Preview

Russian Journal of Cardiology

Advanced search

Comparative assessment of venous congestion severity and hospitalization outcomes in patients with acute decompensated heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2024-5977

EDN: RGBFNE

Abstract

Aim. To characterize the potental of additional paraclinical research methods (ultrasound, determination of body composition) for assessing the congestion severity in patients with acute decompensated heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (ADHFpEF) in the intensive care unit.

Material and methods. We examined 82 patients with ADHFpEF aged from 50 to 85 years, who were hospitalized in the intensive care unit of the Veresaev City Clinical Hospital (Moscow). All patients underwent a standard clinical and laboratory examination, including determination of NT-proBNP, as well as echocardiography, chest radiography, bioimpedance analysis, Venous Excess Ultrasound (VExUS), lung ultrasound. Depending on the congestion degree visualized by VExUS, patients were divided into three groups.

Results. The median levels of NT-proBNP, E/A and E/e', number of B-lines in one lung segment, ECW and TBW, and the diuretics' dose used in the hospital in pa tients with ADHFpEF and severe congestion were significantly higher. Signs of congestion obtained as a result of X-ray examination did not differ significantly between groups. In-hospital death was associated with higher values of NT-proBNP, E/A ratio, IVC diameter, number of B-lines in one lung segment, ECW and TBW. The odds of death in patients with VExUS Grade 3 increased 20,9 times compared to Grade 1 (95% CI: 1,125-387,688).

Conclusion. Higher levels of NT-proBNP, the dose of diuretics used in the hospital, and ECW and TBW were associated with congestion severity. The severity of congestion assessed by VExUS and ECW/TBW are positively associated with inhospital mortality

About the Authors

E. A. Rogozhkina
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation

Moscow


Competing Interests:

none



T. Yu. Vedenikin
Veresaev City Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

Moscow


Competing Interests:

none



Yu. S. Timofeev
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation

Moscow


Competing Interests:

none



A. A. Ivanova
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation

Moscow


Competing Interests:

none



A. R. Afaunova
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation

Moscow


Competing Interests:

none



O. N. Dzhioeva
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine; Russian University of Medicine
Russian Federation

Moscow


Competing Interests:

none



O. M. Drapkina
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine; Russian University of Medicine
Russian Federation

Moscow


Competing Interests:

none



References

1. Fomin IV. Сhronic heart failure in Russian federation: what do we know and what to do. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2016;(8):7­13. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/15604071­2016­8­7­13.

2. Pieske B, Tschöpe C, de Boer RA, et al. How to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the HFA­PEFF diagnostic algorithm: a consensus recommendation from the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) [published correction appears in Eur Heart J. 2021;42(13):1274]. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(40):3297­317. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz641.

3. Dzhioeva O, Belyavskiy E. Diagnosis and Management of Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF): Current Perspectives and Recommendations. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2020;16:769­85. doi:10.2147/TCRM.S207117.

4. Ivanova AA, Dzhioeva ON, Lavrenova EA, et al. Diagnostic challenges of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: focus on echocardiography. Cardiovascular Thera py and Prevention. 2023;22(5):3565. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/17288800­2023­3565.

5. Escobar C, Palacios B, Varela L, et al. Prevalence, Characteristics, Management and Outcomes of Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved, Mildly Reduced, and Reduced Ejection Fraction in Spain. J. Clin. Med. 2022;11:5199. doi:10.3390/jcm11175199.

6. Shahim A, Hourqueig M, Donal E, et al. Predictors of long­term outcome in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a follow­up from the KaRen study. ESC Heart Fail. 2021;8(5):4243­54. doi:10.1002/ehf2.13533.

7. Russian Society of Cardiology (RSC) 2020 Clinical practice guidelines for Chronic heart failure. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020;25(11):4083. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560­4071­2020­4083.

8. Collins SP, Lindsell CJ, Storrow AB, et al. Prevalence of negative chest radiography results in the emergency department patient with decompensated heart failure. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;47:13­8.

9. van Riet EE, Hoes AW, Wagenaar KP, et al. Epidemiology of heart failure: the prevalence of heart failure and ventricular dysfunction in older adults over time. A systematic review. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016;18(3):242­52. doi:10.1002/ejhf.483.

10. Massari F, Scicchitano P, Iacoviello M, et al. Multiparametric approach to congestion for predicting long­term survival in heart failure. J Cardiol. 2020;75(1):47­52. doi:10.1016/j.jjcc.2019.05.017.

11. McDonagh T, Metra M. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2023;28(1):5168. (In Russ.) doi:10.10.15829/1560­4071­2023­5168.

12. Mareev YuV, Dzhioeva ON, Zorya OT, et al. Focus ultrasound for cardiology practice. Russian consensus document. Kardiologiia. 2021;61(11):4­23. (In Russ.) doi:10.18087/cardio.2021.11.n1812.

13. Beaubien-Souligny W, Rola P, Haycock K, et al. Quantifying systemic congestion with Point-Of-Care ultrasound: development of the venous excess ultrasound grading system. Ultrasound J. 2020;12(1):16. doi:10.1186/s13089­020­00163­w.

