Preview

Russian Journal of Cardiology

Advanced search

The prevalence of electrocardiographic abnormalities in the Russian population in the early 21st century (the ESSE-RF study)

https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2018-12-7-17

Abstract

Electrocardiography (ECG) takes the lead in assessing the prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in the population. ECG disorders, grouped in the Major (certain) and Minor (possible) categories, are prognostic markers of a high risk of cardiovascular diseases and sudden cardiac death. Unified assessing methods of ECG disorders prevalence and their associations with socio-demographic parameters have not previously been made in Russia.

Aim. To study the prevalence of ECG parameters of certain and possible coronary artery disease among population of Russia, depending on the socio-demographic characteristics — age, sex, education and place of residence (city or country).

Material and methods. We used 17504 ECGs from representative samples of population (25-64 years old), who participated in the epidemiological study “Epidemiology of cardiovascular diseases and their risk factors in the Russian Federation”. The analysis using Minnesota code was carried out among men and women of four age groups, two educational levels, among citizens and countrymen.

Results. The highest prevalence was observed in the “Certain” (5,7%) and “Possible signs of CAD” (7,1%) categories, in the “Certain” (3,8%) and “Possible myocardial ischemia” groups (4,9%), the smallest is in the “Rhythm and conduction disorder” (0,7%) and “STT changes in left ventricular hypertrophy” (0,4%) groups. It was shown that the frequency of ECG disorders increases with age, has an sharp increase after 55 years, regardless of sex. In the age dynamics of categories, STT changes and atrial fibrillation have a decrease of gender differences. All groups of ECG disorders are detected more often among men than women, except for STT changes. With an increase in the level of education, the frequency of ECG pathologies decreases, with the exception of the groups of “major” and “minor Q (QS)”, “major rhythm and conduction disorders”. The prevalence of most ECG disorders does not depend on the place of residence. However, signs of major myocardial ischemia in men are more common in country than in the city (3,9% vs. 2,7%, p<0,05).

Conclusion. The results confirm the patterns identified earlier. There is a steady association of ECG data with socio-demographic characteristics.

About the Authors

G. A. Muromtseva
National Medical Research Center for Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation
Moscow
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов не заявляется.


V. G. Vilkov
National Medical Research Center for Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation
Moscow
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов не заявляется.


V. V. Konstantinov
National Medical Research Center for Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation
Moscow
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов не заявляется.


A. D. Deev
National Medical Research Center for Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation
Moscow
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов не заявляется.


E. V. Oshchepkova
National Medical Research Center for Cardiology
Russian Federation
Moscow
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов не заявляется.


O. P. Rotar
Almazov National Medical Research Center
Russian Federation
Saint-Petersburg
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов не заявляется.


S. A. Shalnova
National Medical Research Center for Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation
Moscow
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов не заявляется.


References

1. Shalnova SA, Deev AD, Shestov DB, et al. Prognostic estimation the epidemiological characteristics of coronary heart disease. Cardiology. 1997;9:49-54. (In Russ.)

2. Macfarlane PW. Minnesota coding and the prevalence of ECG abnormalities. Heart. 2000;84:582-584. www.heartjnl.com.

3. Zhang ZM, Prineas RJ, Soliman EZ, et al. and for the ARIC Research Group. Prognostic significance of serial Q/ST-T changes by the Minnesota Code and Novacode in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012;19(6):1430-6. doi:10.1177/1741826711426091.

4. Auer R, Bauer DC, Marques-Vidal P, et al. and Health ABC Study. Association of major and minor ECG abnormalities with coronary heart disease events. JAMA. 2012;307(14):1497- 505. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.434.

5. Eranti A, Aro AL, Kenttӓ T, et al. 12-lead electrocardiogram as a predictor of sudden cardiac death: from epidemiology to clinical practice. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2016 Jul 25;1- 23. doi:10.1080/14017431.2016.1215520.

6. De Bacquer D, De Backer G, Kornitzer M. Prevalence of ECG findings in large population based samples of men and women. Heart. 2000 Dec; 84(6):625-33. doi:10.1136/heart.84.6.625.

7. Tolpyigina SN, Martsevich SYu, Gofman EA, et al. Prognostic value of the results of instrumental methods of research in chronic ischemic heart disease. Data register “PREDICTION of coronary artery disease”. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2014;14(4):35-41. (In Russ.)

8. Ashley EA, Raxwal V, Froelicher V. An evidence-based review of resting electrocardiogram as a screening technique for heart disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2001;44(1):55-67. doi:10.1053/pcad.2001.24683.

9. Mozos I, Caraba A. Electrocardiographic Predictors of Cardiovascular Mortality. Dis Markers. 2015;2015 727401. doi:10.1155/2015/727401.

10. Aro AL, Anttonen O, Tokkanen JT, et al. Intraventricular conduction delay in a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram as a predictor of mortality in the general population. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011 Oct;4(5):704-10. doi:10.1161/circep.111.963561.

