Differential diagnosis of acute myocardial injury: a case report and discussion
https://doi.org/10.15829/29/1560-4071-2020-4046
Abstract
The article describes a case report of acute myocardial injury developed against the background of systemic inflammatory response in a patient with chronic tonsillitis exacerbation, who had no signs of coronary artery atherosclerosis and pathological changes according to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. The differential diagnosis and discussion of the problem of acute non-ischemic myocardial injury are presented.
About the Authors
S. A. Boldueva
I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg.
Competing Interests: No.
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg.
Competing Interests: No.
D. S. Evdokimov
I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg.
Competing Interests: No.
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg.
Competing Interests: No.
L. S. Evdokimova
I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg.
Competing Interests: No.
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg.
Competing Interests: No.
A. D. Khomulo
I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg.
Competing Interests: No.
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg.
Competing Interests: No.
M. V. Rozhdestvenskaya
I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg.
Competing Interests: No.
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg.
Competing Interests: No.
References
1. Averkov OV, Barbarash OL, Boytsov SA, et al. Differentiated approach in diagnostics, diagnosis formulation, case management and statistical accounting of type 2 myocardial infarction (Position Paper). Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2019;(6):7-21. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2019-6-7-21.
2. Boldueva SA, Feoktistova VS. Myocardial infarction with no obstructive coronary atherosclerosis (MINOCA): review (part 1): definithion, epidemiology, main clinical forms. Emergency Cardiology. 2019;3-4:4-14. (In Russ.) doi:10.25679/EMERGCARDIOLOGY.2020.82.51.001.
3. The European Society for Cardiology. ESC Guidance for the Diagnosis and Management of CV Disease during the COVID-19 Pandemic. https://www.escardio.org/Education/COVID-19-and-Cardiology/ESCCOVID-19-Guidance. (Last update: 28 May 2020).
4. Kumar A, Kumar A, Paladugu B, et al. Transforming growth factor-beta 1 blocks in vitro cardiac myocyte depression induced by tumour necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-1 beta, and human septic shock serum. CritCareMed. 2007;35(2):358-64. doi:10.1097/01.CCM.0000254341.87098.A4.
5. Favory R, Neviere R. Significance and interpretation of elevated troponin in septic patients. Crit Care. 2006;10(4):224. doi:10.1186/cc4991.
6. Collste O, Sorensson P, Frick M, et al. Myocardial infarction with normal coronary arteries is common and associated with normal findings on cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: results from the Stockholm Myocardial Infarction with Normal Coronaries study. J Int Med. 2013;273(2):189-96. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2796.2012.02567.x.
7. Siddiqui Y, Crouser ED, Raman SV. Nonischemic myocardial changes detected by cardiac magnetic resonance in critical care patients with sepsis. Am J RespirCrit Care Med. 2013;188(8):1037-9. doi:10.1164/rccm.201304-0744LE.
8. Takasu O, Gaut JP, Watanabe E, et al. Mechanisms of cardiac and renal dysfunction in patients dying of sepsis. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2013;187(5):509-17. doi:10.1164/rccm.201211-1983OC.
Review
For citations:
Boldueva S.A., Evdokimov D.S., Evdokimova L.S., Khomulo A.D., Rozhdestvenskaya M.V. Differential diagnosis of acute myocardial injury: a case report and discussion. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020;25(11):4046. https://doi.org/10.15829/29/1560-4071-2020-4046
Views:
623
Email this article 