An integrated approach for very high cardiovascular risk patients. Intermediate results
https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2022-4839
Abstract
The main objective of secondary prevention measures is to modify key risk factors such as hypertension (HTN) and dyslipidemia in patients with established cardiovascular diseases. Its proper implementation improves both short- and long-term outcomes. Telehealth technologies contributes to faster achievement of target levels and better control of key risk factors.
Aim. To establish a comprehensive personalized follow-up framework for patients recovered from an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) that integrates telehealth software and to test its clinical and patient-centered efficacy.
Material and methods. The three-month follow-up data of 50 patients (50% of planned enrollees; median age, 57 years [53; 61]; males, 84%) who suffered ACS with myocardial revascularization and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) at least 2,5 mmol/L at admission. We introduced the simple and save telehealth software for home BP monitoring and lipid profiling. The basic demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients were described, as well as the changes lipid profile, office and home BP over this period was analyzed. The primary endpoint was a change in LDL-C after 3 months. In addition, we also focused on pharmacological therapy and its dynamics, as well as on remote counseling and patient’ experience with the mobile application.
Results. Three months after inclusion, we have noted significant decrease of total cholesterol (-1,67 mmol/L, p<0,0001) and triglycerides (-0,48 mmol/L, p<0,0001). LDL-C changes were also significant (-1,49 mmol/L, adjusted for age, sex and lipid-lowering therapy; p<0,0001) and was associated only with the baseline LDL-C levels (R2=-0,521, p<0,0001). Thirty-nine (78%) patients achieved at least 1 mmol/L drop of LDL-C. Nine of them reached target LDL-C <1,4 mmol/L (and/or a decrease of 50% from baseline). Both high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-0,48 mmol/l, p=0,348), office and home BP remained mostly unchanged. The proportion of patients with target office BP levels was almost the same (χ2=3,06, p=0,08). Patients who were recommended combined lipid-lowering therapy with cholesterol absorption inhibitor (ezetimibe) were more likely to achieve target LDL-C (χ2=10,95; p=0,003) than those with single agent (67% versus 17%, p=0,003). No differences were found in subgroups of patients in LDL-C reduction. In each patient an average of 15 remote consultations have been performed (from 1 to 54 per patient per 3 moths). Investigators have had to send reminders to 22 patients regarding the need for regular home BP monitoring. The majority of patients treated telehealth software as easy-to-use and user-friendly.
Conclusion. According to the 3-month follow-up of patients after ACS who used the framework integrated with telemonitoring and remote counseling, a positive trend in reducing atherogenic lipid levels was demonstrated, but not in office BP. Only a fifth of patients reached the target LDL-C, but the vast majority had target BP. Despite the fact that the program is convenient to use, almost half of participants require additional reminders from physician on self-monitoring.
Keywords
About the Authors
E. I. UsovaRussian Federation
St. Petersburg
Competing Interests:
not
M. V. Ionov
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
Competing Interests:
not
A. S. Alieva
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
Competing Interests:
not
N. G. Avdonina
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
Competing Interests:
not
N. V. Orbeladze
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
Competing Interests:
not
А. A. Khodyreva
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
Competing Interests:
not
A. N. Yakovlev
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
Competing Interests:
not
N. E. Zvartau
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
Competing Interests:
not
References
1. Naderi SH, Bestwick JP, Wald DS. Adherence to drugs that prevent cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis on 376,162 patients. Am J Med. 2012;125(9):882-7.e1. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.12.013.
2. Chow CK, Jolly S, Rao-Melacini P, et al. Association of diet, exercise, and smoking modification with risk of early cardiovascular events after acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2010;121(6):750-8. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.891523.
3. Du L, Cheng Z, Zhang Y, et al. The impact of medication adherence on clinical outcomes of coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017;24(9):962-70. doi:10.1177/2047487317695628.
4. Lussier MT, Richard C, Glaser E, Roberge D. The impact of a primary care e-communication intervention on the participation of chronic disease patients who had not reached guideline suggested treatment goals. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99(4):530-41. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2015.11.007.
5. Clark NM. Management of chronic disease by patients. Annu Rev Public Health. 2003;24:289-313. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.24.100901.141021.
6. Tucker KL, Sheppard JP, Stevens R, et al. Self-monitoring of blood pressure in hypertension: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2017;14(9):e1002389. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002389.
7. Gonçalves-Bradley DC, Buckley BS, Fønhus MS, et al. Mobile-based technologies to support healthcare provider to healthcare provider communication and management of care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;2018(1):CD012927. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD012927.
