MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOMES IN ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN “NON-INVASIVE” CLINIC
https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2017-1-89-94
Abstract
Aim. To evaluate the management and outcomes in acute coronary syndrome patients (ACS) comorbid with atrial fibrillation (AF) during in-patient period and in 12 months from ACS onset.
Material and methods. Into multicenter prospective registry (CCH № 29 of Moscow), beginning December 2013, during 12 months, all consecutive patients included, with ACS, and AF on baseline ECG. Follow-up was continued during hospitalization and in 12 months from ACS (phone call).
Results. Totally, 234 patients included. Mean age 72,0±11,6 y.o., 65+73,5%, females — 68,8%, anamnesis of myocardial infarction (MI) — 35,9%, diabetes — 23,9%, known AF before ACS — 65,0%, non-ST-elevation ACS — 97,9%, Killip >I — 7,3%, ST depression on baseline ECG — 89,9%, high troponin level — 59,0%, GRACE risk of fatal outcome >140 points. — 75,2%, median CHA2 DS2 -Vasc — 5 pts. At discharge from hospital, 44% patients received double antiplatelet treatment (DAT), 38% — aspirin with oral anticoagulant (OAC), 33% — warfarin, 23% — new OAC (NOAC). During hospitalization (median 14 days) 7 patients died (3,0%). In 12 months the outcomes were followed in 210 patients (89,8%). By 12 months from ACS onset, 18,1% patients died, and in 12 months but after discharge — 15,3%. New MI after discharge had 1,5%, stroke — 2,5%, and bleeding — 3,5% patients. The part of fatal outcomes in 12 months did not differ in DAT or aspirin with OAC groups (12,1% vs 12,8%; p=0,88). The “remained” prescription rate (i.e. adherence) in 12 months after ACS was maximum for aspirin, OAC and NOAC (71%, 58%, 63%, resp.) and minimum for DAT and aspirin with OAC (20% and 27%, resp.). The independent predictors of death after discharge from hospital up to 12 months from ACS onset were the baseline hemoglobin <110 g/L (OR 16,00; 95% CI 2,57-99,50; р=0,003), non-treatment by antithrombotics before ACS (OR 7,22; 95% CI 2,20- 23,68; р=0,001), hospital risk by GRACE >140 pts. (OR 6,88; 95% CI 1,44-32,80; р=0,015) and non-prescription of aspirin in discharge (OR 3,21; 95% CI 1,20-8,61; р=0,02).
Conclusion. The results of observational study of ACS and AF patients, admitted to Moscow city “non-invasive” clinic, showed high rate of fatal outcomes in 12 months after ACS (18,1%), low adherence to the prescribed treatment after discharge. Also, in the group studied, there were predictors of fatal outcomes in 12 months after ACS.
About the Authors
A. D. ErlikhRussian Federation
Moscow
K. G. Tkachenko
Moscow
N. A. Gratsiansky
Moscow
References
1. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). European Heart Journal Advance Access published August 29, 2015. European Heart Journal. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv320.
2. McManus DD, Huang W, Domakonda KV, et al. Trends in atrial fibrillation in patients hospitalized with an acute coronary syndrome. Am J Med 2012 Nov; 125(11): 1076-84.
3. Angeli F, Reboldi G, Garofoli M, et al. Atrial fibrillation and mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction: systematic overview and meta-analysis. Curr Cardiol Rep 2012 Oct; 14(5): 601-10.
4. Erlikh AD. A scale for early assessment of risk of death and death or myocardial infarction during initial hospitalization of patients with acute coronary syndromes (based on data from the RECORD registry). Kardiologiia 2010; 10:11-1. Russian (Эрлих А.Д. Шкала для ранней оценки риска смерти и развития инфаркта миокарда в период пребывания в стационаре больных с острыми коронарными синдромами (на основе данных регистра РЕКОРД). Кардиология 2010; 10: 11-16).
Review
For citations:
Erlikh A.D., Tkachenko K.G., Gratsiansky N.A. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOMES IN ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN “NON-INVASIVE” CLINIC. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2017;(1):89-94. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2017-1-89-94