Circadian rhythms of cardiac troponins: mechanisms and clinical significance

The concept of circadian rhythms

Circadian rhythms (CR) are an evolutionary conservative mechanism that allows a wide range of organisms (from cyanobacteria to mammals) to adapt to cyclical changes in the external environment due to the Earth’s rotation on its axis (alternation of day and night) [12]. In a molecular level, CR con­sists of transcription-translation feedback loop of the central activators, genes, and proteins that are peri­odically expressed in almost every cell of the body. The circadian system is self-sufficient and averages a near-24-hour period [3].

CRs were discovered by the French astrono­mer and chronobiologist Jean-Jacques d’Ortous de Mairan (1729). The researcher noted that mimosa folded and unfolded leaflets regardless of light, in accordance with its 24-hour rhythm. In recent years, CRs have been actively studied and have been found in almost all earthlings. With the development of molecular genetic technologies, genes responsible for its regulation have been discovered. In the study by Benzer S and Konopka R on Drosophila, the authors identified a gene that regulates CRs and named it period (abbreviated as per). Mutations of this gene led to an impaired circadian clock in the experimental flies. Hall J, Rosbash M, and Young M made a huge contribution to the study of the molecular genetic mechanisms that underlie the CR, for which these researchers were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2017 [4][5][6][7].

CR are not only of great theoretical value, but also of great practical importance. It has been shown that an impaired circadian clock caused, for exam­ple, by shift (night) work, can lead to adverse health effects, namely, an increased risk of cancer, meta­bolic, cardiovascular, neurodegenerative and mental diseases [8][9][10][11].

CR are important in the laboratory diagnosis of some diseases due to the fact that some molecules are secreted at certain times of the day, for example, many hormones are more intensively secreted in the morning. In addition, a large number of molecules (metabolites) are influenced by these hormones, and therefore their concentrations also differ in the morning and evening. Therefore, for adequate dia­gnosis, clinicians should take into account the sam­pling time, and when a patient is hospitalized with an urgent medical condition, take into account pos­sible physiological laboratory changes due to CR.

Recently, information has appeared on the CR of cardiac troponins (cTn) — key biomarkers of a num­ber of cardiovascular diseases (CVD), in particular, myocardial infarction (MI). In this review, we will analyze the studies published to date on the CR of cTn and discuss their possible mechanisms. There are currently no such papers.

Biological basis of cTn

For a long time, cTn was considered strongly intracellular molecules, and its detection in blood serum was considered one of the MI criteria [12][13]. The significantly increased sensitivity of new methods for cTn assay (high-sensitivity and ultrasen­sitive) contributed to changes in the understanding of their biology and diagnostic value. CTn molecules in serum circulate as a heterogeneous pool: free sin­gle cTn molecules, binary- and ternary-complexed forms. The immunochemical test kit for cTn assay includes antibodies to different antigenic determi­nants of the cTn molecule, which determines the difference in values, as a result of which laboratory parameters of the same patient may differ several times [14].

In the cardiomyocyte, cTn molecules are located as a structural pool (troponin complex) and a cyto­solic (free) pool. Free cTn molecules are the main contributors to an increase in cTn concentration in healthy patients and in reversible/minor myocardial damage during the urgent events, as well as during exercise or psychological stress. In addition, the cyto­solic pool is the first to be released during the MI, forming the first peak, and the second peak in serum cTn occurs when the structural pool is degraded.

CTn molecules are present both in serum/plasma and in a number of other biological fluids resulting from filtration and secretion processes, in particular, in urine and oral fluid [15][16][17][18]. At the same time, cTN molecules are relatively large in relation to the glomerular capillary pores and are found in urine not in all patients [19]. The probability of detecting cTn in urine depends on the sensitivity of the test method used.

Circadian rhythms of cTn

Clinical trials were searched for in the PubMed database for the following keywords: circadian rhythm, diurnal rhythm, cardiac troponin, high-sen- sitivity troponin. A total of 10 original studies were found that examined CR of cTn. Wu A and Vasile V were the first to report them [20][21][22].

Aakre K, et al. studied weekly and 90-minute biological variations in the concentration of cTnT and cTnI using high-sensitivity methods — Roche Diagnostics and Abbott Diagnostics, respectively [23]. Blood samples were drawn from healthy people and patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) at 90-minute intervals over a 6-hour period (8:30 am to 2:30 pm). It turned out that the cTnT (in healthy controls and patients with CKD) and cTnI (only in the group of CKD patients) levels decreased hourly by an average of 0,8-1,7%. Weekly differences in cTnT and cTnI levels were 8 and 15%, respectively [23].

