Long-term outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a single-center observational study
https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2024-6007
EDN: JOUOSO
Abstract
Aim. To evaluate remote outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), including overall survival, freedom from cardiovascular death, permanent pacemaker implantation, and repeat valve replacement.
Material and methods. This retrospective observational study included 535 patients who underwent TAVI from April 2015 to January 2024. Patients who underwent TAVI for moderate aortic stenosis or severe aortic valve regurgitation (n=35) were excluded from the analysis. A total of 500 patients were included in the final analysis. Males accounted for 40,8%. Most patients had intermediate EuroSCORE II risk (5,2%), as well as low STS-PROM score risk (2,9%). The median follow-up period was 2,2 (0,6;4,1) years.
Results. Overall patient survival was 94%, 88%, 86%, and 58% at 1, 3, 5, and 8 years, respectively. Freedom from cardiovascular death was 97%, 90%, 78%, and 61% at 1, 3, 5, and 8 years, respectively. The cumulative freedom from permanent pacemaker implantation over the entire follow-up period was 89,4%, and from repeat pacemaker replacement — 98,8%. The factors influencing the long-term all-cause mortality were male sex, smoking, cancer, and left ventricular mass index. The only independent predictor of cardiovascular death was the STS-PROM score.
Conclusion. Our experience demonstrates satisfactory long-term outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis in terms of overall survival, cardiovascular death, permanent pacemaker implantation, and repeat pacemaker replacement. Independent predictors of all-cause death were male sex, smoking, cancer, and left ventricular mass index. The only independent predictor of cardiovascular death in the long-term period was the STS-PROM score.
About the Authors
A. A. BaranovRussian Federation
Novosibirsk
Competing Interests:
None
A. G. Badoyan
Russian Federation
Novosibirsk
Competing Interests:
None
D. A. Khelimsky
Russian Federation
Novosibirsk
Competing Interests:
None
A. Yu. Tsydenova
Russian Federation
Novosibirsk
Competing Interests:
None
Sh. Sh. Zainobidinov
Russian Federation
Novosibirsk
Competing Interests:
None
V. A. Boboshko
Russian Federation
Novosibirsk
Competing Interests:
None
O. V. Krestyaninov
Russian Federation
Novosibirsk
Competing Interests:
None
References
1. Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Bash A, et al. Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis: first human case description. Circulation. 2002;106(24):3006-8. doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000047200.36165.b8.
2. Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, et al. PARTNER Trial Investigators. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(23):2187-98. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1103510.
3. Gleason TG, Reardon MJ, Popma JJ, et al. 5-year outcomes of self-expanding transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(22):2687-96. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.2146.
4. Baranov AA, Krestyaninov OV, Badoian AG, et al. Immediate outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with horizontal aorta. Patologiya krovoobrashcheniya i kardiokhirurgiya = Circulation Pathology and Cardiac Surgery. 2023;27(2):54-65. (In Russ.) doi:10.21688/1681-3472-2023-2-54-65.
5. Mack MJ, Leon MB, Thourani VH, et al. PARTNER 3 Investigators. Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients at Five Years. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(21): 1949-60. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2307447.
6. Forrest JK, Deeb GM, Yakubov SJ, et al. Evolut Low Risk Trial Investigators. 4-Year Outcomes of Patients With Aortic Stenosis in the Evolut Low Risk Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023;82(22):2163-5. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2023.09.813.
7. Thyregod HGH, Jørgensen TH, Ihlemann N, et al. Transcatheter or surgical aortic valve implantation: 10-year outcomes of the NOTION trial. Eur Heart J. 2024;45(13):1116-24. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae043.
8. Nashef SAM, Roques F, Sharples LD, et al. EuroSCORE II. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012; 41(4):734-44. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezs043.
9. Shahian DM, O'Brien SM, Filardo G, et al. Society of Thoracic Surgeons Quality Measurement Task Force. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: Part 1 — coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88(1 Suppl): S2-S22. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.05.053.
10. Généreux P, Piazza N, Alu MC, et al. Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: updated endpoint definitions for aortic valve clinical research. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(19):1825-57. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa799.
11. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012): the Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2451-96. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs109.
12. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary. Circulation. 2014;129:2440-92. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000029.
13. Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease: developed by the Task Force for the management of valvular heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2022;43:561-632. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab395.
14. Ruparelia N, Latib A, Buzzatti N, et al. Long-Term Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation from a Single High-Volume Center (The Milan Experience). Am J Cardiol. 2016;117(5):813-9. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.12.014.
15. Giordano A, Mas-Peiro S, Fichtlscherer S, et al. Long-term outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the Portico self-expanding valve. Clin Res Cardiol. 2024;113(1):86-93. doi:10.1007/s00392-023-02252-x.
16. Demal TJ, Weimann J, Ojeda FM, et al. Temporal changes of patient characteristics over 12 years in a single-center transcatheter aortic valve implantation cohort. Clin Res Cardiol. 2023;112(5):691-701. doi:10.1007/s00392-023-02166-8.
17. Kurazumi H, Suzuki R, Shirasawa B, et al. Early and Long-Term Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Selected Nonagenarians in Japan. Circ J. 2022;86(11): 1748-55. doi:10.1253/circj.CJ-21-0949.
18. Chakos A, Wilson-Smith A, Arora S, et al. Long term outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): a systematic review of 5-year survival and beyond. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;6(5):432-43. doi:10.21037/acs.2017.09.10.
19. Maeda K, Kumamaru H, Kohsaka S, et al. A Risk Model for 1-Year Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement From the J-TVT Registry. JACC Asia. 2022; 2(5):635-44. doi:10.1016/j.jacasi.2022.06.002.
20. Thogata H, Garikipati S, Reddy SS, et al. Long-Term Prognosis and Predictors of Mortality in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Retrospective Analysis. Cureus. 2023;15(8):e44432. doi:10.7759/cureus.44432.
21. Yamamoto M, Otsuka T, Shimura T, et al. Clinical risk model for predicting 1-year mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021; 97(4):E544-E551. doi:10.1002/ccd.29130.
22. Duncan AI, Lowe BS, Garcia MJ, et al. Influence of concentric left ventricular remodeling on early mortality after aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85(6):2030-9. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.02.075.
23. Ito N, Zen K, Takahara M, et al. Left ventricular hypertrophy as a predictor of cardiovascular outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. ESC Heart Fail. 2023;10(2): 1336-46. doi:10.1002/ehf2.14305.
24. Varshney AS, Manandhar P, Vemulapalli S, et al. Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Does Not Affect 1-Year Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(4):373-82. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2018.11.013.
Supplementary files
- The accumulation of surgical experience, the active implementation of patient-oriented techniques for the transcatheter aortic valve implantation, as well as the optimization of postoperative patient management, have made it possible to achieve high technical success rates in the transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
- The presented domestic experience of transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe aortic stenosis in 500 patients demonstrates optimal long-term outcomes in terms of overall survival, cardiovascular death, implantation of a permanent pacemaker, and repeat valve replacement.
Review
For citations:
Baranov A.A., Badoyan A.G., Khelimsky D.A., Tsydenova A.Yu., Zainobidinov Sh.Sh., Boboshko V.A., Krestyaninov O.V. Long-term outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a single-center observational study. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2024;29(12):6007. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2024-6007. EDN: JOUOSO