Preview

Russian Journal of Cardiology

Advanced search

Comparative efficacy of medication and cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2021-4491

Abstract

Aim. To compare the effectiveness of standard conservative therapy for heart failure (HF) with the inclusion of sacubitril/valsartan combination and device therapy.

Material and methods. The study included 64 patients from 38 to 73 years old (45 men and 19 women; mean age, 59,5±0,9 years) hospitalized in Baku (Azerbaijan) hospital due to NYHA class II-IV HF. The patients were divided into the experimental (group 1) and control (group 2) groups. The experimental group included 33 patients who took sacubitril/valsartan twice a day in combination with other drugs for standard HF therapy. The control group included 31 patients after cardiac resynchronization therapy. We compared clinical and hemodynamic parameters (including 6-minute walk test and echocardiography data) before and 6 months after treatment, as well as blood concentration of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP). In addition, Kaplan-Meier survival curves were analyzed.

Results. As a result of 6-month therapy, clinical condition of patients in both groups was improved. In the experimental group, some parameters were significantly better than in the control one. So, the differences regarded distance in 6-minute walk test (pu=0,002), changes in HF class (pu=0,017), LV ESD (pu=0,006), LV EDD (pu=0,001) and blood BNP concentrations (pu<0,001).

Conclusion. The use of sacubitril/valsartan combination as part of standard HF therapy was accompanied by a significant improvement in the clinical, hemodynamic and biochemical parameters of patients with HF compared with device therapy.

About the Author

U. A. Eyyubova
Azerbaijan Medical University
Azerbaijan

Baku


Competing Interests:

none



References

1. Ambrosy AP, Fonarow GC, Butler J. The global health and economic burden of hospitalizations for heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(12):1123-33.

2. Kovalenko EV, Lozhkina MV, Arabidze GG, Kryakushkin VG. Efficacy of sodiumglucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2021;26(1):4235. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2021-4235.

3. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al. American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics — 2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015;131(4):e29-322.

4. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, et al. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acuteand chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). European Heart Journal. 2016;27:2129-200.

5. Zacà V. Sacubitril/valsartan or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Cardiovasc Med(Hagerstown). 2018;19(10):597-605.

6. McMurray JJ, Packer M, Desai AS, et al. PARADIGM-HF Investigators and Committees. Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(11):993-1004. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1409077.

7. Pellicori P, Urbinati A, Shah P, et al. What proportion of patients with chronic heart failure are eligible for sacubitril–valsartan? Eur J Heart Fail. 2017;19:768-78.

8. Kristensen SL, Preiss D, Jhund PS, et al. Risk related to pre-diabetes mellitus and diabetes mellitus in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: Insights from prospective comparison of ARNI With ACEI to determine impact on global mortality and morbidity in heart failure trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2016;9(1):e002560.

9. Shi V, Senni M, Streefkerk H, et al. Angioedema in heart failure patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) or enalapril in the PARADIGM-HF study. Int J Cardiol. 2018;264:118-23.

10. Cleland JGF, Mareev Y, Linde C. Reflections on Echo CRT: sound guidance on QRS duration and morphology for CRT? Eur Heart J. 2015;36(30):1948-51.

11. Bagchi D, Mandal M, Saha M, et al. Evaluation and management of the dyspnoeic patienta challenge to the anaesthesiologist. J. Evolution Med. Dent. Sci. 2018;7(07):922-8.

12. Russian Society of Cardiology (RSC). 2020 Clinical practice guidelines for Chronic heart failure. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020;25(11):4083. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2020-4083.

13. Wang BH, von Lueder TG, Kompa AR, et al. Combined angiotensin receptor blockade and neprilysin inhibition attenuates angiotensin‐II mediated renal cellular collagen synthesis. Int J Cardiol. 2015;186:104-5.

14. Scrutinio D, Ammirati E, Passantino A, et al. Predicting short-term mortality in advanced decompensated heart failure — role of the updated acute decompensated heart failure/N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic Peptide risk score. Circ J. 2015;79(5):1076-83. doi:10.1253/circj.CJ-14-1219.

15. Grabowski M, Ozierański K, Balsam P, et al. The effect of sacubitril / valsartan on the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmia and the risk of sudden cardiac death in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Expert opinion of the Heart Rhythm and Heart Failure Sections of the Polish Cardiac Society. Kardiol Pol. 2019;77(10):987-93. doi:10.33963/KP.14972.

16. Mangiafico S, Costello-Boerrigter LC, Andersen IA, et al. Neutral endopeptidase inhibition and the natriuretic peptide system: an evolving strategy in cardiovascular therapeutics. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(12):886-93c. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs262.

17. Kobalava Z, Kotovskaya Y, Averkov O, et al. Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Profiles of Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696) in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction. Cardiovasc Ther. 2016;34(4):191-8. doi:10.1111/1755-5922.12183.

18. Morrow DA, Velazquez EJ, DeVore AD, et al. Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Randomly Assigned to Sacubitril/Valsartan or Enalapril in the PIONEER-HF Trial. Circulation. 2019;139(19):2285-8. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.039331.

19. Kang DH, Park SJ, Shin SH, et al. Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor for Functional Mitral Regurgitation. Circulation. 2019;139(11):1354-65. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037077.

20. Velazquez EJ, Morrow DA, DeVore AD, et al. Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition in acute decompensated heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(6):539-48. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1812851.

21. Braunwald E. The war against heart failure: the Lancet lecture. Lancet. 2015;385(9970):812-24. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61889-4.

22. Entresto Summary of Product Characteristics. EMA Web Site [Internet]. 2015. Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/004062/WC500197536.pdf24.

23. Rohde LE, Chatterjee NA, Vaduganathan M, et al. Sacubitril/Valsartan and Sudden Cardiac Death According to Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Use and Heart Failure Cause: A PARADIGM-HF Analysis. JACC Heart Fail. 2020;8(10):844-55. doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2020.06.015.

24. Solomon SD, Rizkala AR, Gong J, et al. Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibition in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Rationale and Design of the PARAGON-HF Trial. JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Jul;5(7):471-82. doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2017.04.013.


Review

For citations:


Eyyubova U.A. Comparative efficacy of medication and cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2021;26(8):4491. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2021-4491

Views: 620


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1560-4071 (Print)
ISSN 2618-7620 (Online)