Validity and reliability of the Russian-language version of the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index in patients with heart failure
https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2020-1-3639
Abstract
Aim. To assess the validity and reliability of the Russian-language version of The SelfCare of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI, version 6.2) in patients with heart failure (HF).
Material and methods. The translation of the SCHFI (version 6.2) into Russian was performed according to the Brislin’s model. The Russian version of the SCHFI was tested in 128 patients with NYHA class II-IV HF (mean age 63,6Ѓ}8,8 years, 70,3% men). The Cronbach’s alpha, test-retest reliability, construct (confirmatory factor analysis) and concurrent (comparison of the SCHFI and European Heart Failure Self-Care Behavior Scale (EHFScBS_9) results) validities were determined.
Results. The Cronbach’s alpha for the SCHFI scale was 0,74 and characterized sufficient level of test reliability. The test-retest reliability (estimated after 3 months of observation) was 0,81 (p<0,01), which also indicates a sufficient level of reliability. The baseline level of selfcare ability in HF patients according to SCHFI was 136,8Ѓ}40,6 points. The factor analysis confirmed the expediency of dividing the SCHFI into 3 sections: A — self-care maintenance, B — self-care management, C — self-care confidence. Analysis of the concurrent validity of the SCHFI and EHFScBS_9 revealed an inverse correlation between both scales.
Conclusion. The Russian-language version of The Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (version 6.2) is a simple and effective tool for assessing self-care ability in HF patients, and can be used both in clinical trials and in actual clinical practice.
About the Authors
E. D. KartamyschevaRussian Federation
Kartamysheva Ekaterina Dmitrievna — Postgraduate of the Department of Cardiology with Functional Diagnostics of the Volgograd State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, cardiologist of the second consultative cardiology department of the Volgograd Regional Clinical Cardiological Center
Volgograd
Yu. M. Lopatin
Russian Federation
Lopatin Yurii Michailovich — Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Cardiology with Functional Diagnostics of the Volgograd State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, head of the first cardiology department of the Volgograd Regional Clinical Cardiological Center
Volgograd
References
1. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Piotr Ponikowski, Adriaan A. Voors, Stefan D. Anker, et al. European Heart Journal. 2016;37:2129-200. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128.
2. Mareev VYu, Fomin I V, Ageev FT, et al. Russian Heart Failure Society, Russian Society of Cardiology. Russian Scientific Medical Society of Internal Medicine Guidelines for Heart failure: chronic (CHF) and acute decompensated (ADHF). Diagnosis, prevention and treatment. Cardiologia. 2018;58(S6). (In Russ.) doi:10.18087/cardio.2475.
3. Jaarsma T, Arestedt KF, Martensson J, et al. The European Heart Failure Self-Care Behavior scale revised into nine-item scale (EHFScB-9): а reliable and valid international instrument. European Journal of Heart Failure. 2009;11:99-105. doi:10.1093/eurjhf/hfn007.
4. Lopatin YuM, Grebennikova АА, Begrambekova YuL. Reliability and discriminant validity of the Russian version of European Self-Care behavior scale in chronic heart failure. Russ J Cardiol. 2016;(8):14-9. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2016-8-14-19.
5. Riegel B, Lee CS, Dickson V, et al. An Update on the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2009;24(6):485-97. doi:10.1097/JCN.0b013e3181b4baa0.
6. Avila C, Riegel B, Pokorski S, et al. Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Testing of the Brazilian Version of the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index Version 6.2. Nursing Research and Practice. 2013;6 pages. doi:10.1155/2013/1789768.
7. Mareev VYu, Begrambekova YuL, Danielyan MO, et al. What questions are asked and answered by studies of non-drug treatment in patients with heart failure. Lessons from the CHANCE study. Russian Heart Failure Journal. 2014;15(6):383-96. (In Russ.)
8. Jonkman NH, Westland H, Groenwold RHH, et al. Do Self-Management Interventions Work in Patients With Heart Failure? An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis. Circulation. 2016;133:1189-98. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018006.
Review
For citations:
Kartamyscheva E.D., Lopatin Yu.M. Validity and reliability of the Russian-language version of the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index in patients with heart failure. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020;25(1):3639. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2020-1-3639