PERCUTANEOUS INTERVENTION IN STABLE ANGINA: WHAT ISSUES DO WE SOLVE?
https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2018-3-7-10
Abstract
In the article, a role of percutaneous intervention discussed in stable ischemic disease of the heart, and an evolution presented of the perspectives on its influence on prognosis and clinical presentation of the disease. The results provided, of recent trials, including the ORBITA. According to current clinical guidelines, endovascular treatment does improve prognosis in patients with the left coronary artery stem lesion and proximal left descending artery lesion, as in a significant area of damaged myocardium involved in temporary ischemia. Percutaneous coronary intervention should be done in patients with continued clinical presentation of angina and nonsatisfactory life quality regardless the optimal medication treatment.
About the Authors
Yu. A. Karpov
National Medical Research Center of Cardiology of the Ministry of Health.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
I. L. Kozlovskaya
National Medical Research Center of Cardiology of the Ministry of Health.
O. S. Bulkina
National Medical Research Center of Cardiology of the Ministry of Health.
V. V. Lopukhova
National Medical Research Center of Cardiology of the Ministry of Health.
References
1. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). European Heart Journal; 2018 (39): 119-77. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393
2. 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation/ American Heart Association/ American College of Physicians/American Association for Thoracic Surgery/ Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association/Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions/Society of Thoracic Surgeons guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with SIHD. Circulation. 2012; 126 (25): e354-471. DOI: 10.1161/ CIR.0b013e318277d6a0.
3. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) Eur Heart J. 2014 1; 35 (37): 2541-619. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278.
4. Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Maron DJ, et al. Investigators C. Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation 2008; 117 (10): 1283-91.
5. Boden WE, O’Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al. Group CTR. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2007; 356 (15): 1503-16.
6. Coronary angioplasty vs. medical therapy for angina: the second Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA-2) trial. RITA-2 trial participants. Lancet 1997; 350 (9076): 461-8.
7. Hueb W, Lopes N, Gersh BJ, et al. Ten-year follow-up survival of the Medicine, Angioplasty, or Surgery Study (MASS II): a randomized controlled clinical trial of 3 therapeutic strategies for multivessel coronary artery disease. Circulation 2010; 122 (10): 949-57. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.911669.
8. Stergiopoulos K, Boden WE, Hartigan P, et al. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes in Patients With Stable Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease and Myocardial Ischemia: A Collaborative Meta-analysis of Contemporary Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174 (2): 232-40. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.12855.
9. Sedlis SP, Hartigan PM, Teo KK, et al. Effect of PCI on long-term survival in patients with stable ischemic heart disease. N Engl J Med. 2015; 373 (20): 1937-46. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1505532.
10. Windecker S, Stortecky S, Stefanini GG, et al. Revascularisation versus medical treatment in patients with stable coronary artery disease: network meta-analysis. BMJ 2014; 348: g3859. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g3859
11. De Bruyne B, Fearon WF, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 1208-15. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408758.
12. Gada H, Kirtane AJ, Kereiakes DJ, et al. Meta-analysis of trials on mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention compared with medical therapy in patients with stable coronary heart disease and objective evidence of myocardial ischemia. Am J Cardiol 2015; 115: 1194-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.01.556
13. Savonitto S, Ardissiono D, Egstrup K, et al. Combination therapy with metoprolol and nifedipine versus monotherapy in patients with stable angina pectoris. Results of the International Multicenter Angina Exercise (IMAGE) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 27: 311-8.
14. Borer JS, Fox K, Jaillon P, for the Ivabradine Investigators Group. Antianginal and antiischemic effects of ivabradine, an I(f) inhibitor, in stable angina: a randomized, doubleblind, multicentered, placebo-controlled trial. Circulation 2003; 107: 817-23.
15. Chaitman BR, Skettino SL, Parker JO, et al. Anti-ischemic effects and long-term survival during ranolazine monotherapy in patients with chronic severe angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 1375-82.
16. Sendón JL, Lee S, Cheng ML, Ben-Yehuda O; CARISA study investigators. Effects of ranolazine on exercise tolerance and angina frequency in patients with severe chronic angina receiving maximally-tolerated background therapy: analysis from the Combination Assessment of Ranolazine In Stable Angina (CARISA) randomized trial. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012; 19: 952-9. DOI: 10.1177/2047487312450133
17. Parisi AF, Folland ED, Hartigan P, for the Veterans Affairs ACME Investigators. A comparison of angioplasty with medical therapy in the treatment of single-vessel coronary artery disease. Veterans Affairs ACME Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1992: 2; 326: 10-6.
18. Erne P, Schoenenberger AW, Burckhardt D, et al. Effects of percutaneous coronary interventions in silent ischemia after myocardial infarction: the SWISSI II randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2007; 297: 1985-91.
19. Al-Lamee R, Thompson D, Dehbi H-M, et al., on behalf of the ORBITA investigators. Percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina (ORBITA): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2018; 391 (10115): 31-40. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32714-9.
20. Brown DL, Redberg RF. Last nail in the coffin for PCI in stable angina? Lancet. 2018 6; 391 (10115): 3-4. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32757-5.
Review
For citations:
Karpov Yu.A., Kozlovskaya I.L., Bulkina O.S., Lopukhova V.V. PERCUTANEOUS INTERVENTION IN STABLE ANGINA: WHAT ISSUES DO WE SOLVE? Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2018;(3):7-10. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2018-3-7-10
Views:
1561
Email this article 