Research on the evolution of morality as a communication tool in the doctor-patient relationship
https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2020-4073
Abstract
In the biosocial paradigm of human nature, we can consider not only the concept of health, as it is derived from the definition of the World health organization, but also the socio-cultural aspects of life. Ethics is an integral part of society, and it is all the more critical for medicine.
Studies of the evolution of morality contain not only and not so much information about the behavior of our ancestors, but also about the nature of our behavior, and the mechanisms of choice regarding the phenomena of cooperation, trust, mutual assistance, justice, and others. Some of them are directly related to the doctorpatient relationship.
The nature of these phenomena is described from the perspective of different disciplines: ethology, neurophysiology, evolutionary psychology, and game theory. All these disciplines in total can indeed form recommendations for interaction with patients and can be useful to a doctor, especially those who need to maximize the effectiveness of their communication while saving resources. A patient is also interested in the treatment and saving of his emotional resource, which defines the doctor-patient relationship as an interaction with a common interest or a non-zerosum game. Behavioral economics is also included in this interaction, considered in the context of strategy choice by agents (in this case, doctor and patient), but not in the context of resource allocation. This is of practical significance in the context of working with psychosocial risk factors.
About the Author
G. A. ChasovskikhRussian Federation
Moscow.
References
1. Trivers RL. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology. 1971;(46):35-57. doi:10.1086/406755.
2. Brosnan SF, de Waal FBM. A proximate perspective on reciprocal altruism. Human Nature. 2002;13:129-52. doi:10.1007/s12110-002-1017-2.
3. Gintis H. Strong Reciprocity and Human Sociality. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2000;206(2):169-79. doi:10.1006/jtbi.2000.2111.
4. Fehr E, Rockenbach B. Egalitarianism in young children. Nature. 2008;454:1079-83. doi:10.1038/nature07155.
5. Boehm C. Moral Origins: The Evolution of Virtue, Altruism, and Shame, New York: Basic Books. 2012. p. 432. ISBN-13: 978-0465020485.
6. Krebs DL. The evolution of a sense of justice. Duntley J, Shackelford TK. (eds). 13. Evolutionary Forensic Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2008. pp. 229-45. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195325188.003.0012.
7. Bowles S. The Moral Economy. M: izdatel'stvo instituta Gaidara. 2017. p 336. (In Russ.) 14. Боулз С. Моральная экономика. Почему хорошие стимулы не заменят хороших граждан. М.: Издательство Института Гайдара. 2017. с. 336. ISBN: 978-5-93255-472-2.
8. Wilkinson R. Mind the Gap: Hierarchies, Health and Human Evolution, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson. 2000. p. 96. ISBN-13: 978-0300089530.
9. Boehm C. Hierarchy in the Forest: The Evolution of Egalitarian Behavior, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1999. p.304. ISBN-13: 978-0674006911.
10. Brosnan SF. Justice- and fairness-related behaviors in non-human primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013;110 (Supplement 2):10416-23. doi:10.1073/pnas.1301194110.
11. MacLean P. The Triune Brain in Evolution, New York: Springer. 1990. p. 696. ISBN-13: 978-0306431685.
12. Thomas AK, Millar PR. Reducing the Framing Effect in Older and Younger Adults by Encouraging Analytic Processing. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2011;67(2):139-49. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbr076.
13. Cheung MS-P, Gilbert P. An exploration of shame, social rank and rumination in relation to depression. Personality and Individual Differences. 2004;36(5):1143-53. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00206-X.
14. Leary MR. How the Self Became Involved in Affective Experience. The self-conscious emotions: theory and research. Ed. Tracy JL, Robins RW, Tangney JP. The Guilford Press. 2007. p.493. ISBN-13: 978-1-59385-486-7.
15. Horberg EJ, Oveis C, Keltner D, Cohen AB. Disgust and the Moralization of Purity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2009;97:963-76. doi:10.1037/a0017423.
Review
For citations:
Chasovskikh G.A. Research on the evolution of morality as a communication tool in the doctor-patient relationship. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020;25(9):4073. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2020-4073