Preview

Russian Journal of Cardiology

Advanced search

Three-year risk of adverse outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction over 70 years of age, taking into account frailty syndrome and myocardial revascularization

https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2025-6187

EDN: OYDWSR

Abstract

Aim. To develop a prognostic model for the probability of adverse cardiovascular events over three years in patients over 70 years of age with prior myocardial infarction (MI), frailty syndrome, and myocardial revascularization.

Material and methods. This prospective study included 92 patients over 70 years of age with MI. Clinical and history data, the Charlson comorbidity index, general laboratory data, myocardial stress and fibrosis biomarkers (NT-proBNP and ST-2), and structural and functional cardiac parameters were assessed. The Age Is Not a Barrier questionnaire was used to identify frailty. The median follow-up period (Q1; Q3) was 1045 (367; 1099) days. An adverse cardiovascular event was chosen as the endpoint. Nonparametric statistical methods, Cox regression, and logistic regression were used.

Results. The mean age of patients was 77,3±2,4 years. Using Cox regression, following 3-year predictors of adverse cardiovascular events were identified: age ≥80 years (p=0,001), prior MI (p=0,011), CKD-EPI glomerular filtration rate on admission ≤55 ml/min/1,73 m2 (p=0,008), and pulmonary artery systolic pressure ≥38 mm Hg (p=0,022), Simpson’s ejection fraction ≤45% (p<0,001), left ventricular local contractility index ≥1,55 (p=0,001), serum NT-proBNP ≥650 pg/ml (p<0,001), serum ST2 ≥8,2 ng/ml (p<0,001), the Age Is Not a Barrier questionnaire score ≥3 (p<0,001), Charlson comorbidity index ≥6 points (p=0,001). Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during the current hospitalization was associated with an improved prognosis for patients within three years (odds ratio 0,28 [0,14-0,58], p=0,001). The regression prognostic model for patients over 70 years of age with MI included three following parameters: the Age Is Not a Barrier questionnaire score ≥3, PCI performed during hospitalization for MI (Yes/No), and Simpson’s left ventricular ejection fraction (%).

Conclusion. PCI in patients over 70 years of age with MI and frailty reduces the risk of adverse cardiovascular events over three years. Prediction of adverse cardiovascular events is possible based on the proposed prognostic model.

About the Authors

O. Yu. Aidumova
Samara State Medical University
Russian Federation

Chapaevskaya St., 89, Samara, 443099



Yu. V. Shchukin
Samara State Medical University
Russian Federation

Chapaevskaya St., 89, Samara, 443099



A. O. Rubanenko
Samara State Medical University
Russian Federation

Chapaevskaya St., 89, Samara, 443099



References

1. Krivoshapova KE, Vegner EA, Barbarash OL. Frailty syndrome as an independent predictor of adverse prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure. Kardiologija. 2022;62(3):89-96. (In Russ.) doi:10.18087/cardio.2022.3.n1206.

2. Ryzhkova YuD, Kanareykina EV, Atabegashvili MR, et al. Acute coronary syndrome in elderly: aspects of patients of management. The Clinician. 2019;13(1-2):19-26. (In Russ.) doi:10.17650/1818-8338-2019-13-1-2-19-26.

3. Nakamura M, Yamashita T, Yajima J, et al. Clinical outcome after acute coronary syndrome in Japanese patients: an observational cohort study. J Cardiol. 2010;55(1):69-76. doi:10.1016/j.jjcc.2009.08.007.

4. Madhavan MV, Gersh BJ, Alexander KP, et al. Coronary artery disease in patients ≥80 years of age. J. Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:2015-40. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.12.068.

5. Nowak W, Kowalik I, Kuzin M, et al. Comparison of the prognostic value of frailty assessment tools in patients aged ≥65 years hospitalized in a cardiac care unit with acute coronary syndrome. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2022;19(5):343-53. doi:10.11909/j.issn.1671-G.

6. Tkacheva ON, Kotovskaya YuV, Runikhina NK, et al. Сlinical guidelines frailty. Russian Journal of Geriatric Medicine. 2020;(1):11-46. (In Russ.) doi:10.37586/2686-8636-1-202011-46.

7. Tkacheva ON, Kotovskaya YuV, Runikhina NK, et al. Сlinical guidelines frailty. Part 2. Russian Journal of Geriatric Medicine. 2020;(2):115-30. (In Russ.) doi:10.37586/26868636-2-2020-115-130.

8. Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. European Heart Journal. 2023;44(38):3720-826. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191.

9. Tkacheva ON, Kotovskaya YuV, Runihina NK, et al. Comprehensive geriatric assessment in elderly and senile patients with cardiovascular diseases. Expert opinion of the Russian Association of Gerontologists and Geriatricians. Kardiologija. 2021;61(5):71-8. (In Russ.)

10. Aydumova OYu, Shchukin YuV, Piskunov MV. Effect of senile asthenia syndrome on cardiovascular mortality within 12 months in patients over 70 years of age with myocardial infarction. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2023;28(2S):5391. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2023-5391.

11. Averkov OV, Harutyunyan GK, Duplyakov DV, et al. 2024 Clinical practice guidelines for Acute myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation electrocardiogram. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2025;30(3):6306. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2025-6306. EDN: IVJCUK.

12. Averkov OV, Harutyunyan GK, Duplyakov DV, et al. 2024 Clinical practice guidelines for Acute coronary syndrome without ST segment elevation electrocardiogram. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2025;30(5):6319. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2025-6319. EDN: CXJUIB.

13. Tegn N, Abdelnoor M, Aaberge L, et al. Invasive versus conservative strategy in patients aged 80 years or older with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina pectoris (After Eighty study): an open-label randomized controlled trial. The Lancet. 2016;387(10023):1057-65. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01166-6.

14. Malchikova SV, Trushnikova NS, Kazakovtseva MV, Maksimchuk-Kolobova NS. Cardiovascular risk factors, clinical manifestations and management of myocardial infarction in elderly and long-living patients depending on geriatric status. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2023;22(2):3376. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/17288800-2023-3376.

15. Garcia-Blas S, Bonanad C, Fernandez-Cisnal A, et al. Frailty Scales for Prognosis Assessment of Older Adult Patients after Acute Myocardial Infarction. J Clin Med. 2021;10(18):4278. doi:10.3390/jcm10184278.

16. Trushnikova NS, Mal’chikova SV, Maksimchuk-Kolobova NS, Kazakovceva MV. Manifestations of frailty in patients with senile myocardial infarction. Vyatka Medical Bulletin. 2022;1(73):27-34. (In Russ.) doi:10.24412/2220-7880-2022-173-27-34.

17. Nguyen TV, Le D, Tran KD, et al. Frailty in Older Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome in Vietnam. Clin Interv Aging. 2019;14:2213-22. doi:10.2147/CIA.S234597.


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Aidumova O.Yu., Shchukin Yu.V., Rubanenko A.O. Three-year risk of adverse outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction over 70 years of age, taking into account frailty syndrome and myocardial revascularization. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2025;30(12):6187. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2025-6187. EDN: OYDWSR

Views: 78

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1560-4071 (Print)
ISSN 2618-7620 (Online)