Preview

Russian Journal of Cardiology

Advanced search

Lethal risk index — a novel tool for predicting one-year mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2025-6222

EDN: ILTPGD

Abstract

Aim. To develop criteria for predicting one-year mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) after cardioverter defibrillator implantation for sudden cardiac death primary prevention.

Material and methods. The full study protocol was completed by 451 patients with HFrEF referred for cardioverter defibrillator implantation for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. The study participants underwent preimplantation clinical and paraclinical screening, as well as 12-month prospective follow-up to assess one-year mortality due to cardiovascular events. To solve the problem, training and test samples were formed.

Results. One-year mortality due to cardiovascular events in the training group were registered in 35 patients (11%). Univariate analysis identified 6 factors with the highest prognostic potential (p<0,1) associated with the studied endpoint. These included clinical data (history of hypertension and/or obesity), echocardiographic (left ventricular ejection fraction <25%, eccentric left ventricular myocardial hypertrophy) and laboratory parameters (glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1,73 m2, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide >2000 pg/ml). Based on the regression coefficients, each factor was assigned points, the sum of which determined the original lethal risk index (LRI) value. LRI >3 allow predicting the one-year cardiovascular death probability in patients with heart failure with a sensitivity of 85,7% and a specificity of 76,8%. LRI in patients of the test sample demonstrated very good quality of the model in predicting the risk of one-year cardiovascular mortality (AUC 0,852±0,069 with 95% confidence interval: 0,716-0,988; p=0,0001).

Conclusion. Based on the obtained data, a LRI was developed, the practical application of which is aimed at improving the provision of health care and developing a risk-oriented strategy for managing patients with HFrEF.

About the Authors

N. N. Ilov
Astrakhan State Medical University; Federal Center for Cardiovascular Surgery
Russian Federation

Astrakhan


Competing Interests:

None



O. V. Palnikova
Astrakhan State Medical University; Federal Center for Cardiovascular Surgery
Russian Federation

Astrakhan


Competing Interests:

None



D. R. Stompel
Astrakhan State Medical University; Federal Center for Cardiovascular Surgery
Russian Federation

Astrakhan


Competing Interests:

None



D. A. Zorin
Astrakhan State Medical University; Federal Center for Cardiovascular Surgery
Russian Federation

Astrakhan


Competing Interests:

None



E. I. Romantsov
Astrakhan State Medical University; Federal Center for Cardiovascular Surgery
Russian Federation

Astrakhan


Competing Interests:

None



M. G. Terentyeva
Federal Center for Cardiovascular Surgery
Russian Federation

Astrakhan


Competing Interests:

None



A. M. Abdulkadyrov
Federal Center for Cardiovascular Surgery
Russian Federation

Astrakhan


Competing Interests:

None



D. R. Paskeev
Federal Center for Cardiovascular Surgery
Russian Federation

Astrakhan


Competing Interests:

None



E. A. Kulikova
Federal Center for Cardiovascular Surgery
Russian Federation

Astrakhan


Competing Interests:

None



D. O. Klimchuk
Federal Center for Cardiovascular Surgery
Russian Federation

Astrakhan


Competing Interests:

None



O. V. Petrova
Astrakhan State Medical University; Federal Center for Cardiovascular Surgery
Russian Federation

Astrakhan


Competing Interests:

None



A. A. Nechepurenko
Federal Center for Cardiovascular Surgery
Russian Federation

Astrakhan


Competing Interests:

None



V. N. Kolesnikov
Federal Center for Cardiovascular Surgery
Russian Federation

Astrakhan


Competing Interests:

None



S. A. Boytsov
Chazov National Medical Research Center of Cardiology
Russian Federation

Moscow


Competing Interests:

None



References

1. Zeppenfeld K, Tfelt-Hansen J, de Riva M, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(40):3997-4126. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac262.

2. Loungani RS, Teerlink JR, Metra M, et al. Cause of Death in Patients With Acute Heart Failure. JACC Heart Fail. 2020;8:999-1008. doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2020.09.010.

3. Lebedeva VK, Lebedev DS. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator: decision-making on turning off in patients with end-stage heart failure. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020; 25(9):3868. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2020-3868.

4. Galyavich AS, Tereshchenko SN, Uskach TM, et al. 2024 Clinical practice guide-lines for Chronic heart failure. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2024;29(11):6162. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2024-6162.

5. Barsheshet A, Moss AJ, Huang DT, et al. Applicability of a Risk Score for Prediction of the Long-Term (8-Year) Benefit of the Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:2075-79. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.036.

6. Bilchick KC, Wang Y, Cheng A, et al. Seattle Heart Failure and Proportional Risk Models Predict Benefit From Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:2606-18. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.568.

7. Younis A, Goldberger JJ, Kutyifa V, et al. Predicted benefit of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: the MADIT-ICD benefit score. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:1676-84. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa1057.

