Informed consent to the receipt and use of human cellular material: juristic and ethical regulation
D. V. Stambolsky,
E. V. Bryzgalina,
A. Yu. Efimenko,
K. Yu. Alasania,
E. M. Shkomova,
S. M. Gavrilenko,
T. A. Varkhotov,
S. T. Matskeplishvili https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2018-12-84-91
Abstract
Further progress in medicine is closely related to the clinical introduction of regenerative technologies, including cell therapy. Presented article covers the ethical and legal status of obtaining an informed consent from donors of cell material. The manuscript defines specific functions of such informed consent related to the features of research object and possibilities of its further use. The recommended content of the informed consent from cell material donors is determined in the context of global trends as well as guidelines for obtaining the consent. Existing difficulties and contradictions while developing an informed consent are presented
About the Authors
D. V. Stambolsky
https://istina.msu.ru/profile/DmitryStambolsky/
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Moscow
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов отсутствует.
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Moscow
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов отсутствует.
E. V. Bryzgalina
https://istina.msu.ru/profile/evbryzgalina/
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Moscow
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов отсутствует
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Moscow
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов отсутствует
A. Yu. Efimenko
https://istina.msu.ru/profile/efimenkoan/
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Moscow
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов отсутствует
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Moscow
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов отсутствует
K. Yu. Alasania
https://istina.msu.ru/profile/AlasaniaKY/
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Moscow
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов отсутствует
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Moscow
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов отсутствует
E. M. Shkomova
https://istina.msu.ru/profile/EkaterinaShkomova/
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Moscow
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов отсутствует
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Moscow
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов отсутствует
S. M. Gavrilenko
https://istina.msu.ru/profile/GavrilenkoSM/
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Moscow
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов отсутствует
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Moscow
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов отсутствует
T. A. Varkhotov
https://istina.msu.ru/profile/Taras_Varkhotov/
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Moscow
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов отсутствует
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Moscow
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов отсутствует
S. T. Matskeplishvili
https://istina.msu.ru/profile/simonmats/
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Moscow
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов отсутствует
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Moscow
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов отсутствует
References
1. Solbakk JK, Holm S, Hofmann B. Introduction. In The Ethics of Research Biobanking. Ed. Solbakk JH, Holm S, Hofmann BNY and L.: Springler. 2009; p.xiii-xviii. doi:10.1007/978-0387-93872-1. ISBN 978-1-4899-8274-2.
2. Stetsenko SG. Medical Law: Textbook. Saint-Petersburg: Low Center Press. 2004. 572 p. (In Russ).
3. Degtyarev YuG, Fomin ОYu, Soltanovich AV, Marzelieze S. Informed consent for medical interference: medical and legal aspects. Zdravookhranenie. 2014;2:27-38 (In Russ).
4. Coleman CH, Bouësseau M-C, Reis A. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2008;86(8):578-A. doi:10.2471/BLT.08.055954.
5. Vasileva EE. Institution of voluntary informed consent of the patient for medical intervention in Russian and American Law. Journal of Russian Low. 2004;9:136-41. (In Russ).
6. Filippov YuN, Abaeva OP, Filippov AYu. The history of establishing the voluntary informed consent of the patient in Russia. Medicinskij al’manah. 2013;1(25):11-3. (In Russ).
7. Varkhotov TA, Gavrilenko SM, Stambolsky DV, et al. The Objectives of Social and Humanitarian Support to the Establishment of the National Depository Bank of Biomaterials in Russia. Voprosy filosofii. 2016;3:124-38. (In Russ).
8. Hofmann B, Solbakk JH, Holm S. Consent to Biobank Research: One Size Fits All?. In: Solbakk J, Holm S, Hofmann B. (eds) The Ethics of Research Biobanking. Springer, Boston, MA. 2009. рp3-24. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-93872-1. ISBN 978-0-38793871-4.
9. Scherzinger G, Bobbert M. Evaluation of Research Ethics Committees: Criteria for the Ethical Quality of the Review Process. Accountability in Research. 2017;24:3:152-76. doi:1 0.1080/08989621.2016.1273778
10. Serepkaite J, Valuckiene V, Gefenas E. ‘Mirroring’ the ethics of biobanking: what should we learn from the analysis of consent documents? Science and Engineering Ethics. 2014;20:1079-83. doi:10.1007/s11948-013-9481-0.
11. Strand R. Health Ideologies, Objectivism, and the Common Good: On the Rights of Dissidents. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 2011;20:605-11. doi:0.1017/S096318011100034X.
12. Blasimme A, Moret C, Hurst SA, et al. Informed Consent and the Disclosure of Clinical Results to Research Participants. The American Journal of Bioethics. 2017;17:7:58-60. doi:10.1080/15265161.2017.1328532.
Review
For citations:
Stambolsky D.V., Bryzgalina E.V., Efimenko A.Yu., Alasania K.Yu., Shkomova E.M., Gavrilenko S.M., Varkhotov T.A., Matskeplishvili S.T. Informed consent to the receipt and use of human cellular material: juristic and ethical regulation. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2018;(12):84-90. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2018-12-84-91
Views:
925
Email this article 