Role of ratio-based metrics in cardiology

In cardiovascular studies, two related parameters that determine the same physical variable are often recorded. Interpretation of the calculated indicators presented in the form of ratios and differences is difficult, since they can be associated with several combinations of primary data giving the same value.

Aim. To find a way to overcome this limitation and take a more comprehensive approach.

Material and methods. We analyzed the data on left ventricular volume and blood pressure (BP) in 275 patients (women — 207), obtained using echocardiography and BP monitor. To calculate a lost companion (c) value based on a difference or dimensionless ratio, we applied the Pythagorean theorem. The lost companion is

defined as the hypotenuse in each study area. To calculate the pulse pressure companion (PP), the following formula was used: PP(c)=Ö(SBP²+SBP²). Similar methods were applied to ejection fraction (EF), augmentation pressure (AG) and AG/PP ratio, resulting in the ratio called augmentation index (AIx).

Results. 1. Mean blood pressure (MBP) acts as a surrogate for the PP companion (PPc) values (R=0,970, N=257). 2. We have identified correlations between PPc and pulse wave velocity (R=0,397, N=193), and AGc with AIx (75) (R=0,662, N=198). 3. EF has an inverse relationship with the end diastolic volume (EDV) (R=-0,559, N=187), and the ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC) correlates with ESV (r=-0,627, N=180). 4. Comparison of EDV and VACc revealed R of 0,949.

Conclusion. Companions calculated from the available data can have significant additional diagnostic value without the need for additional measurements. It is important to note that the combination of traditional ratio-based and suggested companions allows for more accurate data on individual patients.

1. Kerkhof PLM, Kuznetsova T, Kresh JY, Handly N. Cardiophysiology illustrated by comparing ventricular volumes in healthy adult males and females. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1065:123-38. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-77932-4_8.

2. Kerkhof PLM, Konradi AO, Shlyakhto EV, et al. Polar coordinate description of blood pressure measurements and implications for sex-specific and personalized analysis. Conf Proc IEEE. Eng Med Biol Soc. 2019;2019:502-5. doi:10.1109/EMBC.2019.8857346.

3. Kerkhof PLM, Mérillon JP, Yoo BW, et al. The Pythagorean theorem reveals the inherent companion of cardiac ejection fraction. Int J Cardiol 2018;270:237-43. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.06.074.

4. Kerkhof PLM, Kuznetsova T, Ali R, Handly N. Left ventricular volume analysis as a basic tool to describe cardiac function. Adv Physiol Educ. 2018;42:130-9. doi:10.1152/advan.00140.2017.

5. Kerkhof PLM, Peace RA, Handly N. Ratiology and a complementary class of metrics for cardiovascular investigations. Physiology (Bethesda). 2019;34:250-63. doi:10.1152/physiol.00056.2018.

6. Kerkhof PLM, van de Ven PM, Yoo B, et al. Ejection fraction as related to basic components in the left and right ventricular volume domains. Int J Cardiol. 2018;255:105-110. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.09.019.

7. Rotar O, Moguchaia E, Boyarinova M, et al. Seventy years after the siege of Leningrad: does early life famine still affect cardiovascular risk and aging? J Hypertens. 2015;33:1772-9. doi:10.1097/HJH.0000000000000640.

8. Chazova IE, Zhernakova IuV, Oshchepkova EV, et al. Prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in Russian population of patients with arterial hypertension. Kardiologiia. 2014;54(10):4-12. (In Russ.). doi:10.18565/cardio.2014.10.4-12.

9. Kerkhof PLM. Importance of endsystolic volume for the evaluation of cardiac pump performance, in: Cardiology, An International Perspective, E. I. Chazov, V. N. Smirnov and R. G. Oganov (Eds.). Plenum Press. New York. 1984:133952. ISBN: 978-1-4757-1826-3, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-1824-9.

10. Kerkhof PLM, Mérillon JP, Handly N. What the current arterial-ventricular coupling index fails to tell us. FASEB J 32 Suppl. 2018. doi:10.1096/fasebj.2018.32.1_supplement.848.3.