Subclavian-coronary bypass graft re-operation according to the MICS technique in a patient with angina relapse
https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2019-8-94-96
Abstract
Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) using short-scar incision (without median sternotomy) allows minimizing the invasiveness of the intervention, reducing the risks of postoperative complications, and also ensuring patient comfort and quick social and physical rehabilitation. The successful implementation of such operations is due not only to surgical skills and the integration of technological achievements into practice, but also to the appropriate selection of patients. The article presents a clinical case of successful re-operation of the subclavian-coronary artery bypass grafting on a beating heart using antero-lateral thoracotomy approach in a patient with angina relapse after CABG.
About the Authors
I. Yu. Sigaev
A. N. Bakulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery
Russian Federation
Moscow
Competing Interests: не заявлен
Russian Federation
Moscow
Competing Interests: не заявлен
M. A. Keren
A. N. Bakulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery
Russian Federation
Moscow
Competing Interests: не заявлен
Russian Federation
Moscow
Competing Interests: не заявлен
A. V. Kazaryan
A. N. Bakulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery
Russian Federation
Moscow
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Moscow
Competing Interests:
не заявлен
I. V. Pilipenko
A. N. Bakulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery
Russian Federation
Moscow
Competing Interests: не заявлен
Russian Federation
Moscow
Competing Interests: не заявлен
G. G. Getsadze
A. N. Bakulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery
Russian Federation
Moscow
Competing Interests: не завявлен
Russian Federation
Moscow
Competing Interests: не завявлен
References
1. Guo MH, Wellsb GA, Glineura D, et аl. Minimally Invasive coronary surgery compared to STernotomy coronary artery bypass grafting: The MIST trial. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 2019;78:140-5. doi:10.1016/J.CCT.2019.01.006.
2. Guo MH, Rodriguez ML, Ruel M. Minimally invasive cardiac surgery coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG): a review of technique and literature. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018;34(2):86-93. doi:10.1007/s12055-017-0614-y.
3. Ruel M, Une D, Bonatti J, McGinn JT. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: is it time for the robot? Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 2013;28:639-45. doi:10.1097/ HCO.0b013e3283653fd1.
4. McGinn JT, Usman S, Lapierre H, et al. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: dual center experience in 450 consecutive patients. Circulation. 2009;20(11):78-84. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.108.840041.
5. Lapierre H, Chan V, Sohmer B, et al. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting via a small thoracotomy versus off-pump: a case-matched study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;40(4):804-10. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.01.066. Epub 2011 Mar 9.
6. Pande S, Agarwal SK, Gupta D, et al. Early and mid-term results of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. Indian Heart J. 2014;66:193-6. doi:10.1016/j. ihj.2014.02.010.
7. Rodriguez M, Ruel M. Minimally Invasive Multivessel Coronary Surgery and Hybrid Coronary Revascularization: Can We Routinely Achieve Less Invasive Coronary Surgery? Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2016;12(1):14-19. doi:10.14797/mdcj-12-1-14.
Review
For citations:
Sigaev I.Yu., Keren M.A., Kazaryan A.V., Pilipenko I.V., Getsadze G.G. Subclavian-coronary bypass graft re-operation according to the MICS technique in a patient with angina relapse. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2019;(8):94-96. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2019-8-94-96
Views:
933
Email this article 