8. Ascione FJ, Brown GH, Kirking DM. Evaluation of a medication refill reminder system for a community pharmacy. Patient Educ Couns. 1985;7(2):157-65. doi:10.1016/07383991(85)90006-0.
9. Hamine S, Gerth-Guyette E, Faulx D, et al. Impact of mHealth chronic disease management on treatment adherence and patient outcomes: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(2):e52. doi:10.2196/jmir.3951.
10. Porter ME. What is value in health care? N Engl J Med. 2010;363(26):2477-81. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1011024.
11. Sobradillo P, Pozo F, Agustí A. P4 medicine: the future around the corner. Arch Bronconeumol. 2011;47(1):35-40. English, Spanish. doi:10.1016/j.arbres.2010.09.009.
12. Eze ND, Mateus C, Cravo Oliveira Hashiguchi T. Telemedicine in the OECD: An umbrella review of clinical and cost-effectiveness, patient experience and implementation. PLoS One. 2020;15(8):e0237585. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0237585.
13. Frederix I, Hansen D, Coninx K, et al. Effect of comprehensive cardiac telerehabilitation on one-year cardiovascular rehospitalization rate, medical costs and quality of life: A cost-effectiveness analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016;23(7):674-82. doi:10.1177/2047487315602257.
14. Pavlyuk EI, Ionov MV, Alieva AS, et al. Integrated solution for very high cardiovascular risk patients. Rationale and design of a pilot study. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2021;26(7):4608. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2021-4608.
15. Kobalava ZD, Konradi AO, Nedogoda SV, et al. Arterial hypertension in adults. Clinical guidelines 2020. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020;25(3):3786. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2020-3-3786.
16. Pogosova NV, Baychorov IKh, Sokolova OYu, Vygodin VA. A new European HeartQol questionnaire for assessing the quality of life of patients with coronary heart disease. Kardiologija. 2016;56:66-72. (In Russ.)
17. Barbarash OL, Duplyakov DV, Zateischikov DA, et al. 2020 Clinical practice guidelines for Acute coronary syndrome without ST segment elevation. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2021;26(4):4449. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2021-4449.
18. Russian Society of Cardiology. 2020 Clinical practice guidelines for Acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020;25(11):4103. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/29/15604071-2020-4103.
19. Visseren FLJ, Mach F, Smulders YM, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(34):3227-337. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484.
20. Wildenbos GA, Peute L, Jaspers M. Aging barriers influencing mobile health usability for older adults: A literature based framework (MOLD-US). Int J Med Inform. 2018;114:6675. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.03.012.
21. Blasco A, Carmona M, Fernández-Lozano I, et al. Evaluation of a telemedicine service for the secondary prevention of coronary artery disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2012;32(1):25-31. doi:10.1097/HCR.0b013e3182343aa7.
22. Zheng X, Spatz ES, Bai X, et al. Effect of Text Messaging on Risk Factor Management in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease: The CHAT Randomized Clinical Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019;12(4):e005616. doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.005616.
23. Shah BR, Adams M, Peterson ED, et al. Secondary prevention risk interventions via telemedicine and tailored patient education (SPRITE): a randomized trial to improve postmyocardial infarction management. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011;4(2):23542. doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.951160.
24. Xu Y, Ye H, Zhu Y, et al. The efficacy of mobile health in alleviating risk factors related to the occurrence and development of coronary heart disease: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Clin Cardiol. 2021;44(5):609-19. doi:10.1002/clc.23596.
25. Dorje T, Zhao G, Tso K, et al. Smartphone and social media-based cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention in China (SMART-CR/SP): a parallel-group, single-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Digit Health. 2019;1(7):e363-e374. doi:10.1016/ S2589-7500(19)30151-7. Erratum in: Lancet Digit Health. 2020;2(1):e15.
26. Brieger D, Chow C, Gullick J, et al.; CONCORDANCE Investigators. Improving patient adherence to secondary prevention medications 6 months after an acute coronary syndrome: observational cohort study. Intern Med J. 2018;48(5):541-9. doi:10.1111/imj.13736.
27. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaborators, Mihaylova B, Emberson J, Blackwell L, et al. The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised trials. Lancet. 2012;380:581-90. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60367-5.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Usova E.I., Ionov M.V., Alieva A.S., Avdonina N.G., Orbeladze N.V., Khodyreva А.A., Yakovlev A.N., Zvartau N.E. An integrated approach for very high cardiovascular risk patients. Intermediate results. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2022;27(1):4839. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2022-4839