CLINICAL CHRACTERISTICS OF PATIENTS AND RESULTS OF CATHETER ABLATION IN ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN RUSSIA: SUBANALYSIS OF THE EUROPEAN REGISTRY 2012-2016
https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2018-7-7-15
Abstract
Aim. The results presented, of subanalysis of the catheter ablation (CA) registry in atrial fibrillation (AF) with the patients properties, specifics of CA and treatment results, in Russia comparing to European countries.
Material and methods. During 2012 to 2015, totally 3742 patients included to the registry, of those 477 in Russia. In 467 Russian patients (males 56,5%; mean age 58,5 y. o.) CA AF was done. During one year 392 patients were followed up. Minimum requirements to follow-up: routine ECG registration and non less than one contact after 12 months passed.
Results. In Russian patients there were more common obesity (46,1% and 29,2%, p<0,001), hypertension heart disease (40,2% and 22,8%, p<0,0001), coronary heart disease (31,7% and 16,2%, p<0,0001), chronic heart failure (67,3% and 13,0%, p<0,0001). In Russia the patients more commonly underwent primary CA (83,5% in Russia and 77,6% in European countries, p<0,05), more rare in Russia the cryoballoon ablation was done (3% and 18%, p<0,05). Generally adverse events were reported more rare in Russia (10,5% and 16,6%, p=0,0007), including cardiovascular adverse events (2,6% and 5,2%, p<0,05). Tachiarrhythmias recurs were diagnosed more rare in Russia, including by the subsutaneous ECG monitors (17% and 1,6% in other countries, р<0,001). Within the year of follow-up, full absence of tachiarrhythmias recurs in Russia was found in 65,8% of patients, in other countries — in 74,7% (р=0,0003).
Conclusion. In real clinical setting, high efficacy of CA AF was shown, resistant to antiarrhythmic therapy. In most of Russian patients there were cardiovascular comorbidities. There was lower rate of reported adverse events in Russian centers of interventional treatments.
About the Authors
E. N. MikhailovRussian Federation
Saint- Petersburg
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов не заявляется
N. Z. Gasymova
Russian Federation
Saint- Petersburg
Competing Interests:
S. А. Bayramova
Russian Federation
Novosibirsk
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов не заявляется
V. E. Kharats
Russian Federation
Tyumen
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов не заяляется
O. N. Kachalkova
Russian Federation
Tyumen
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов не заявляется
A. Yu. Dmitriev
Russian Federation
Krasnoyarsk
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов не заявляется
R. E. Batalov
Russian Federation
Tomsk
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов не заявляется
D. P. Morgunov
Russian Federation
Surgut
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов не заявляется
I. A. Silin
Russian Federation
Surgut
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов не заявляется
A. A. Aleksandrovskiy
Russian Federation
Saransk
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов не заявляется
D. V. Kryzhanovskiy
Russian Federation
Saint-Petersburg
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов не заявляется
A. B. Romanov
Russian Federation
Novosibirsk
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов не заявляется
E. A. Pokushalov
Russian Federation
Novosibirsk
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов не заявляется
D. S. Lebedev
Russian Federation
Saint Petersburg
Competing Interests:
V. A. Kuznetsov
Russian Federation
Tyumen
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов не заявляется
G. V. Kolunin
Russian Federation
Tyumen
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов не заявляется
D. A. Zamanov
Russian Federation
Krasnoyarsk
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов не заявляется
S. Yu. Chetverikov
Russian Federation
Khanty-Mansiysk
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов не заявляется
S. M. Yashin
Russian Federation
Saint-Petersburg
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов не заявляется
S. V. Popov
Russian Federation
Tomsk
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов не заявляется
E. A. Ivanitsky
Russian Federation
Krasnoyarsk
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов не заявляется
A. I. Gorkov
Russian Federation
Surgut
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов не заявляется
S. E. Mamchur
Russian Federation
Kemerovo
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов не заявляется
V. A. Bazaev
Russian Federation
Samara
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов не заявляется
E. V. Shlyakhto
Russian Federation
Saint- Petersburg
Competing Interests: Конфликт интересов не заявляется
References
1. Hakalahti A, Biancari F, Nielsen J, et al. Radiofrequency ablation vs. antiarrhythmic drug therapy as first line treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation: systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace. 2015;17:370-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu376.
2. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. 2016;37,2893-962. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw210.
3. Sulimov VA, Golicyn SP, Panchenko EP, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of atrial fibrillation. Russ J Cardiol. 2013;18(4),S3:5-100. (In Russ.)
4. Arbelo E, Brugada J, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, et al. Contemporary management of patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation: in-hospital and 1-year follow-up findings from the ESC-EHRA atrial fibrillation ablation long-term registry. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:1303-6. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw564.
5. Giuseppe C, Daniele G, Carlo P. The Role of Implantable Cardiac Monitors in Atrial Fibrillation Management. J Atr Fibrillation. 2017;10(2):1590-6. doi:10.4022/jafib.1590.
6. Pathak R, Middeldorp M, Lau D, et al. Aggressive risk factor reduction study for atrial fibrillation and implications for the outcome of ablation: the ARREST-AF cohort study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(21):2222-31. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.028.
7. Wang T, Parise H, Levy D, et al. Obesity and the risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation. JAMA. 2004;292:2471-7. doi:10.1001/jama.292.20.2471.
8. Hsu L, Jais P, Sanders P, et al. Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(23):2373-83. doi:10.1136/bmj.39513.555150.BE.
9. Mikhaylov EN, Gureev SV, Lebedev DS, et al. Additional Left Atrial Septal Line Does Not Improve Outcome Of Patients Undergoing For Ablation Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Acta Cardiologica. 2010;65:153-60. doi:10.2143/AC.65.2.2047048.
10. Mikhaylov EN, Mitrofanova LB, Vander MA, et al. Biatrial tachycardia following linear anterior wall ablation for the perimitral reentry: incidence and electrophysiological evaluations. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26:28-35. doi:10.1111/jce.12543.
11. Михайлов Е. Н., Лебедев Д. С., Покушалов Е. А., и др. Криобаллонная аблация в российских центрах интервенционного лечения фибрилляции предсердий: результаты первого национального опроса. Российский кардиологический журнал. 2015;20(11):86-91. doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2015-11-86-91.
12. Duytschaever M, Demolder A, Phlips T, et al. PulmOnary vein isolation With vs. without continued antiarrhythmic Drug trEatment in subjects with Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation (POWDER AF): results from a multicentre randomized trial. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(16):142937. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx666.
Review
For citations:
Mikhailov E.N., Gasymova N.Z., Bayramova S.А., Kharats V.E., Kachalkova O.N., Dmitriev A.Yu., Batalov R.E., Morgunov D.P., Silin I.A., Aleksandrovskiy A.A., Kryzhanovskiy D.V., Romanov A.B., Pokushalov E.A., Lebedev D.S., Kuznetsov V.A., Kolunin G.V., Zamanov D.A., Chetverikov S.Yu., Yashin S.M., Popov S.V., Ivanitsky E.A., Gorkov A.I., Mamchur S.E., Bazaev V.A., Shlyakhto E.V. CLINICAL CHRACTERISTICS OF PATIENTS AND RESULTS OF CATHETER ABLATION IN ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN RUSSIA: SUBANALYSIS OF THE EUROPEAN REGISTRY 2012-2016. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2018;(7):7-15. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2018-7-7-15