In several studies, CR of cTn was studied in more detail — the measurement of the cTn level in the same patients was carried out every hour during the day, which makes it possible to establish the CR much more accurately [24][25][26][27]. The clinical charac­teristics of the patients participating in these studies varied significantly (Table 1).

Fournier S, et al. studied circadian changes in cTnT using the cosinor model in 17 healthy individu­als (mean age, 25 years) [27]. Participants followed a specific day regimen three days before the study — a specially designed diet with meals at 8:30, 12:00, and 19:00, physical activity in the form of 10-minute walking before and after meals. Participants were asked to go to bed at 21:00 and turn off the lights at 22:00. The quality of their CR was assessed by measuring body temperature, heart rate, and blood pressure before each blood draw. Blood sampling was carried out every 4 hours during the day. The concentration of cTnT during the day ranged from 3 to 9 ng/L, while values above the 99th percentile (14 ng/L) were not observed. The concentration peaked at 06:00, and the maximum decrease was observed at 18:00. This study demonstrated the CR of cTnT con­centration with an amplitude of 20,5%.

Klinkenberg L, et al. studied CR of cTn in patients with type 2 diabetes [24], as well as in healthy indi­viduals [25]. Comparing both of these studies, it can be noted that in patients with type 2 diabetes, circa­dian changes in cTnT levels were slightly higher than in healthy controls. The authors concluded that cir­cadian changes in cTnT levels may affect the results if cTnT is studied in screening programs, but they are unlikely to affect the accuracy of MI diagnosis using guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology.

CRT in patients with and without CKD were studied by van der Linden N, et al. [28]. The authors performed hourly changes in cTnI concentration in 36 subjects, half of whom had CKD. Baseline cTnI concentrations were insignificantly higher in the CKD group compared with the non-CKD group (median [IQR] 6,8 [3,5-9,2] ng/L vs 4,7 [2,8-6,9] ng/L; р=0,09).

In all the studies mentioned above, CR were pres­ent in cTnT, but were not significant for cTnI [25][26][27]. Wildi K, et al. also did not find CR of cTnI charac­teristic of cTnT [29]. Remarkably, in the Klinkenberg L study, the hourly differences in cTnI concentration were no more than 1 ng/L [25], while in the patient with CKD in the van der Linden N study, it reached 2,6 ng/L [26]. Comparing the results of the data from Klinkenberg L and van der Linden N [25][26], we also note that in the latter study, CR of cTnT were much more significant and could affect the accu­racy of MI diagnosis (when using early diagnostic algorithms — 0-1 h, and 0-3 h). In this regard, it can be assumed that circadian changes in the con­centrations of both cTnT and cTnI in patients with CKD are much more pronounced than in healthy individuals.

In 2020 Zaninotto M, et al. even when using a high-sensitivity assay, the CR of cTnI concentration was found [30]. It is noteworthy that the CRs of cTn correspond to the CRs of another biomarker of MI, creatine phosphokinase-MB (CPK-MB) [31].

There is another (surrogate) approach to study­ing CRs. Its purpose is to show whether clinically significant daily changes in cTnT concentration are present in patients in actual clinical practice. Ross A, et al. analyzed patients admitted to the emergency department with chest pain but did not have MI or other conditions that could affect blood cTnT lev­els [32]. The time periods for blood sampling were as follows: 00:00-03:59, 04:00-07:59, 08:00-11:59, 12:00-15:59, 16:00-19:59 and 20:00-23:59. A total of 19460 patients (men, 50%) were included in the study (mean age, 54+16 years). Patients who were admitted at night were younger, but similar in other characteristics. The highest mean values of cTnT con­centration at admission were in men (9,0 ng/L; 95% confidence interval (CI), 8,7-9,3) and in women (8,0 ng/L; 95% CI, 7,8-8,2) were detected between 08:00-11:59. After adjusting for age and estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), no significant CR changes in cTnT concentration were found.