8. Ilov NN, Boytsov SA, Nechepurenko AA. Whether to implant a defibrillator or not? The Possibility of Using the MADIT-ICD Benefit Score Calculator in Real Practice. Kardiologiia. 2024;64(2):27-33. (In Russ.) doi:10.18087/cardio.2024.2.n2447.

9. Butler J, Yang M, Manzi MA, et al. Clinical Course of Patients With Worsening Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:935-44. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.049.

10. Bardy GH, Lee KL, Mark DB, et al. Amiodarone or an Implantable Cardioverter–Defibrillator for Congestive Heart Failure. New England Journal of Medicine. 2005;352:225-37. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa043399.

11. Moss AJ, Zareba W, Hall WJ, et al. Prophylactic Implantation of a Defibrillator in Patients with Myocardial Infarction and Reduced Ejection Fraction. New England Journal of Medicine. 2002;346:877-83. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa013474.

12. Stein KM, Mittal S, Gilliam FR, et al. Predictors of early mortality in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients. Europace. 2009;11:734-40. doi:10.1093/europace/eup055.

13. Barra S, Duehmke R, Providência R, et al. Very long-term survival and late sudden cardiac death in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:2121-7. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz238.

14. Britton KA, Gaziano JM, Djoussé L. Normal systolic blood pressure and risk of heart failure in US male physicians. Eur J Heart Fail. 2009;11:1129-34. doi:10.1093/eurjhf/hfp141.

15. Shen L, Claggett BL, Jhund PS, et al. Development and external validation of prognostic models to predict sudden and pump-failure death in patients with HFrEF from PARADIGM-HF and ATMOSPHERE. Clinical Research in Cardiology. 2021;110:1334-49. doi:10.1007/s00392-021-01888-x.

16. Ather S, Chan W, Chillar A, et al. Association of systolic blood pressure with mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A complex relationship. Am Heart J. 2011;161:567-73. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2010.12.009.

17. Polyakov DS, Fomin IV. Badin YV, et al. Effects of systolic and diastolic blood pressure and its changes between successive hospitalizations on prognosis for patients with acute decompensated CHF. Russ Hear Fail J. 2017;18(3):178-84. (In Russ.) doi:10.18087/rhfj.2017.3.2357.

18. Ventura HO, Messerli FH, Lavie CJ. Observations on the blood pressure paradox in heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017;19:843-5. doi:10.1002/ejhf.818.

19. Oreopoulos A, Padwal R, Kalantar-Zadeh K, et al. Body mass index and mortality in heart failure: A meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 2008;156:13-22. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2008.02.014.

20. Shpagina OV, Bondarenko IZ. Obesity Paradox — another look at the problem of cardiovascular disease. Obesity and metabolism. 2013;10(4):3-9. (In Russ.) doi:10.14341/omet201343-9.

21. Bansal N, Zelnick LR, Ballantyne CM, et al. Upper Reference Limits for High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T and N-Terminal Fragment of the Prohormone Brain Natriuretic Peptide in Patients With CKD. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 2022;79:383-92. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.06.017.

22. Koziolova NA, Chernyavina AI. Risk of heart failure depending on the structure and subclinical target organ damage in patients with hypertension. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2021;26(1):4257. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2021-4257.

23. Değertekin M. NT-proBNP levels in stage 3-4 chronic kidney disease and mortality in long term follow Up: HAPPY study sub group analysis. Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi Arsivi-Archives of the Turkish Society of Cardiology 2020. doi:10.5543/tkda.2020.57746.

24. McCallum W, Tighiouart H, Kiernan MS, et al. Relation of Kidney Function Decline and NT-proBNP With Risk of Mortality and Readmission in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure. Am J Med. 2020;133:115-22.e2. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.05.047.

25. Schrage B, Uijl A, Benson L, et al. Association Between Use of Primary-Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators and Mortality in Patients With Heart Failure. Circulation. 2019;140:1530-9. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043012.


Supplementary files

What is already known about the subject?

  • The use of implantable cardioverter-­defibrillators (ICD) is contraindicated in cases of high one-year death risk.
  • There are no generally accepted tools for stratifying such risk in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

What might this study?

  • For the first time in Russia, an algorithm for assessing the risk of death from cardiovascular events in patients with HFrEF in the first year after ICD implantation has been proposed.

How might this impact on clinical practice?

  • The developed prognostic index can be used to develop a personalized strategy for interventional primary prevention of sudden cardiac death.

Review

For citations:


Ilov N.N., Palnikova O.V., Stompel D.R., Zorin D.A., Romantsov E.I., Terentyeva M.G., Abdulkadyrov A.M., Paskeev D.R., Kulikova E.A., Klimchuk D.O., Petrova O.V., Nechepurenko A.A., Kolesnikov V.N., Boytsov S.A. Lethal risk index — a novel tool for predicting one-year mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2025;30(6):6222. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2025-6222. EDN: ILTPGD

Views: 31


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1560-4071 (Print)
ISSN 2618-7620 (Online)