Predicting the long-term risk of repeat coronary events in patients with unstable angina
https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2013-5-18-22
Abstract
Aim. To stratify the patients with unstable angina (UA) by the levels of long-term (12 month) risk of repeat coronary events.
Material and methods. The study included 180 UA patients, who were divided into two groups: with or without adverse outcomes (death, myocardial infarction, recurrent UA, urgent myocardial revascularisation, life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias and blockades) during the follow-up period. The levels of biomarkers of UA pathogenesis were also measured.
Results. Independent risk predictors included mean platelet volume (MPV), fibrinogen, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The risk of adverse UA outcomes in patients with MPV levels
About the Authors
I. A. Markova
Republican Research Centre “Cardiology”, Minsk, Belarus Republic
Belarus
Belarus
E. A. Medvedeva
Republican Research Centre “Cardiology”, Minsk, Belarus Republic
Belarus
Belarus
L. G. Gelis
Republican Research Centre “Cardiology”, Minsk, Belarus Republic
Belarus
Belarus
References
1. Maddox T. M., Reid K. J., Rumsfeld J. S., et al. One-year health status outcomes of unstable angina versus myocardial infarction: a prospective, observational cohort study of ACS survivors. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders 2007, 7:28 doi:10.1186/1471–2261–7–28.
2. Kang J., Ma C., L (U) Q, et al. The clinical outcomes of patients undergoing revascularization for acute coronary syndrome. Chinese journal of internal medicine. 2011; 50 (7):585–8.
3. Chan M. Y., Sun J. L., Newby L. K., et al. Long-term mortality of patients undergoing cardiac catheterization for ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2009; 119:3110–7.
4. Chang H. B., Min J. K., Rao S. V., et al. Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes. Targeted Imaging to Refine Upstream Risk Stratification. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2012; 5:536–46.
5. Fox K. A., Carruthers K. F., Dunbar D. R., et al. Underestimated and under-recognized: the late consequences of acute coronary syndrome (GRACE UK–Belgian Study). Eur Heart J. 2010; 31 (22):2755–64).
6. Maddox T. M., Reid K. J., Spertus J. A., et al. Angina at 1 year after myocardial infarction: Prevalence and associated findings. Arch Intern Med 2008; 168:1310–6.
7. Berezovskaya G. A., Ganyukov V. I., Karpenko M. A. Restenosis and in-stent stenosis: pathogenetic mechanisms and prognostic markers. Russ J Cardiol 2012, 6 (98):91–5. Russian (Березовская Г. А., Ганюков В. И., Карпенко М. А. Рестеноз и тромбоз внутри стента: патогенетические механизмы развития и прогностические маркеры. Российский кардиологический журнал 2012, 6 (98):91–5).
8. Markоva I. A., Miadzvedzeva A. A., Helis L. G. et al. The importance of laboratory markers of endothelial dysfunction after unstable angina. Actual questions of the cardiology and internal diseases. Minsk BSMU, 2013, P. 137–143.Russian (Маркова И. А., Медведева Е. А., Гелис Л. Г. и др. Значение лабораторных маркеров повреждения эндотелия при нестабильной стенокардии. Актуальные вопросы кардиологии и внутренних болезней: сб. науч. тр. — Минск БГМУ, 2013. — С. 137–143).
9. Markоva I. A., Miadzvedzeva A. A., Helis L. G. et al. Independent predictors recurrent adverse events in patients with unstable angina.. Actual questions of the cardiology and internal diseases. Minsk BSMU, 2013, P. 144–8.Russian (Маркова И. А., Медведева Е. А., Гелис Л. Г. и др. Независимые предикторы повторных коронарных событий у лиц с нестабильной стенокардией в отдаленные сроки наблюдения. Актуальные вопросы кардиологии и внутренних болезней: сб. науч. тр. — Минск БГМУ, 2013. — С. 144–8).
Review
For citations:
Markova I.A., Medvedeva E.A., Gelis L.G. Predicting the long-term risk of repeat coronary events in patients with unstable angina. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2013;(5):18-22. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2013-5-18-22
Views:
737
Email this article 