An interesting idea is to compare the time of MI onset and its size with CRs of cTn. Suarez-Barrientos A, et al. retrospectively analyzed the data of 811 patients with ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI), evaluating the size of MI by the peak concentration of CPK-MB and cTnI [33]. The authors compared their values in four-time intervals: 24:00-06:00; 06:00-12:00; 12:00-18:00; 18:00-24:00. The largest number of patients with MI was admitted between 06:00 and 12:00 (n=269). Patients with myocardial infarction of the anterior LV wall were more often hospitalized between 24:00 and 12:00. Primary per­cutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was per­formed somewhat more frequently in patients admit­ted between 24:00 and 06:00 (86% of patients). The peak concentration for both enzymes was observed from 06:00 to 12:00, and the minimum — from 12:00 to 18:00. The infarct size was significantly larger in patients hospitalized during the period of 06:00­12:00 than in patients with the onset of STEMI at any other time (CFK-MB: 1766,84 U/L (95% CI, 1554,34-2020,69) vs 1517,21 U/L (95% CI, 1382,41­1649,81); cTnI: 66,65 ng/ml (95% CI, 56,47- 78,76) vs 53,65 ng/ml (95% CI, 47,7-60,04).

The rationale of routine thrombus aspiration during PCI is currently questionable. Meanwhile, according to the registry of Acute Myocardial Infarc­tion in Switzerland Plus, which included 3648 patients with STEMI and primary PCI in 2009-2014 (aspiration was performed in 49% of patients), the efficiency of aspiration was most effective in reduc­ing the infarct size in the period from 06:00 to 17:59 [34].

Interestingly, CRs were also found during the type 4a MI — in patients undergoing elective PCI. Fournier S, et al. analyzed the data of 1021 patients depending on the PCI time: the morning group (n=651) — 07:00-12:00; the daytime group (n=370) — 12:00-19:00. The incidence of peripro- cedural MI was significantly lower in the morning group compared with the daytime group (20% vs 30%, p<0,001). This difference remained significant after sex and age adjustment (21% vs 29%, p=0,03). According to multivariate analysis, PCI in the after­noon independently increases the risk of periproce- dural MI (odds ratio, 2,0; 95% CI, 1,1-3,4; p=0,02) [35].

Possible mechanisms of cTn CRs

Recent studies have shown that cTn molecules can be released from cardiomyocytes in healthy indi­viduals; however, the mechanisms of this release are still not completely known [14][18][36]. Recent stud­ies have shown that even minor changes in the acti­vity of various body systems, in particular, such as the neuroendocrine, hemostatic, and urinary sys­tems, can affect the serum cTn level. Since these systems have their own CRs, they can presumably cause CRs of cTn.

Role of the neuroendocrine system in cTn release. The neuroendocrine system is vital for adequate car­diovascular functioning. Lazzarino A, et al. found that stress-related cortisol release is associated with cTnT levels [37]. Minor physical activity and admini­stration of dobutamine, according to Samaha E, et al., also led to a slight increase in serum cTn levels [38]. Catecholamines are known to increase myo­cardial oxygen demand and heart rate (HR). Ben Yedder N, et al. found a close correlation with the cTnT level (r=0,637, p<0,01). In addition, in cTnT- positive patients, HR during paroxysm was signifi­cantly higher than in troponin-negative patients (190 bpm vs 170 bpm; p=0,008) [39].

The mechanism of the cTn release in sharp HR increase and tachyarrhythmias is presumably asso­ciated with an imbalance between the demand and delivery of oxygen and metabolic substrates (glu­cose, free fatty acids, lactate, etc.). In conditions of increased HR, the myocardium suffers from energy deficit and cannot fully ensure the constancy of the intracellular environment. Oxygen deficiency leads to a switch of metabolic pathways from aero­bic to anaerobic, gradual accumulation of lactate and intracellular acidification, in which protease enzymes are activated that break down intracellular proteins, including those that are part of biological membranes, which ultimately leads to permeability increase and release of cTn molecules [14][18][40][41]. The size of cTn molecules allows them to pass through the relatively intact cell membranes of car- diomyocytes. In addition, it is known that the cyto­plasmic (free) pool of cTn is located in the cytosol of cardiomyocytes, which, according to some research­ers, is released in healthy individuals, as well as in case of minor (reversible) damage to cardiomyocytes [14][18][42] (Figure 1).

