. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA, et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 2005;112:2318–23.

7. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:552–7.

8. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 2005;26:1482–7.

9. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Nieman K, et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:2265-70.

10. Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Schmitz BL, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography. Jama 2005; 293:2471-8.

11. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Pohle FK, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses using multidetector CT with 16 x 0.75 collimation and 375 ms rotation. Eur Heart J 2005;26:1978-86.

12. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Krestin GP, et al. Improved diagnostic accuracy with 16-row multislice computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:128-32.

13. Garcia MJ, Lessick J, Hoffmann MH. Accuracy of 16-row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis. Jama 2006;296:403-11.

14. Dewey M, Teige F, Schnapauff D, et al. Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenoses with multislice computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Intern Med 2006;145:407-15.

15. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, et al. Non-invasive coronary computed tomographic angiography for patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the Coronary Angiography by Computed Tomography with the Use of a Submillimeter resolution (CACTUS) trial. Eur Heart J 2007.

16. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 2005;26:1482-7.

17. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:552-7.

18. Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F, et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:147-54.

19. Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Runza G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64- slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol 2006;16:575-82.

20. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA, et al. Highresolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 2005;112:2318-23.

21. Ropers D, Rixe J, Anders K, et al. Usefulness of multidetector row spiral computed tomography with 64- x 0.6- mm collimation and 330-ms rotation for the noninvasive detection of significant coronary artery stenoses. Am J Cardiol 2006;97:343-8.

22. Nikolaou K, Knez A, Rist C, et al. Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:111-7.

23. Nikolaou K, Saam T, Rist C, et al. Pre- and postsurgical diagnostics with dual-source computed tomography in cardiac surgery. Radiologe 2007;47:310-8.

24. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A, et al. Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: First experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control. Eur Radiol 2006;16:2739-47.

25. Weustink AC, Meijboom WB, Mollet NR, et al. Reliable high-speed coronary computed tomography in symptomatic patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:786-94.

26. Achenbach S, Ropers U, Kuettner A, et al. Randomized comparison of 64-slice single- and dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2008; 1: 177–86.

27. Alkadhi H, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L, et al. Dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography: influence of obesity, calcium load, and heart rate on diagnostic accuracy. Eur Heart J, 2008; 29: 766–76

28. Chen HW, Fang XM, Hu XY, et al. Efficacy of dual-source CT coronary angiography in evaluating coronary stenosis: initial experience. Clin Imaging, 2010; 34: 165–17.


Review

For citations:


Ilić D., Jankovic S. MULTISLICE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY IN PATIENTS WITH ANGINA PECTORIS. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2016;(4-eng):165-168. https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2016-4-eng-165-168

Views: 15037


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1560-4071 (Print)
ISSN 2618-7620 (Online)