ASSESSMENT OF THE PERIOPERATION RISK WITH VerifyNow ARU® TOOL IN PATIENTS AFTER CORONARY BYPASS ON PROLONGED ASPIRIN TREATMENT
https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2016-1-60-67
Abstract
Aim. During perioperation time of coronary bypass grafting (CBG) to evaluate diagnostical significance of platelet functional activity by the system VerifyNow ARU® in assessment of high hemorrhagic and ischemia risk patients on prolonged aspirin treatment.
Material and methods. Totally, 32 patients included, that were preparing for planned primary operation of CBG. In perioperation time all patients were taking acetylsalicylic acid 75-100 mg/day. Platelet function was assessed in 3 days before surgical intervention with VerifyNow ARU® (Accumetrics, USA).
Results. Depending on the ARU level, all patients were selected into two groups. First group (1), consisted of 11 patients, included those with the highest antiplatelet effect of aspirin, the second (2) included all the rest. Mean value of VerifyNow among all selection, in groups 1 and 2 was, respectively, 505,9±87,3, 425,2±21,7 and
548,2±78,2 ARU. Comparison groups were comparable in clinical and anamnestic properties. By the values of intraoperation blood loss (509,1±30,2 mL in the 1st group versus 515,8±50,1 mL in the second, p=0,30) and postoperation blood loss (drainage flow during 6 hours was 115,9±42,2 mL in the 1st group vs. 111,8±38,5 mL in the 2nd, p=0,87; during 12 hours 188,6±83,9 mL in 1st vs. 187,4±93,0 mL, resp., p=0,89; during 24 hours — 218,2±110,2 mL vs. 253,6±142,6 mL, resp., p=0,70) comparison groups did not differ. In correlation assessment there was tendency found of the platelets reactivity level with 6-hour blood loss (p=0,09). This data was confirmed by the results of linear regression analysis, that showed negative correlation of blood loss volume and VerifyNow results. In five patients (15,6%) postoperation period complicated with coronary flow instability and development of myocardial infarction, confirmed by dynamics of myocardial damage markers. All five patients were in the second and third terciles of VerifyNow, in lower tercile of VerifyNow there were no any perioperational coronary events (p=0,14).
Conclusion. Results of the analysis demonstrate that the assessment of functional activity of platelets by VerifyNow assay can be applied as laboratory criteria for prediction of postoperation blood loss and perioperation ischemia events in CBG operations at the background of prolonged aspirin therapy.
About the Authors
K. E. KrivoshapovaRussian Federation
S. S. Altarev
Russian Federation
O. V. Gruzdeva
Russian Federation
G. P. Plotnikov
Russian Federation
O. L. Barbarash
Russian Federation
References
1. Bokeria LA, Gudkova RG. Cardiovascular Surgery — 2013. Diseases and congenital malformations of the circulatory system. M: Bakoulev CCVS RAMS; 20144 р. 210. Russian (Бокерия Л. А., Гудкова Р. Г. Сердечно-сосудистая хирургия — 2013. Болезни и врожденные аномалии системы кровообращения. М.:НЦССХ им. А. Н. Бакулева РАМН; 20144 с.210).
2. Choong CK, Gerrard C, Goldsmith KA, et al. Delayed re-exploration for bleeding after coronary artery bypass surgery results in adverse outcomes. Eur. J Cardiothorac. Surg. 2007; 31: 834-8.
3. Baigent C, Blackwell L, Collins R, et al. Aspirin in the primary and secondary prevention of ascular disease: collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials. Lancet. 2009; 373: 1849-60.
4. Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association. Circulation. 2007; 116: e148-304.
5. Antman EM, Hand M, Armstrong PW, et al. 2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA 2004 guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association. Circulation. 2008; 117: 296-329.
6. Grove EL, Hossain R, Storey RF. Platelet function testing and prediction of procedural bleeding risk. Thromb. Haemost. 2013; 109: 817-24.
7. Ferraris VA, Saha SP, Oestreich JH, et al. 2012 Update to The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Guideline on Use of Antiplatelet Drugs in Patients Having Cardiac and Noncardiac Operations. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2012; 94: 1761-81.
8. Kolh P, Windecker S, Alfonso F, et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur. J Card-Thorac. Surg. 2014; 46: 517-92.
9. Menkis AH, Martin J, Cheng DCH, et al. Drug, Devices, Technologies, and Techniques for lood Management in Minimally Invasive and Conventional Cardiothoracic Surgery. A Consensus Statement From the International Society for Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery (ISMICS) 2011. Innovations. 2012; 7: 229-41.
10. Nielsen HL, Kristensen SD, Thygesen SS, et al. Aspirin response evaluated by the VerifyNow Aspirin System and light transmission aggregometry. Thromb. Res. 2008; 123(2): 267-73.
11. Mansour K, Taher AT, Musallam KM, et al. Aspirin Resistance. Advances in Hematology. 2009; 1-10.
12. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. European Heart Journal. 2012; 33: 2551-67.
13. Harrison P, Frelinger AL 3rd, Furman MI, et al. Measuring antiplatelet drug effects in the laboratory. Thromb. Res. 2007; 120, 3: 323-36.
14. Chen L, Bracey AW, Radovancevic R, et al. Clopidogrel and bleeding in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2004; 128: 425-31.
15. Dalén M, van der Linden J, Lindvall G, et al. Correlation between point-of-care platelet function testing and bleeding after coronary artery surgery. Scand. Cardiovasc. J. 2012; 46(1): 32-8.
16. Brizzio ME, Mak AWC, Shaw RE, et al. Use of an Objective Tool to Assess Platelet Inhibition Prior to Off-Pump Coronary Surgery to Reduce Blood Usage. J Invasive Cardiol. 2012; 24: 49-52.
17. Wasowicz M, McCluskey SA, Wijeysundera DN, et al. The incremental value of thrombelastography for prediction of excessive blood loss after cardiac surgery: an observational study. Anesth. Analg. 2010; 111: 331-8.
18. Mahla E, Suarez TA, Bliden KP, et al. Platelet Function Measurement-Based Strategy to Reduce Bleeding and Waiting Time in Clopidogrel-Treated Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. The Timing Based on Platelet Function Strategy to Reduce Clopidogrel-Associated Bleeding Related to CABG (TARGET-CABG) Study. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2012; 5: 261-9.
19. Reed GW, Kumar A, Guo J, et al. Point-of-Care Platelet Function Testing Predicts Bleeding in Patients Exposed to Clopidogrel Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Verify Pre-Op TIMI 45 — A Pilot Study. Clin. Cardiol. 2015. doi: 10.1002/clc.22357. [Epub ahead of print].
20. Campo G, P arrinello G, Ferraresi P, et al. Prospective evaluation of on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity over time in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention relationship with gene polymorphisms and clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 21;57(25): 2474-83.
Review
For citations:
Krivoshapova K.E., Altarev S.S., Gruzdeva O.V., Plotnikov G.P., Barbarash O.L. ASSESSMENT OF THE PERIOPERATION RISK WITH VerifyNow ARU® TOOL IN PATIENTS AFTER CORONARY BYPASS ON PROLONGED ASPIRIN TREATMENT. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2016;(1):60-67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2016-1-60-67