Long-term prognosis in patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, atrial fibrillation and implanted cardiac contractility modulation devices
https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2025-6093
EDN: GQYUYL
Abstract
Aim. To assess the effect of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) on 5-year survival.
Material and methods. Two hundred patients with HFrEF and AF were included. Patients were consecutively included in two following groups: group 1 — patients with heart failure (HF) receiving optimal therapy in combination with implanted CCM devices (n=100); group 2 — comparison group — patients with HF receiving only optimal therapy (n=100). The mean follow-up period was 40,5±20,4 months. Cardiovascular death (CVD) was considered as the primary endpoint, and all-cause death was taken as the secondary endpoint.
Results. In the CCM group, a total of 24 deaths (24%) were registered during longterm follow-up, while in the optimal therapy group — 46 (46%). Primary endpoint rate (CVD after 5-year follow-up) was significantly higher in the optimal therapy group compared to CCM group and amounted to 38% and 19%, respectively (logrank test <0,003). In the CCM group, the secondary endpoint (all-cause death) was achieved in 26% (n=26), in the optimal therapy group — in 44%. Logrank showed significant survival differences (p=0,008). In cardiovascular mortality structure, two main causes should be highlighted — sudden cardiac death (SCD) and death due to decompensated HF. In the CCM group, SCD as a cause of CVD (n=6, 23%) was significantly less than in the optimal therapy group (n=16, 36%), p=0,039, while mortality for decompensated HF did not reach a significant difference (CCM: n=8, 30%, optimal therapy: n=17, 39%, p=0,085). CCM therapy has a significant effect on reducing the risk of both all-cause (relative risk=0,591, 95% confidence interval: 0,397-0,879, p=0,009) and cardiovascular death (relative risk=0,474, 95% confidence interval: 0,290-0,771, p=0,003) in long-term follow-up.
Conclusion. CCM significantly improves the long-term 5-year prognosis in patients with HF and AF.
About the Authors
A. A. SafiullinaRussian Federation
Moscow
T. M. Uskach
Russian Federation
Moscow
S. N. Tereshchenko
Russian Federation
Moscow
O. V. Sapelnikov
Russian Federation
Moscow
I. R. Grishin
Russian Federation
Moscow
R. S. Akchurin
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. James SL, Abate D, Abate KH, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1789-858. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7.
2. Groenewegen A, Rutten FH, Mosterd A, Hoes AW. Epidemiology of heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2020;22(8):1342-56. doi:10.1002/ejhf.1858.
3. Jones NR, Roalfe AK, Adoki I, et al. Survival of patients with chronic heart failure in the community: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019;21(11):130625. doi:10.1002/ejhf.1594.
4. Giallauria F, Cuomo G, Parlato A, et al. A comprehensive individual patient data metaanalysis of the effects of cardiac contractility modulation on functional capacity and heart failurrelated quality of life. ESC Heart Failure. 2020;7(5):2922-32. doi:10.1002/ehf2.
5. Safiullina AA, Uskach TM, Sapelnikov OV, et al. The effectiveness of cardiac contractility modulation in patients with chronic heart failure and atrial fibrillation: results of the 12 month follow-up. Terapevticheskii Arkhiv (Ter. Arkh.). 2022;94(9):1078-84. (In Russ.) doi:10.26442/00403660.2022.09.201840.
6. Uskach TM, Safiullina AA, Sapel’nikov OV, et al. Modulation of cardiac contractility in patients with chronic heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Therapeutic Archive. 2020;92(9):8-14. (In Russ.) doi:10.26442/00403660.2020.09.000598.
7. Kuschyk J, Falk P, Demminget T. Long-term clinical experience with cardiac contractility modulation therapy delivered by the Optimizer Smart system. European Journal of Heart Failure. 2021;23:1160-9. doi:10.1002/ejhf.2202.
8. Pavlovskaya AV, Sitnikova MYu, Trukshina MA, et al. Long-term prognosis of patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction receiving cardiac contractility modulation therapy: the impact of comorbidity burden on outcomes. Journal of Arrhythmology. 2023;30(1):42-51. (In Russ.) doi:10.35336/VA-2023-1-06.
9. Kloppe A, Lawo T, Mijic D, et al. Long-term survival with Cardiac Contractility Modulation in patients with NYHA II or III symptoms and normal QRS duration. Int J Cardiol. 2016;209:291-5. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.02.001.
10. Safiullina AA, Uskach TM, Obraztsov IV, et al. Life expectancy in patients with chronic heart failure, atrial fibrillation and implantable cardiac contractility modulation devices. Russian Cardiology Bulletin. 2023;18(1):38-48. (In Russ.) doi:10.17116/Cardiobulletin20231801138.
11. Liu M, Fang F, Luo X, et al. Improvement of longterm survival by cardiac contractility modulation in heart failure patients: A case-control study. Int J Cardiol. 2016;206:122-6. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.01.071.
12. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(27):2129-200. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128.
13. Tereshchenko SN, Galyavich AS, Uskach TM, et al. 2020 Clinical practice guidelines for chronic heart failure. Russian Cardiology journal. 2020;25(1):4083. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2020-4083.
14. Kuschyk J, Roeger S, Schneider R, et al. (2015) Efficacy and survival in patients with cardiac contractility modulation: Long-term single center experience in 81 patients. Int J Cardiol. 2015;183C:76-81. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.12.178.
15. Anker SD, Borggrefe M, Neuser H, et al. Cardiac contractility modulation improves longterm survival and hospitalizations in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019;21(9):1103-13. doi:10.1002/ejhf.1374.
16. Fastner C, Yuecel G, Rudic B, et al. Cardiac Contractility Modulation in Patients with Ischemic versus Non-ischemic Cardiomyopathy: Results from the MAINTAINED Observational Study. Int J Cardiol. 2021;342:49-55. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.07.048
Supplementary files
- Long-term prognosis in patients with implanted cardiac contractility modulation devices with heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) was analyzed.
- Cardiac contractility modulation in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction and AF was studied.
- Cardiac contractility modulation significantly improves the long-term 5-year prognosis in patients with HF and AF.
Review
For citations:
Safiullina A.A., Uskach T.M., Tereshchenko S.N., Sapelnikov O.V., Grishin I.R., Akchurin R.S. Long-term prognosis in patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, atrial fibrillation and implanted cardiac contractility modulation devices. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2025;30(9):6093. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2025-6093. EDN: GQYUYL







