Another trigger for the cTn release from the myo­cardium may be thyroid hormones (T3, T4). The activity of thyrotropic cells of the anterior pituitary gland increases in the morning, which leads to an increase in the level of thyroid-stimulating hormone, which, in turn, activates the thyroid follicular cells to produce T3 and T4. It was noted that the morn­ing serum concentration of T3 and T4 exceeds the evening values [43][44]. At the same time, higher levels of thyroid hormones in the morning are asso­ciated with a more severe clinical performance of CVD (coronary artery disease, arterial hypertension, and atrial fibrillation) in these patients [43][44]. An increase in the level of thyroid hormones leads to HR increase, and, as a result, an imbalance between the demand and delivery of oxygen, which, most likely, is the cause of cTn CRs (higher morning concentra­tion of cTn).

Role of the hemostatic system. Along with changes in the activity and functioning of the neuroendo­crine system, circadian changes in the activity of the hemostatic system may also be responsible for cTn release. The activity of hemostasis changes during the day: for example, in the morning, as a rule, pro­coagulant activity prevails, contributing to a change in the blood rheological properties towards the vis­cosity increase [45][46]. It is well known that there is a link between high platelet aggregation capacity in the morning and an increased risk of MI and sudden death during this period [46].

In addition, taking into account the role of hemo­static enzymes, in particular, thrombin, in the spe­cific cTnT cleavage into two fragments [47][48], and, accordingly, the change in the availability of anti­genic determinants for diagnostic antibodies, it can be suggested that this mechanism is involved in the formation of CRs for some test systems.

Role of cTn biochemical differences in the CR for­mation. For cTnI, unlike cTnT, CRs are practically not characteristic [28][29]. However, the reason for this has not been finally established. These possi­ble differences can be explained by the biochemical characteristics of cTnT and cTnI molecules (Table 2).

Along with numerous and important similari­ties between cTnI and cTnT molecules, including high myocardial specificity, high diagnostic accuracy and correlation with the severity of myocardial dam­age, and prognostic value in MI, there are a num­ber of very important differences. The molecular weight and, accordingly, the size of cTnI molecule is smaller, and therefore this protein is much easier to pass through the cell membrane of cardiomyocytes. And the total cTnT content in the myocardium and the volume of cytoplasmic (free) cTnT is almost two times higher than cTnT (10-11 mg/g vs 4-6 mg/g and 6-7% vs 3- 4%, respectively) [29]. Taking into account that the content of cTnT in the myocar­dium and the volume of the cytoplasmic fraction are higher, it can be assumed that the possibility of releasing cTnT is much higher, which may to some extent explain the CR differences.

Differences in the ability to cross the glome­rular filtration barrier may also explain why more pronounced circadian changes are characteristic of cTnT. Several studies have shown that in patients with CKD, the level of cTnT increases more often and reaches higher values compared with cTnI [49].

Role of the urinary system in formation of cTn CRs and cTn level increase. As previously reported, the serum concentration of cTn depends not only on their release from the myocardium, but also on the elimination. Comparison of Klinkenberg L, et al. [24][25] and van der Linden N, et al [26] studies show that in patients with normal renal function, less pronounced circadian changes in cTnI were observed than in patients with depressed renal function. This trend is also characteristic of cTnT: in patients with adequate renal filtration (normal GFR), circadian changes are much more pronounced.

The urinary system also changes its activity dur­ing the day. It is known that morning urine output is higher than nighttime, which indicates a higher GFR in the morning [50]. It is noteworthy that the factors causing an increase in GFR also cause an increase in cTn clearance — patients with higher blood pressure have higher elimination of cTn [16]. Consequently, CRs of the urinary system and factors affecting GFR may also be associated with circadian variations in serum cTn concentration.

Renal function may play a significant role in the difference between the CRs of cTnT and cTnI due to the fact that a GFR decrease is much more closely associated with a cTnT increase [49].

Conclusion

The available publications indicate the presence of cTn CRs, which are more pronounced in cTnT. CTnI level probably has no circadian variation or is insignificant. Diurnal cTn changes, apparently, can affect the diagnosis, and more importantly, the risk stratification in some emergency condi­tions, when the cTn level increases insignificantly or moderately. At the same time, the CRs of cTn is unlikely to have a significant impact on the accuracy of MI diagnosis. It has to be considered that most of the patients with MI belong to the older age group and have many comorbidities (eg, CKD). In these cases, the clinical significance of cTn CRs may be significant.

However, at the present time we are just begin­ning to study the cTn CRs, as well as the factors influencing them. Therefore, final conclusions can be drawn only after conducting large-scale studies.