Preview

Russian Journal of Cardiology

Advanced search

Efficiency of prognostic scores in predicting the new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention

https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2024-6125

EDN: ZDFYDZ

Abstract

Aim. To compare the effectiveness of the POAF, PAFAC, COM-AF, HATCH, ms2HEST and CHA2DS2-VASc scores for predicting new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), as well as to develop novel prognostic models based on machine learning methods.

Material and methods. This single-center retrospective study was conducted using data from 3449 electronic health records of patients with STEMI. Two groups of individuals were identified, the first of which included 312 (9%) patients with new-onset AF in the postoperative period of PCI, and the second — 3139 (91%) patients without cardiac arrhythmia. To predict AF, univariate and multivariate logistic regression (ULR and MLR), decision tree (DT), artificial neural networks (ANN) were used.

Results. The study results showed that of the 6 analyzed scores, only 4 (mc2HEST, COM-AF, CHA2DS2-VASc and HATCH) have an acceptable prognostic potential for new-onset AF after PCI, which was documented by the AUC metrics in the ULR models developed on the basis of the sum of points of each score (AUC — 0,736, 0,731, 0,71 and 0,702, respectively). The integrative ANN model, combining the prognostic resource of 6 scores, demonstrated higher accuracy than the DT and MLR models (AUC — 0,759 vs 0,745 and 0,755, p-value<0,0001).

Conclusion. Further studies aimed at improving the quality of AF prognostic models in patients with STEMI after PCI may involve searching for novel predictors characterizing severity of coronary involvement and effectiveness of its restoration, inflammatory response, myocardial electrophysiological status, etc.

About the Authors

R. L. Pak
Far Eastern Federal University; Primorsky Regional Clinical Hospital № 1
Russian Federation

Regina L. Pak - School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Department of Clinical Medicine, assistant.

Vladivostok


Competing Interests:

no conflict



B. I. Geltser
Far Eastern Federal University
Russian Federation

Boris I. Geltser.

Vladivostok


Competing Interests:

no conflict



K. I. Shahgeldyan
Far Eastern Federal University; Vladivostok State University
Russian Federation

Karina I. Shakhgeldyan - Director of the Institute of Information Technologies.

Vladivostok


Competing Interests:

no conflict



N. S. Kuksin
Far Eastern Federal University
Russian Federation

Nikita S. Kuksin– undergraduate.

Vladivostok


Competing Interests:

no conflict



E. A. Kokarev
Primorsky Regional Clinical Hospital № 1
Russian Federation

Evgeny A. Kokarev - Head of the Department of Resuscitation and Intensive Care of the Department of Resuscitation and Intensive Care of the Regional Vascular Center.

Vladivostok


Competing Interests:

no conflict



V. N. Kotelnikov
Far Eastern Federal University
Russian Federation

Vladimir N. Kotelnikov - School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Department of Clinical Medicine, Professor.

Vladivostok


Competing Interests:

no conflict



References

1. Zykov MV, Barbarash OL. Pathogenesis and clinical significance of atrial fibrillation in myocardial infarction. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2021;26(2):4307. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2021-4307.

2. Braga CG, Ramos V, Martins J, et al. Impact of atrial fibrillation type during acute coronary syndromes: Clinical features and prognosis. Rev Port Cardiol. 2015;34(6):403-10. doi:10.1016/j.repc.2015.01.010.

3. Karataş MB, Çanga Y, İpek G, et al. Association of admission serum laboratory parameters with new-onset atrial fibrillation after a primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Coronary Artery Disease. 2016;27:128-34. doi:10.1097/MCA.0000000000000333.

4. Mariscalco G, Biancari F, Zanobini M, et al. Bedside Tool for Predicting the Risk of Post-operative Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery: The POAF Score. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3:e000752. doi:10.1161/JAHA.113.000752.

5. Lin SZ, Crawford TC, Suarez-Pierre A, et al. A Novel Risk Score to Predict New Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. The Heart Surgery Forum. 2018;21(6). doi:10.1532/hsf.2151.

6. Burgos LM, Ramírez AG, Seoane L, et al. New Combined Risk Score to Predict Atrial Fibrillation after Cardiac Surgery: COM-AF. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia. 2021; 24(4):458-63. doi:10.4103/aca.ACA_34_20.

7. Li YG, Pastori D, Farcomeni A, et al. A Simple Clinical Risk Score (C2HEST) for Predicting Incident Atrial Fibrillation in Asian Subjects. Chest. 2019;155(3):510-8. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2018.09.011.

8. Biccirè FG, Tanzilli G, Prati F, et al. Prediction of new onset atrial fibrillation in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention using the C2HEST and mC2HEST scores: A report from the multicenter REALE-ACS registry. International Journal of Cardiology. 2023;386:45-9. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.05.023.

9. Geltser BI, Domzhalov IG, Shahgeldyan KI, et al. Prediction of Hospital Mortality in Patients with ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Evolution of Risk Measurement Techniques and Assessment of Their Effectiveness (Review). Sovremennye tehnologii v medicine. 2024;16(4):61. (In Russ.) doi:10.17691/stm2024.16.4.07.

10. Geltser BI, Shahgeldyan KI, Domzhalov IG, et al. Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness of Riskometer Scales in Predicting the Risk of in-Hospital Mortality in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Kardiologiia. 2024;64(8):48-55. (In Russ.) doi:10.18087/cardio.2024.8.n2602.

11. Pandey A, Okaj I, Ichhpuniani S, et al. Risk Scores for Prediction of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Cardiol. 2023;209:232-40. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.08.161.

12. Burgos LM, Seoane L, Parodi JB, et al. Postoperative atrial fibrillation is associated with higher scores on predictive indices. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;157:2279-86. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.10.091.


Supplementary files

  • Of the 6 risk scores analyzed, only 4 (mc2HEST, COM-AF, CHA2DS2-VASc and HATCH) have acceptable predictive potential for new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention.
  • The PAFAC and POAF scales have insufficient prognostic accuracy.
  • An integrated model based on an artificial neural network, combining the prognostic resource of 6 scores, demonstrated higher accuracy than models developed using a decision tree and multivariate logistic regression.

Review

For citations:


Pak R.L., Geltser B.I., Shahgeldyan K.I., Kuksin N.S., Kokarev E.A., Kotelnikov V.N. Efficiency of prognostic scores in predicting the new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2024;29(12):6125. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2024-6125. EDN: ZDFYDZ

Views: 430


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1560-4071 (Print)
ISSN 2618-7620 (Online)