Monocyte response in myocardial infarction in patients with type 2 diabetes
https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2023-5183
Abstract
Aim. To reveal the features of monocyte response in myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).
Material and methods. The study included 121 patients with MI and T2D as follows: 76 — with target glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), 45 — with elevated HbA1c values. In addition to the standard examination, all patients underwent a blood test for HbA1c on day 1 of MI, while on days 1, 3, 5, and 12±1, monocyte subpopulations were assessed by flow cytometry.
Results. Patients with target HbA1c were older than patients with elevated HbA1c levels. In the group with target HbA1c, the number of CD16(+) monocytes on the 1st day of MI was significantly higher: 61,38 (39,2; 100,08) cells/µl vs 35,7 (28,98; 40,33) cells/µl, p=0,03; on the 3rd day of MI, the number of "intermediate" CD14(+)CD16(+) monocytes was higher: 74,82 (71,78; 83,2) cells/µl vs 25,90 (14,04; 57,12) cells/µl, p=0,03, while the CD16(-) to CD16(+) monocyte ratio on the 3rd day of MI was lower: 8,32 (6 ,87; 10,03) vs 10,81 (8,90; 21,10), p=0,04. At the same time, in the group of patients with target HbA1c values, the level of CD16(+) monocytes on the 3rd day of MI was significantly higher in patients aged <71 years compared with patients ≥71 years: 104,55 (63,64; 149,7) cells/µl vs 55,20 (36,92; 76,59) cells/µl, p=0,03.
Conclusion. In patients with T2D and target HbA1c values, compared with patients with elevated HbA1c, the inflammatory response in MI is associated with higher levels of CD16(+) monocytes on days 1 and 3 of MI, which is more typical for people aged <71 years.
About the Authors
G. A. KukharchikRussian Federation
St. Petersburg
Competing Interests:
none
O. K. Lebedeva
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
Competing Interests:
none
L. B. Gaykova
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
Competing Interests:
none
References
1. Kologrivova IV, Suslova TE, Vinnitskaya IV, et al. Immunoregulatory imbalance and functional state of the heart in the patients with diabetes mellitus type 2. Medical Immunology. 2018;20(6):833-46. (In Russ.) doi:10.15789/1563-0625-2018-6-833-846.
2. Younus M, Fan W, Harrington DS, et al. Usefulness of a Coronary Artery Disease Predictive Algorithm to Predict Global Risk for Cardiovascular Disease and Acute Coronary Syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2019;123(5):769-75. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.11.044.
3. Dedov II, Shestakova MV, Mayorov AY, et al. Standards of specialized diabetes care. 9th Edition (revised). Diabetes Mellitus. 2019;22(S1). (In Russ.) doi:10.14341/DM221S1.
4. Mikhalchik EV, Lipatova VA, Basyreva LYu, et al. Hyperglycemia and some aspects of leukocytes’ activation in vitro. Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine. 2020;170(12):734-8. (In Russ.) doi:10.47056/0365-9615-2020-170-12-734-738.
5. Flynn MC, Kraakman MJ, Tikellis C, et al. Transient Intermittent Hyperglycemia Accelerates Atherosclerosis by Promoting Myelopoiesis. Circ Res. 2020;127(7):877-92. doi:10.1161/circresaha.120.316653.
6. Chaulin AM, Grigorieva YuV, Pavlova TV, et al. Diagnostic significance of complete blood count in cardiovascular patients. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020;25(12):3923. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2020-3923.
7. Galstyan КО, Nedosugova LV, Nikiforov NG, et al. Significance of М1 and М2 polarization of monocytes-macrophages in the blood for atherosclerosis risk assessment in type 2 diabetes comparing with coronary heart disease. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2017;(12):21-5. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2017-12-21-25.
8. Dedov II, Shestakova MV, Vikulova OK, et al. Diabetes mellitus in Russian Federation: prevalence, morbidity, mortality, parameters of glycaemic control and structure of glucose lowering therapy according to the Federal Diabetes Register, status 2017. Diabetes mellitus. 2018;21(3):144-59. (In Russ.) doi:10.14341/DM9686.
9. Lebedeva ОK, Kukharchick GA, Gaikovaya LB. The assessment of phenotype and specifics of inflammatory response in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and acute myocardial infarction in different age groups. Vestnik Surgu. Medicina. 2021;4(50):31-9. (In Russ.) doi:10.34822/2304-9448-2021-4-31-39.
10. van der Laan AM, Hirsch A, Lourens FHJ, et al. A proinflammatory monocyte response is associated with myocardial injury and impaired functional outcome in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: monocytes and myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2012;163(1):57-65.e2. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2011.09.002.
11. Lu W, Zhang Z, Fu C, et al. Intermediate monocytes lead to enhanced myocardial remodelling in STEMI patients with diabetes. Int Heart J. 2015;56(1):22-8. doi:10.1536/ihj.14-174.
12. Seropian IM, Sonnino C, Van Tassell BW, et al. Inflammatory markers in ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2016;5(4):382-95. doi:10.1177/2048872615568965.
13. Groarke EM, Young NS. Aging and Hematopoiesis. Clinics in geriatric medicine. 2019;35(3):285-93. doi:10.1016/j.cger.2019.03.001.
14. Fadini GP, de Kreutzenberg SV, Boscaro E, et al. An unbalanced monocyte polarisation in peripheral blood and bone marrow of patients with type 2 diabetes has an impact on microangiopathy. Diabetologia. 2013;56(8):1856-66. doi:10.1007/s00125-013-2918-9.
15. Min D, Brooks B, Wong J, et al. Alterations in Monocyte CD16 in Association with Diabetes Complications. Mediators of Inflammation. 2012;2012:649083. doi:10.1155/2012/649083.
16. Bilgin S, Aktas G, Zahid Kocak M, et al. Association between novel inflammatory markers derived from hemogram indices and metabolic parameters in type 2 diabetic men. The Aging Male. 2020;23(5):923-7. doi:10.1080/13685538.2019.1632283.
17. Hosny SS, Bahaaeldin MA, Khater SM, et al. Role of inflammatory markers in elderly type 2 diabetic patients with mild cognitive impairment. Current Diabetes Reviews. 2019;15(3):247-53. doi:10.2174/1573399814666180423113341.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Kukharchik G.A., Lebedeva O.K., Gaykova L.B. Monocyte response in myocardial infarction in patients with type 2 diabetes. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2023;28(2):5183. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2023-5183