Preview

Russian Journal of Cardiology

Advanced search

Coronary microvascular dysfunction: the importance of markers of sympathetic activity and autonomic imbalance

https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2025-6335

EDN: BXXWUK

Abstract

Aim. To study the relationship between adrenomedullin, catestatin, norepinephrine and heart rate variability (HRV) parameters with coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).

Material and methods. The study included 29 patients (55 (51; 63) years) with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (63 (61; 66)%) and non-obstructive CAD. Serum biomarker levels were assessed at baseline and after 12-month follow-up using enzyme immunoassay. Standard semiquantitative scores of myocardial perfusion impairment and myocardial flow parameters were assessed using dynamic single-photon emission computed tomography. In the absence of obstructive CAD, a decrease in myocardial flow reserve (MFR) ≤2 was regarded as CMD. HRV indices were determined using 24-hour ECG monitoring.

Results. Depending on CMD, patients were divided into 2 following groups: CMD+ (n=14) and CMD- (n=15). According to 24-hour ECG monitoring, patients with CMD showed a decrease in HRV and sympathetic activity. Cathestatin levels significantly correlated with myocardial flow at rest (r=0,329; p=0,019) and HRV parameters as follows: mean duration of all R-R (N-N) intervals of sinus rhythm (mean NN) (r=-0,410; p=0,001), SDANN (r=-0,276; p=0,036) and SDNNidx (r=0,287; p=0,029). Norepinephrine concentrations were interrelated only with CFR (r=-0,295; p=0,037), and adrenomedullin — with mean NN (r=0,272; p=0,038). Biomarker levels did not differ significantly between the groups at baseline and after 12 months. At the same time, norepinephrine levels remained virtually unchanged during prospective follow-up, while catestatin levels in CMD+ patients tended to increase by 11,7% (p=0,632), and in the CMD- group — by 16,1% (p=0,632), and adrenomedullin — by 19,4% (p=0,325) and 23,7% (p=0,527), respectively. Independent factors associated with CMD were sympathetic suppression, expressed as a decrease in square root of the mean squared differences of successive NN intervals (rMSSD) ≤60 ms (odds ratio 1,065; 95% confidence interval 1,005-1,675; p=0,001) and body mass index ≥27,8 kg/m2 (odds ratio 1,061; 95% confidence interval 0,998-1,668; p=0,001).

Conclusion. Norepinephrine, adrenomedullin, and catestatin levels did not differ significantly between patients with and without CMD. However, catestatin concentrations were associated with resting myocardial flow and HRV parameters, while norepinephrine values — with CFR, and adrenomedullin — with mean NN.

About the Authors

K. V. Kopyeva
Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center
Russian Federation

Tomsk


Competing Interests:

None



E. V. Grakova
Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center
Russian Federation

Tomsk


Competing Interests:

None



A. N. Maltseva
Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center
Russian Federation

Tomsk


Competing Interests:

None



A. V. Mochula
Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center
Russian Federation

Tomsk


Competing Interests:

None



A. M. Gusakova
Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center
Russian Federation

Tomsk


Competing Interests:

None



M. V. Soldatenko
Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center
Russian Federation

Tomsk


Competing Interests:

None



G. V. Kovalenko
Siberian State Medical University
Russian Federation

Tomsk


Competing Interests:

None



A. M. Kolmakova
Siberian State Medical University
Russian Federation

Tomsk


Competing Interests:

None



V. D. Aptekar
Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center
Russian Federation

Tomsk


Competing Interests:

None



E. Yu. Pushnikova
Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center
Russian Federation

Tomsk


Competing Interests:

None



K. V. Zavadovsky
Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center
Russian Federation

Tomsk


Competing Interests:

None



References

1. Gdowski MA, Murthy VL, Doering M, et al. Association of isolated coronary microvascular dysfunction with mortality and major adverse cardiac events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of aggregate data. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9:e014954. doi:10.1161/JAHA.119.014954.

2. Murthy VL, Naya M, Taqueti VR, et al. Effects of sex on coronary microvascular dysfunction and cardiac outcomes. Circulation. 2014;129:2518-27. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.008507.

