Coronary endarterectomy in myocardial revascularization
https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2021-4310
Abstract
Aim. To compare the immediate outcomes of combined coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with coronary endarterectomy (CE) and isolated CABG.
Material and methods. This retrospective study included 192 patients with stable angina who underwent myocardial revascularization in the period from January 2016 to August 2018. The patients were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 included patients who underwent combined CABG and CE, while group 2 — patients who underwent isolated CABG. Patients in both groups did not differ in the main preoperative characteristics, with the exception of the incidence of obesity and right coronary artery disease.
Results. In-hospital mortality in group 1 was 2,2% (n=2), in group 2 — 2% (n=2). The incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction in group 1 was 1% (n=1) and in group 2 — 0%. There were no significant differences between groups in the following postoperative parameters: in-hospital mortality, perioperative myocardial infarction, need and duration of inotropic support, duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) and need for long-term mechanical ventilation, stroke, arrhythmias, resternotomy for bleeding. In group 1, encephalopathy (11,8%) and respiratory failure (12,9%) were significantly more common.
Conclusion. Combined CABG and CE is a safe technique for achieving complete myocardial revascularization in diffuse coronary artery disease, since, in comparison with isolated CABG, there is no increase in the incidence of death and perioperative myocardial infarction. However, in this category of patients, an increase in the incidence of non-lethal, non-disabling cerebral and pulmonary complications should be expected.
About the Authors
Ya. Yu. ViskerRussian Federation
Surgut
Competing Interests:
not
D. N. Kovalchuk
Russian Federation
Surgut
Competing Interests:
not
A. N. Molchanov
Russian Federation
Surgut
Competing Interests:
not
O. R. Ibragimov
Russian Federation
Surgut
Competing Interests:
not
References
1. Wallsh E, Franzone AJ, Clauss RH, et al. Manual coronary endarterectomy with saphenous bypass: experience with 263 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 1981;32(5):451-7. doi:10.1016/s0003-4975(10)61776-6.
2. Nishigawa K, Fukui T, Takanashi S. Coronary endarterectomy for the diffusely diseased coronary artery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;62(8):461-7. doi:10.1007/s11748-014-0414-x.
3. Byrne JG, Karavas AN, Gudbjartson T, et al. Left anterior descending coronary endarterectomy: early and late results in 196 consecutive patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78(3):867-73;discussion 873-4. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.03.046.
4. Visker YYu, Molchanov AN, Kovalchuk DN, et al. Surgical approaches to performing coronary endarterectomy in combination with coronary artery bypass grafting. Vestnik SurGU. Medicina. 2020;(1):15-22. (In Russ.) doi:10.34822/2304-9448-2020-1-15-22.
5. Bogdan AP, Belash SA, Barbukhatty KO. Endarterectomy and reconstruction of the left anterior descending artery: immediate and long-term results. Grekov’s Bulletin of Surgery. 2014;173(4):16-21. (In Russ.) doi:10.24884/0042-4625-2014-173-4-16-21.
6. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2019;(8):151-226. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2019-8-151-226.
7. Indications for myocardial revascularization (Russian conciliation document). Moscow: A.N. Bakoulev Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery of RAMS; 2011 p. 162. (In Russ.) ISBN: 978-5-7982-0288-1.
8. Vasileios G, Antonio S, Katerina K, et al. Coronary endarterectomy: The current state of knowledge. Atherosclerosis. 2016;249:88-98. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.03.036.
9. Wang J, Gu C, Gao M, et al. Adjunct coronary endarterectomy increases cerebrovascular accident after coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis of 17,600 patients. Int J Cardiol. 2015;182:79-81. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.12.061.
10. D’Ancona G, Saez de Ibarra JI, Baillot R, et al. Determinants of stroke after coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;24(4):552-6. doi:10.1016/s1010-7940(03)00440-8.
11. Soylu E, Harling L, Ashrafian H, et al. Adjunct coronary endarterectomy increases myocardial infarction and early mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting: a metaanalysis. Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery. 2014;19(3):462-73.
12. Effler DB. Myocardial revascularization. A 14-year overview of the Cleveland Clinic experience. JAMA. 1976;235(8):828-32. doi:10.1001/jama.235.8.828.
13. Keogh BE, Bidstrup BP, Taylor KM, et al. Angioscopic evaluation of intravascular morphology after coronary endarterectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1991;52(4):766-71;discussion 771-2. doi:10.1016/0003-4975(91)91208-d.
14. Nishi H, Miyamoto S, Takanashi S, et al. Optimal method of coronary endarterectomy for diffusely diseased coronary arteries. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79(3):846-52;discussion 852-3. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.06.070.
15. Ghatanatti R, Teli A. Coronary Endarterectomy: Recent Trends. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(8):PE01-PE04. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/27036.10339.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Visker Ya.Yu., Kovalchuk D.N., Molchanov A.N., Ibragimov O.R. Coronary endarterectomy in myocardial revascularization. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2021;26(8):4310. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2021-4310