11. Rautaharju PM, Soliman EZ. Electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy and the risk of adverse cardiovascular events: a critical appraisal. J Electrocardiol. 2014 SepOct;47(5):649-54. doi:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2014.06.002.

12. van Kleef MEAM, Visseren FLJ, Vernooij JWP, et al. on behalf of the SMART-study group. Four ECG left ventricular hypertrophy criteria and the risk of cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with vascular disease. J Hypertens. 2018 Jun 6;36(1):000-000. doi:10.1097/HJH.0000000000001785.

13. Desai CS, Ning H, Soliman EZ, et al. Electrocardiographic Abnormalities and coronary artery calcium for coronary heart disease prediction and reclassification: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Am Heart J. 2014 Sep;168(3):391-7. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2014.06.009.

14. Vinyoles E, Soldevila N, Torras J, et al Prognostic value of non-specific ST-T changes and left ventricular hypertrophy electrocardiographic criteria in hypertensive patients: 16-year follow-up results from the MINACOR cohort. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders. 2015;15:24. doi:10.1186/s12872-015-0012-6.

15. Akimova EV, Gafarov VV, Trubacheva IA, et al. Coronary heart disease in Siberia: interpopulation differences. Sibirsky Meditsinsky Zhurnal. 2011;26(3),1:153-7. (In Russ.)

16. Maksimov SA, Indukaeva EV, Artamonova GV. Integral assessment of coronary heart disease risk in the epidemiological studies (ESSE-RF in the Kemerovo Region). Communication 1: Age and sex determinants. Profilakticheskaya Medicina. 2015;6:34-9. (In Russ.) doi:10.17116/profmed201518634-39.

17. Evstifeeva SE, Shalnova SA, Deev AD, et al. Risk of diabetes mellitus and its association with socio-demographic and behavioral risk factors in Russian population: data of the ESSERF study. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2017;22(9):13-20. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2017-9-13-20.

18. Zakroeva AG, Andrianova OV, Solodovnikov AG, et al. Comparative analysis of the prevalence of some chronic non-communicable diseases and their risk factors in rural and urban populations of the Middle Urals. Profilakticheskaya Medicina. 2013;16(6):94-102. (In Russ.)

19. Boytsov SA, Chazov EI, Shlyakhto EV, et al. Scientific and the organizing Committee of the ESSERF. Epidemiology of cardiovascular diseases in different regions of Russia (ESSERF), rationale and study design. Profilakticheskaya Medicina. 2013;16(6):25-34. (In Russ.)

20. Prineas RJ, Crow RS, Zhang ZM. The Minnesota Code Manual of Electrocardiographic Findings (Including Measurement and Comparison with the Novacode: Standards and Procedures for Measurement in Epidemiologic and Clinical Trials). 2nd. Springer; London; 2009. p.277-324. ISBN 978-1-84882-777-6. e-ISBN 978-1-84882-778-3. doi:10.1007/978-1-84882-778-3.

21. Oksuzyan A, Shkolnikova M, Vaupel JW, et al. Sex Differences in Biological Markers of Health in the Study of Stress, Aging and Health in Russia. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(6):e0131691. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0131691.

22. Shalnova SA, Deev AD, Kapustina AV, et al. Coronary heart disease in persons aged after 55 years. Prevalence and prognosis. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2014;14(4):21- 8. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1728-8800-2014-4-21-28.

23. Boytsov SA, Balanova JuA., Shalnova SA, et al. on behalf of the ESSE-RF participants. Arterial hypertension of persons aged 25-64 years: prevalence, awareness, treatment and control. According to the ESSE-RF study. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2014;14(4):4-14. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1728-8800-2014-4-4-14.

24. Shalnova SA, Deev AD, Balanova JuA, et al. Dynamics of arterial hypertension in Russia: is there any progress in the appointment of antihypertensive therapy? (results of studies 1993-2013). Heart: journal for practicing physicians. 2015;14(6):389-96. (In Russ.) doi:10.18087/rhj.2015.6.2145.

25. Kontsevaya AV, Mirzamatova AO, Polupanov AG, et al. Ethnic peculiarities of prevalence of the main cardiovascular risk factors among rural residents in the Russian region and the regions of Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2017;22(6):113- 21. (In Russ.) doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2017-6-113-121.

26. Healy CF, Lloyd-Jones DM. Association of Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Factors with Development of Major and Minor Electrocardiographic Abnormalities: A Systematic Review. Cardiol Rev. 2016;24(4):163-9. doi:10.1097/CRD.0000000000000109.


Review

For citations:


Muromtseva G.A., Vilkov V.G., Konstantinov V.V., Deev A.D., Oshchepkova E.V., Rotar O.P., Shalnova S.A. The prevalence of electrocardiographic abnormalities in the Russian population in the early 21st century (the ESSE-RF study). Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2018;(12):7-17. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2018-12-7-17

Views: 1221


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1560-4071 (Print)
ISSN 2618-7620 (Online)