14. Rola P, Miralles-Aguiar F, Argaiz E, et al. Clinical applications of the venous excess ultrasound (VExUS) score: conceptual review and case series. Ultrasound J. 2021;13:32. doi:10.1186/s13089­021­00232­8.

15. Shchelykalina S, Nikolaev D, Kolesnikov V, et al. Technology of two­dimensional bioimpedance analysis of the human body composition. Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance. 2021;12(1):17­25. doi:10.2478/joeb­2021­0004.

16. Ullah R, Shiraz A, Bahadur S, et al. Frequency of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Presenting With Decompensated Heart Failure. Cureus. 2021;13(12):e20594. doi:10.7759/cureus.20594.

17. Theofilis P, Oikonomou E, Tsioufis K, et al. Diabetes Mellitus and Heart Failure: Epidemiology, Pathophysiologic Mechanisms, and the Role of SGLT2 Inhibitors. Life (Basel). 2023;13(2):497. doi:10.3390/life13020497.

18. Bozkurt B, Coats AJS, Tsutsui H, et al. Universal definition and classification of heart failure: a report of the Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, Japanese Heart Failure Society and Writing Committee of the Universal Definition of Heart Failure: Endorsed by the Canadian Heart Failure Society, Heart Failure Association of India, Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand, and Chinese Heart Failure Association. Eur J Heart Fail. 2021;23(3):352­80. doi:10.1002/ejhf.2115.

19. Longino A, Martin K, Leyba K, et al. Prospective Evaluation of Venous Excess Ultrasound for Estimation of Venous Congestion. Chest. 2024;165(3):590­600. doi:10.1016/j.chest. 2023.09.029.

20. Lee AP, Fan Y. Battling Congestion in HFpEF: Can Echocardiography Be Our Crystal Ball? JACC Asia. 2022;2(1):85­6. doi:10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.12.002.

21. Abe H, Kosugi S, Ozaki T, et al. Prognostic Impact of Echocardiographic Congestion Grade in HFpEF With and Without Atrial Fibrillation. JACC Asia. 2022;2(1):73­84. doi:10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.10.012.

22. Pellicori P, Carubelli V, Zhang J, et al. IVC diameter in patients with chronic heart failure: relationships and prognostic significance. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6(1):16­28. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.08.012.

23. Platz E, Jhund PS, Girerd N, et al. Expert consensus document: Reporting checklist for quantification of pulmonary congestion by lung ultrasound in heart failure. European Journal of Heart Failure. 2019;21(7):844­51. doi:10.1002/ejhf.1499.

24. Torres-Arrese M, Mata-Martínez A, Luordo-Tedesco D, et al. Usefulness of Systemic Venous Ultrasound Protocols in the Prognosis of Heart Failure Patients: Results from a Prospective Multicentric Study. J Clin Med. 2023;12(4):1281. doi:10.3390/jcm12041281.

25. Fudim M, Hernandez AF, Felker GM. Role of Volume Redistribution in the Congestion of Heart Failure. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(8). doi:10.1161/JAHA.117.006817.

26. Cogliati C, Casazza G, Ceriani E, et al. Lung ultrasound and short term prognosis in heart failure patients. Int J Cardiol. 2016;218:104 8. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.05.010.

27. Coiro S, Porot G, Rossignol P, et al. Prognostic value of pulmonary congestion assessed by lung ultrasound imaging during heart failure hospitalisation: A two centre cohort study. Sci Rep. 2016;6:39426. doi:10.1038/srep39426.

28. Namba Y, Yunoki K, Nakamura K, et al. Differences in extracellular fluid volume between acute heart failure patients with and without high systolic blood pressure. ESC Heart Fail. 2022;9(5):3358­66. doi:10.1002/ehf2.14067.

29. Cardinale L, Priola AM, Moretti F, et al. Effectiveness of chest radiography, lung ultrasound and thoracic computed tomography in the diagnosis of congestive heart failure. World J Radiol. 2014;6(6):230­7. doi:10.4329/wjr.v6.i6.230.


Supplementary files

  • The increasing prevalence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), high rates of hospitalization for acute decompensated HFpEF (ADHFpEF) and associated mortality rates make the search for novel diagnostic approaches urgent.
  • The concentration of NT-proBNP, the dose of diuretics, inhospital mortality and fluid volume are significantly higher with severe congestion; an association between inhospital mortality and markers of venous congestion, such as VExUS grade and fluid volume was demonstrated.
  • The use of the VExUS protocol, pulmonary ultrasound, and bioimpedance analysis should be considered as potentially the most accurate means of congestion severity in patients with ADHFpEF.

Review

For citations:


Rogozhkina E.A., Vedenikin T.Yu., Timofeev Yu.S., Ivanova A.A., Afaunova A.R., Dzhioeva O.N., Drapkina O.M. Comparative assessment of venous congestion severity and hospitalization outcomes in patients with acute decompensated heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2024;29(7):5977. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2024-5977. EDN: RGBFNE

Views: 579


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1560-4071 (Print)
ISSN 2618-7620 (Online)