3. Mileva N, Nagumo S, Mizukami T, et al. Prevalence of Coronary Microvascular Disease and Coronary Vasospasm in Patients With Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11(7): e023207. doi:10.1161/JAHA.121.023207.

4. Pepine CJ, Anderson RD, Sharaf BL, et al. Coronary microvascular reactivity to adenosine predicts adverse outcome in women evaluated for suspected ischemia. Results from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute WISE (Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2825-32. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2010.01.054.

5. Tang N, Li KM, Li HR, et al. Advances in the diagnosis and management of post-percutaneous coronary intervention coronary microvascular dysfunction: Insights into pathophysiology and metabolic risk interactions. World J Cardiol. 2025;17(2):103950. doi:10.4330/wjc.v17.i2.103950.

6. Mehta PK, Thomson LEJ, Slomka PJ, et al. Cardiac Sympathetic Activity by 123I-MetaIodobenzylguanidine Imaging in Women With Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: A Pilot Study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021;14(9):1873-5. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.03.031.

7. Kopeva KV, Maltseva AN, Mochula AV, et al. Adverse cardiovascular events in patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction: results of a 12-month follow-up with a control group. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2023;28(3):5269. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2023-5269.

8. Mochula AV, Mochula OV, Maltseva AN, et al. Quantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow by dynamic single photon emission computed tomography: relationship with ECG changes and biochemical markers of damage in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Siberian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2023;38(3):66-74. (In Russ.) doi:10.29001/2073-8552-2023-39-3-66-74.

9. Grakova EV, Kopeva KV, Gusakova AM, et al. Heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction in non-obstructive coronary artery disease: clinical utility of heart rate variability. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2023;22(2):28-38. (In Russ.) doi:10.20538/1682-0363-2023-2-28-38.

10. Vancheri F, Longo G, Vancheri S, et al. Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction. J. Clin. Med. 2020;9:2880. doi:10.3390/jcm9092880.

11. Duncker DJ, Koller A, Merkus D, et al. Regulation of coronary blood flow in health and ischemic heart disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2015;57(5):409-22. doi:10.1016/j.pcad.2014.12.002.

12. Ong P, Athanasiadis A, Borgulya G, et al. High Prevalence of a Pathological Response to Acetylcholine Testing in Patients With Stable Angina Pectoris and Unobstructed Coronary Arteries: The ACOVA Study (Abnormal Coronary Vasomotion in patients with stable angina and unobstructed coronary arteries). Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(7):655-62. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.015.

13. Van de Hoef TP, Siebes M, Spaan JA, et al. Fundamentals in clinical coronary physiology: why coronary flow is more important than coronary pressure. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(47):3312-9a. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv235.

14. Sacco MA, Gualtieri S, Cordasco F, et al. The Role of Adrenomedullin as a Predictive Marker of the Risk of Death and Adverse Clinical Events: A Review of the Literature. J. Clin. Med. 2024;13:4847. doi:10.3390/jcm13164847.

15. Grakova EV, Kopeva KV, Gusakova AM, et al. Significance of catestatin in the pathogenesis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in patients with non-obstructivec oronary artery disease. Russian Journal of Cardiology.2023;28(11):5568. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2023-5568.


Supplementary files

  • Norepinephrine, adrenomedullin and catestatin levels did not differ significantly between patients with or without coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD).
  • Cathestatin concentrations were significantly correlated with resting myocardial flow and heart rate variability parameters. Serum norepinephrine levels were associated with myocardial flow reserve, while adrenomedullin levels — with mean NN.
  • The only independent factors associated with  CMD were rMSSD ≤60 ms and body mass index ≥27,8 kg/m2.

Review

For citations:


Kopyeva K.V., Grakova E.V., Maltseva A.N., Mochula A.V., Gusakova A.M., Soldatenko M.V., Kovalenko G.V., Kolmakova A.M., Aptekar V.D., Pushnikova E.Yu., Zavadovsky K.V. Coronary microvascular dysfunction: the importance of markers of sympathetic activity and autonomic imbalance. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2025;30(7):6335. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2025-6335. EDN: BXXWUK

Views: 147


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1560-4071 (Print)
ISSN 2618-7620 (Online)