Preview

Russian Journal of Cardiology

Advanced search

Effects of ambulatory self-control on renal function and electrolyte metabolism in patients with severe heart failure

https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2013-1-79-85

Abstract

Aim. To investigate the effects of the ambulatory self-control treatment strategy on renal function, electrolyte metabolism, functional status, and the number of repeat hospitalisations in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF).

 

Material and methods. In total, 122 patients with severe CHF (NYHA class III-IV) were divided into 3 groups: Group I – ambulatory self-control after in-hospital education in the “CHFPatientSchool”; Group II – standard in-hospital education in the “CHFPatientSchool”; and Group III – controls. Group I participants could selfadminister torasemide (in pre-determined doses; under control of blood potassium, sodium, and creatinine) in case of oedema and dyspnoea development. If torasemide treatment was ineffective, Group I patients would have a telephone consultation with a doctor. During the in-hospital treatment, as well as after 3, 6, and

9 months of ambulatory treatment, the following parameters were assessed: the number of repeat hospitalisations, functional status (6-minute walking test), calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR; CKD-EPI), morning microalbuminuria, serum levels of potassium and sodium, therapy compliance, and knowledge on CHF-related issues.

 

Results. The number of repeat hospitalisations in Group I, compared to Groups II and III, decreased by 37% and 45%, respectively. In the 6-minute walking test at 9 months, the distance in Group I increased from 174,5 m to 248,5 m, while in Groups II and III, it did not change significantly. Group I did not demonstrate any negative GFR dynamics, while this parameter progressively and similarly decreased in the other two groups. At 9 months, albuminuria levels in Group I (44,5±25,3 mg/l) were significantly lower than in Group II (58,7±32,5 mg/l) and Group III (62,8±36,9 mg/l). Among Group I patients, hyperkalaemia was not observed, and hyponatraemia was significantly less common than in Groups II and III. The CHF knowledge and therapy compliance were better in Group II, compared to Group III, only during the first 3 months of the follow-up; Group I demonstrated consistently high levels of these parameters throughout the study period.

 

Conclusion. The strategy of ambulatory self-control, compared to the standard ambulatory observation, significantly reduced the need for repeat hospitalisations, improved functional status, electrolyte metabolism, and therapy compliance parameters, and postponed the progression of renal dysfunction in CHF patients.

About the Authors

S. V. Berdnikov
Orel State University, Medical Institute; Orel Regional Clinical Hospital, Orel, Russia
Russian Federation


V. I. Vishnevskyi
Orel State University, Medical Institute
Russian Federation


O. A. Berdnikova
Orel Regional Clinical Hospital, Orel, Russia
Russian Federation


References

1. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012. European Heart Journal. 2012; 33:1787–847.

2. Perkins R. M., Tang X., Bengier A. C. et al. Variability in estimated glomerular filtration rate is an independent risk factor for death among patients with stage 3 chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2012 Aug 8. doi: 10.1038/ki.2012.281. [Epub ahead of print].

3. McAlister F. A., Ezekowitz J., Tarantini L. et al. Renal dysfunction in patients with heart failure with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction: impact of the new Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration Group formula. Circ Heart Fail. 2012; 5 (3):309–14.

4. Kuenzli A., Bucher H. C., Anand I. et al. Meta-analysis of combined therapy with angiotensin receptor antagonists versus ACE inhibitors alone in patients with heart failure. PLoS One. 2010; 5 (4): e9946.

5. Khand A., Gemmel I., Clark A. L. et al. Is the prognosis of heart failure improving? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36 (7):2284–6.

6. Cleland J. G., Cohen-Solal A., Aguilar J. C. et al. Management of heart failure in primary care (the IMPROVEMENT of Heart Failure Programme): an international survey. Lancet. 2002; 360 (9346):1631–9.

7. Weiner D. E., Tighiouart H., Stark P. C. et al. Kidney disease as a risk factor for recurrent cardiovascular disease and mortality. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004; 44 (2):198–206.

8. http://www.ingorts.ru/index.php/en/m-research/m-oracul (first open study syndrome of acute decompensate heart failure and related diseases in the Russian Federation – an epidemiological study ORACLE – RF).

9. Powell L. H., Calvin J. E., Richardson D. et al. Self-management counseling in patients with heart failure (the heart failure adherence and retention randomized behavioral trial). JAMA. 2010; 304 (12):1331–8.

10. Koelling T. M., Johnson M. L., Cody R. J. et al. Discharge education improves clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure. Circulation. 2005; 111 (2):179–85.

11. Jaarsma T., van der Wal M. H., Lesman-Leegte I. et al. Effect of moderate or intensive disease management program on outcome in patients with heart failure: coordinating study evaluating outcomes of advising and counseling in heart failure (COACH). Arch Intern Med. 2008; 168 (3):316–24.

12. Giliarevskiy S. R., Orlov V. A., Khamaganova L. K. et al. Effect of therapeutic education of patients with chronic heart failure on quality of life and requirement of rehospitalizations. Results of 12-months randomized study. Kardiologiia. 2002; 42 (5):56–61. (Гиляревский С. Р., Орлов В. А., Хамаганова Л. К. и соавт. Влияние терапевтического обучения больных с выраженной хронической сердечной недостаточностью на качество их жизни и потребность в повторных госпитализациях: результаты 12-месячного рандомизированного исследования. Кардиология 2002; 42 (5):56–61).

13. Belenkov Y. N., Ageev F. T., Giliarevskiy S. R. et al. Influence of specialized forms of active outpatient management for functional status, quality of life and hemodynamic parameters in patients with severe heart failure. Journal of Heart Fail. 2007;8 (3):112–6. (Беленков Ю. Н., Агеев Ф. Т., Гиляревский С. Р. и соавт. Влияние специализированных форм активного амбулаторного ведения на функциональный статус,

14. качество жизни и показатели гемодинамики больных с выраженной сердечной недостаточностью. Результаты российской программы «ШАНС». Ж. Сердечная недостаточность. 2007; 8 (3):112–6).

15. Cueto-Manzano A. M., Martínez-Ramírez H. R., Cortés-Sanabria L. Management of chronic kidney disease: primary health-care setting, self-care and multidisciplinary approach. Clin Nephrol. 2010; 74 Suppl 1: S99–104.

16. Masson S., Latini R., Milani V. et al. Prevalence and prognostic value of elevated urinary albumin excretion in patients with chronic heart failure: data from the GISSIHeart Failure trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2010; 3 (1):65–72.


Review

For citations:


Berdnikov S.V., Vishnevskyi V.I., Berdnikova O.A. Effects of ambulatory self-control on renal function and electrolyte metabolism in patients with severe heart failure. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2013;(1):79-85. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2013-1-79-85

Views: 681


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1560-4071 (Print)
ISSN 2618-7620 (Online)