Parameters of the systemic inflammatory response and their relationship with atrial fibrillation in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention
https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2025-6175
EDN: LKJGTI
Abstract
Aim. To assess the predictive potential of inflammatory response indicators for risk stratification of newonset atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with STelevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Material and methods. We analyzed data from 4152 electronic health records of patients with STEMI (2858 men and 1294 women). Two following groups were identified: the first group included 3781 (91,1%) patients without cardiac arrhythmia (CA), while the second group included 371 (8,9%) patients with newonset AF after PCI (POAF). The state of coronary flow after PCI was assessed using the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) score. Previously developed (neutrophil/lymphocyte (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte (PLR), monocyte/lymphocyte (MLR), systemic immune inflammation index (SII), systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) and systemic inflammation total index (AISI)) and novel inflammatory response indicators (neutrophil/eosinophil ratio (NER) and neutrophil/basophil ratio (NBR)) were calculated.
Results. In patients with STEMI with AF and without CAs after PCI with different TIMI levels indicated more pronounced inflammatory response changes with a combination of POAF and TIMI <3. The highest predictive potential for POAF was demonstrated by neutrophil rate >75% (odds ratio (OR)=2,57; AUC=0,779), NLR >6,29 (OR=2,61; AUC=0,757), eosinophil rate <0,21% (OR=2,74; AUC=0,739), AISI (OR=2,14; AUC=0,737), NBR (OR=2,29; AUC=0,727) and NER (OR=2,49; AUC=0,725). MLR and PLR had lower predictive power.
Conclusion. In patients with STEMI and POAF, the intensity of the systemic inflammatory response is significantly higher than in individuals without CAs. The prognostic potential of the novel inflammatory response indicators (NER and NBR) was comparable to the classical ones (NLR, SII, SIRI, AISI).
Keywords
About the Authors
B. I. GeltserRussian Federation
Far Eastern Federal University. School of Medicine, Deputy Director for Research
Competing Interests:
no conflict
K. I. Shahgeldyan
Russian Federation
Vladivostok
R. L. Pak
Russian Federation
Vladivostok
I. G. Domzhalov
Russian Federation
Vladivostok
E. An. Kokarev
Russian Federation
Vladivostok
V. N. Kotelnikov
Russian Federation
Vladivostok
References
1. Zykov MV, Barbarash OL. Pathogenesis and clinical significance of atrial fibrillation in myocardial infarction. Russ J of Cardiol. 2021;26(2):4307. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2021-43073.
2. Gonzalez-Pacheco H, Marquez MF, Arias-Mendoza A, et al. Clinical features and in-hospital mortality associated with different types of atrial fibrillation in patients with acute coronary syndrome with and without ST elevation. J Cardiol. 2015;66:148-54. doi:10.1016/j.jjcc.2014.11.001.
3. Laxmi Narayan Goit, Shaning Yang. Slow Blood Flow after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction, Unstable Angina and Coronary Total Occlusion. Global Journal of Life Sciences. 2021;2(1): 37-44. doi:10.46633/gjls.020105
4. Chen X., Shao M., Zhang, T. et al. Value of Hematological Parameters in Predicting Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events after PCI in Patients with Acute STEMI. Chinese General Practice. 2020;23(27): 3389-3395. doi: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2020.00.245
5. Emrah A., Uğur A., Merve L. Role of Systemic Immune-Inflammatory Index in Predicting the Development of In-Hospital Malignant Ventricular Arrhythmia in Patients with ST-Elevated Myocardial Infarction. Angiology. 2022;74(9). DOI:10.1177/00033197221121435
6. Rostami А., Tajlil А., Separham А. et al. Association between Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and the Systemic Inflammatory Immunologic Index and the Angiographic SYNTAX Score and the TIMI Flow Grade in Acute STEMI: A Cohort Study. J Tehran Heart Cent. 2021;16(4):147–155. doi: 10.18502/jthc.v16i4.8600
7. Dolu А.К., Karayiğit О., Ozkan С. et al. Relationship between intracoronary thrombus burden and systemic immune-inflammation index in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Acta Cardiologica. 2023;78(1):72-79. doi:10.1080/00015385.2022.2035082
8. Wang J, Hu S, Liang C, Ling Y. The association between systemic inflammatory response index and new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with ST-elevated myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders. 2022;22:525. doi:10.1186/s12872-022-02989-9
9. Geltser B.I., Shahgeldyan K.I., Domzhalov I.G. et al. Parameters of complete blood count and coronary lesions in predicting inhospital mortality in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2024;29(2):5549. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2024-5549.
10. Khubulava G.G., Kozlov K.L., Shishkevich A.N. et al. Predictors of myocardial reperfusion syndrome: a modern view of the issue and current problems. Part 1: Reperfusion arrhythmias, injury and stunning myocardium (review of literature). Regional blood circulation and microcirculation. 2021;20(2):20-26. (In Russ.) doi:10.24884/1682-6655-2021-20-2-20-26.
11. Kaplangoray М., Toprak К., Deveci Е. et al. Could Pan‑Immune‑Inflammation Value be a Marker for the Diagnosis of Coronary Slow Flow Phenomenon? Cardiovascular Toxicology. 2024. 24:519–526.doi:10.1007/s12012-024-09855-4
12. Shvarts V.A., Talibova S.M., Sokolskaya M.A. et al. Association of novel biomarkers of systemic inflammation with atherosclerosis and its severity. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2024;29(8):6025. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2024-6025.
13. Savitskiy A.A., Rudnov V.A. Clinical significance of eosinopenia in surgical patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Ural Medical journal. 2015:7(130):132-141. (In Russ).
14. Konishi T., Funayama N., Yamamoto T. et al. Prognostic Value of Eosinophil to Leukocyte Ratio in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. 2017;24(8): 827-840. doi:10.5551/jat.37937
15. Sicklinger F., Meyer I.S., Li X. et al. Basophils balance healing after myocardial infarction via IL-4/IL-13. J Clin Invest. 2021;131(13):e136778. doi:10.1172/JCI136778.
16. Yoon G.S., Choi S.H., Woo S.I. et al. Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio at Emergency Room Predicts Mechanical Complications of ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Journal of Korean Medical Science. 2021; 36(19): e131. doi:10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e131
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Geltser B.I., Shahgeldyan K.I., Pak R.L., Domzhalov I.G., Kokarev E.A., Kotelnikov V.N. Parameters of the systemic inflammatory response and their relationship with atrial fibrillation in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2025;30(5):6175. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2025-6175. EDN: LKJGTI