Preview

Russian Journal of Cardiology

Advanced search

Prognostic value of calcific aortic stenosis in patients of the PROGNOZ IBS registry

https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2022-4836

Abstract

Aim. To assess the impact of calcific aortic stenosis on long-term prognosis in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) included in the PROGNOZ IBS registry.

Material and methods. The analysis included data of patients (n=541; men, 432; women, 109) from the CHD PROGNOSIS registry, in whom diagnosis of CAD was confirmed using coronary angiography during reference hospitalization in the National Medical Research Center for the period from January 1, to December 31, 2007. The mean age of men was 57,5±0,4, women — 60,9±0,9 years. The survival analysis included 504 patients (93%). The mean follow-up period was 7,3±2,19 years. We assessed the presence of calcific aortic stenosis (CAS) according to echocardiography and data on endpoints after 4 and 7 years of follow-up.

Results. CAS according to echocardiography during reference hospitalization was found in 29 patients (5,4%) with a confirmed CAD. After four-year followup, 7 patients (24,1%) died, after 7 years — 15 (51,7%). Fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events (primary endpoint) after 4 years were revealed in 10 patients (34,5%), and after 7 years, all cardiovascular events were fatal (n=15; 51,7%). In the presence of aortic stenosis, the relative risk (RR) of all-cause death at 4-year follow-up increased by 2,9 times (p<0,01), while at 7-year follow-up — by 3,2 (p<0,0001). The RR for the primary endpoint at 4-year follow-up increased by 2,8 times (p<0,01), while at 7-year follow-up — by 2,3 times (p<0,001). The RR of death in CAS patients at 7-year follow-up was comparable to severe heart failure — 3,3 (p<0,01), stroke — 2,4 (p<0,05) and left main coronary artery stenosis — 2,5 (p<0,0001).

Conclusion. The presence of calcific aortic stenosis had a pronounced negative effect on the long-term prognosis of CAD patients, comparable with those in left main coronary artery stenosis, severe heart failure and stroke.

About the Authors

S. N. Tolpygina
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation

Moscow


Competing Interests:

none



A. V. Zagrebelny
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation

Moscow


Competing Interests:

none



S. Yu. Martsevich
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation

Moscow


Competing Interests:

none



References

1. World report on aging and health. WHO 2015. (In Russ.) Всемирный доклад о старении и здоровье. ВОЗ 2015. Доступно по: https://static-2.rosminzdrav.ru/system/attachments/attaches/000/047/769/original/Всемирный_доклад_ВОЗ_о_старении_и_здоровье.pdf?1570458859.

2. Medkov VM. Demography. Tutorial. Moscow: INFRA-M, 2003. (In Russ.) Медков В. М. Демография. Учебное пособие. М.: ИНФРА-М, 2003.

3. Thaden JJ, Nkomo VT, Enriquez-Sarano M. The global burden of aortic stenosis. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2014;56(6):565-71. doi:10.1016/j.pcad.2014.02.006.

4. Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135(10):146-603. doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000491.

5. Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG, et al. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The Euro heart survey on valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2003;24(13):1231-43. doi:10.1016/s0195-668x(03)00201-x.

6. Karpova NYu, Rashid MA, Kazakova TV, et al. Calcific aortic stenosis: known facts and promising studies. The Clinician. 2020;14(1-2):34-41. (In Russ.) Карпова Н. Ю., Рашид М. А., Чипигина Н. С. и др. Кальцинированный аортальный стеноз: известные факты и перспективные исследования. Клиницист. 2020;14(1-2):34-41. doi:10.17650/1818-8338-2020-14-1-2-34-41.

7. Тolpygina SN, Martsevich SJ, Gofman EA, et al. Prognostic value of the given instrumental researches at chronically proceeding ischemic heart disease at patients of the register “ischemic heart disease PROGNOZ CHD”. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2014;13(4):29-35. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1728-8800-2014-4-29-35.

8. Тolpygina SN, Martsevich SJ, Deev AD. Effects of comorbidities on the long-term prognosis of patients with chronic coronary heart disease according to the CHD PROGNOSIS register. Rational pharmacotherapy in cardiology. 2015;11(6):571-6. (In Russ.) doi:10.20996/18196446-2015-11-6-571-6.

9. Тolpygina SN, Zagrebelnyj AV, Martsevich SJ. Influence of cerebral stroke on life prognosis of patients with stable coronary heart disease in CHD PROGNOSIS REGISTRY. Clinicist. 2020;14(3-4):43-51. (In Russ.) doi:10.17650/1818-8338-2020-14-3-4-K634.

10. Тask Force Members, Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(38):2949-3003. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht296.

11. Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Abrams J, et al. 2012 CCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2012,60(24):44-164. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.012.

12. Karpova NYu, Shostak NA, Rashid MA, et al. Calcined aortic stenosis. Monograph. Moscow: Media Sphera, 2011. (In Russ.)

13. Egorov IV. Senile aortic stenosis: century of studies. Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2007;1(1):20-5. (In Russ.)

14. Rashid MA, Yadrov ME, Karpova NYu, et al. Epidemiological aspects of aortic stenosis in old age. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2008;7(S1):309. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1728-8800-2008-0-1-472.

15. Karpova NYu, Rashyd MA, Shostak NA, Kazakova TV. Calcific aortic stenosis and osteoporosis: general mechanisms and perspectives of pharmacological correction. The Clinician. 2011;5(2):86-93. (In Russ.) doi:10.17650/1818-8338-2011-2-86-93.

16. Rashyd MA, Karpova NYu, Shostak NA, Kazakova TV. Calcined aortic stenosis: bone metabolism and aortic valve calcification in elderly people. Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2008;1(3):65-9. (In Russ.)

17. Andropova OV, Anokhin VN. Degenerative aortic stenosis: pathogenesis and new principles of treatment. Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2006;(2)1:31-6. (In Russ.) doi:10.20996/1819-6446-2006-2-1-31-36.

18. Anokhin VN, Nazarenko GI, Andropova OV. New prospects for noninvasive diagnosis of aortic stenosis of degenerative genesis. The Clinician. 2007;(2):4-8. (In Russ.) doi:10.20996/1819-6446-2006-2-1-31-36.

19. Andropova OV, Alekseeva LA, Minushkina LO. The risk factors of development and progression of calcined aortic stenosis. Russian Medical Journal. 2017;23(3):152-7. (In Russ.) doi:10.18821/0869-2106-2017-23-3-152-157.

20. Nishimura RA, Otto СМ, Bonow RO, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(22):57-185. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.536.

21. Hulin A, Hego A, Lancellotti P, Oury C. Advances in pathophysiology of calcific aortic valve disease propose novel molecular therapeutic targets (mini review). Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine. 2018;5(21):1-8. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2018.00021.

22. Tolpygina SN, Martsevich SYu, Deev AD. Enhanced risk stratification scale for predicting death and non-fatal cardiovascular events in patients of the PROGNOZ IBS registry. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2021;20(7):3060. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1728-8800-2021-3060.

23. Sachdev M, Sun JL, Tsiatis AA, et al. The prognostic importance of comorbidity for mortality in patients with stable coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;4(43):576-82. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.10.031.

24. Boytsov SA, Lukyanov MM, Yakushin SS, et al. Outpatient register of cardiovascular diseases in the Ryazan Region (RECVASA): principal tasks, experience of development and first results. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2014;13(6):44-50. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1728-8800-2014-6-3-8.

25. Rapsomaniki EE, Shah A, Perel P, et al. Prognostic models for stable coronary artery disease based on electronic health record cohort of 102 023 patients. Eur. Heart. J. 2014;(35)13:844-52. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht533.

26. Clayton TC, Lubsen J, Pocock SJ, et al. Risk score for predicting death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in patients with stable angina, based on a large randomised trial cohort of patients. BMJ. 2005;(331)7521:869. doi:10.1136/bmj.38603.656076.63.

27. Akchurin RS, Shiryaev AA, Rudenko BA, et al. Left coronary artery trunk stenosis and coronary atherosclerosis progression after angioplasty and stenting in coronary bypassdirected patients. Kardiologija. 2012;(1)52:58-64. (In Russ.)

28. Rosenhek R, Klaara U, Schemperb M, et al. Mild and moderate aortic stenosis. Natural history and risk stratification by echocardiography. Eur. Heart. J. 2004;25(3):199-205. doi:10.1016/j.ehj.2003.12.002.

29. Vekshtein VI, Alexander RW, Yeung AC, et al. Coronary atherosclerosis is associated with left ventricular dysfunction and dilatation in aortic stenosis. Circulation. 1990;82(6):206874. doi:10.1161/01.cir.82.6.2068.

30. Chumakova OS, Selezneva ND, Evdokimova MA, et al. Prognostic significance of aortic stenosis in patients suffering exacerbation of coronary heart disease. Kardiologija. 2011;(1):23-8. (In Russ.)


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Tolpygina S.N., Zagrebelny A.V., Martsevich S.Yu. Prognostic value of calcific aortic stenosis in patients of the PROGNOZ IBS registry. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2022;27(1):4836. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2022-4836

Views: 569


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1560-4071 (Print)
ISSN 2618-7620 (Online)