Preview

Russian Journal of Cardiology

Advanced search

METABOLIC EFFECTS OF VARIOUS ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUG COMBINATIONS

Abstract

Aim. To investigate the effects of various antihypertensive combinations on metabolic parameters in patients with arterial hypertension (AH). Material and methods. The study included 144 AH patients and 7 groups of combination therapy: Group 1 (n=30) – trandolapril/verapamil SR; Group 2 (n=19) – perindopril/indapamide; Group 3 (n=15) – felodipine/metoprolol; Group 4 (n=20) – amlodipine/atenolol; Group 5 (n=20) – ACE inhibitor/hydrochlorothiazide (HCT); Group 6 (n=22) – telmisartan/lacidipine; and Group 7 (n=18) – metoprolol/HCT. In all participants, the parameters of lipid, carbohydrate, and purine metabolism were assessed. The effects of antihypertensive combinations on the risk of metabolic disturbances were studied using the factor regression analysis of quantitative and qualitative parameters (factors) as weighted ordered functions. Results. The negative effects on the levels of cholesterol (CH), triglycerides (TG), and glucose were most pronounced for the combination of metoprolol and HCT, while the combination of amlodipine and atenolol demonstrated the weakest negative effects on CH and glucose levels. The levels of CH, TG, and uric acid were affected to the least extent by the combination therapy with ACE inhibitor and HCT, which was also associated with a reduction in glucose levels. The combination of trandolapril and verapamil SR had the largest positive effect on the levels of CH, TG, and uric acid, together with a beneficial effect on glucose levels. The combination therapy with perindopril and indapamide was the most beneficial for the levels of CH and TG, while the felodipine/metoprolol combination had the most pronounced positive effects on TC and glucose levels. The combination of lacidipine and telmisartan was the most beneficial for glucose levels, but negatively affected the levels of uric acid. The perindopril/indapamide combination demonstrated negative effects on glucose levels. The full doses of diuretics and β-blockers negatively affected the levels of TC and glucose, while the full doses of ACE inhibitors benefited these metabolic parameters. Conclusion. The combination of a β-blocker and HCT was the least desirable, in terms of metabolic safety, for the treatment of AH patients. Including ACE inhibitors in the combination therapy demonstrated beneficial metabolic effects. To minimise the pre-existing metabolic disturbances and prevent the negative metabolic effects of diuretics, full doses of ACE inhibitors are required.

 

 

About the Authors

E. E. Alimova
N. I. Pirogov Russian Research Medical University, Moscow
Russian Federation


M. V. Leonova
N. I. Pirogov Russian Research Medical University, Moscow
Russian Federation


Yu. B. Belousov
N. I. Pirogov Russian Research Medical University, Moscow
Russian Federation


References

1. Shalnova S. A., Balanova Yu. A., Konstantinov V. V. et al. Arterial hypertension: prevalence, awareness, anti-hypertensive pharmaceutical treatment, treatment effectiveness in Russian population. Russ J Card 2006; 46:45–50. Russian (Шальнова С. А., Баланова Ю. А., Константинов В. В. и др. Артериальная гипертония: распространенность, осведомленность, прием антигипертензивных препаратов и эффективность лечения среди населения Российской Федерации. Российский кардиологический журнал 2006; 46:45–50).

2. Andrushichina T. B., Morosova I. E. The intesive control of blood pressure: possibilities of the combinel therapy. System Hypertension 2009;2: 22–7. Russian (Андрущицина Т. Б., Морозова Т. Е. Интесивный контроль артериального давления: возможности комбинированной терапии. Системные гипертензии 2009;2: 22–7).

3. Linchak R. M., Shumilova K. M., Zhirova L. G. et al. The efficacy and safe of a fixed combination antihypertensive therapy in hypertensive patients with 1–2-th stages. Consilium-medicum 2006; 8; 9: 70–5. Russian (Линчак Р. М., Шумилова К. М., Жирова Л. Г. и др. Эффективность и безопасность фиксированной комбинированной гипотензивной терапии у больных артериальной гипертензией 1–2-й степени. Consilium-medicum 2006; 8; 9: 70–5).

4. Ostroumova O. D., Stepura O. B., Srednjakov A. V. Combined antihypertensive therapy in the primary prevention of stroke: what are the prospect? Consiliummedicum 2010;12;5: 60–5. Russian (Остроумова О. Д., Степура О. Б., Средняков А. В. Комбинированная антигипертензивная терапия в первичной профилактике инсульта: каковы перспективы? Consilium-medicum 2010;12;5: 60–5).

5. Preobrazhenskij D. V., Stecenko T. I., Vyshinskaja I. D.. Fixed and arbitrary combinations of antihypertensive drugs: what more preferred. Consiliummedicum 2009;11;5: 33–7. Russian (Преображенский Д. В., Стеценко Т. И., Вышинская И. Д. Фиксированные и произвольные комбинации антигипертензивных препаратов: какие более предпочтительные.Consilium-medicum. 2009;11;5: 33–7).

6. Chazova I. E., Ratova L. G. The combination therapy in patients with arte. System Hypertension 2010; 2:6–10. Russian (Чазова И. Е., Ратова Л. Г. Комбинированная терапия у пациентов с артериальной гипертонией. Системные гипертензии 2010; 2:6–10).

7. Scheen A. J. Drug metabolic syndrome. Mets insight 2007; 10:9–11.

8. Ernsberger P., Koletsky R. J. Metabolic effects of antihypertensive agents: role of sympathoadrenal and renin-angiotensin systems. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 2006; 373 (4): 245–58.

9. Leonova M. V., Belousov J. B., Shteinberg L. L. et al. The results of pharma-coepidemiological study of arterial hypertension PIFAGOR III. System Hypertension 2010; 2:33–9. Russian (Леонова М. В., Белоусов Ю. Б., Штейнберг Л. Л., Галицкий А. А. Результаты фармако-эпидемиологического исследования артериальной гипертонии ПИФАГОР III (опрос пациентов с АГ). Системные гипертензии 2010; 2:33–9).

10. Alimova E. E., Leonova M. V., Belousov Ju. B. Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of antihypertensive and metabolic safety of combined antihypertensive therapy. Clinical pharmacology & therapy. Proceedings of the conference with international participation «Achievements of clinical pharmacology in Russia» 2009; 6 supp:123–4. Russian (Алимова Э. Э., Леонова М. В., Белоусов Ю. Б. Сравнительная оценка гипотензивной эффек-тивности и метаболической безопасности комбинированной антигипертензивной терапии. Клиническая фармакология и терапия. Материалы научно-практической конференции с международным участием «Достижения клинической фармакологии в России» 2009; 6 дополнительный:123–4).

11. Scientific session of the MIFI – 2001, collection of scientific papers. Научная сессия МИФИ – 2001. Том 1: 162–3).

12. Leonova M. V. Comparative efficacy of modern antihypertensive drugs in patients with hypertension. Diss. Dr. med.on competition. M.,1998. Russian (Леонова М. В. Сравнительная эффективность современных гипотензивных препаратов у больных с артериальной гипертонией. Дисс. на соискание доктора мед.наук. М., 1998).


Review

For citations:


Alimova E.E., Leonova M.V., Belousov Yu.B. METABOLIC EFFECTS OF VARIOUS ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUG COMBINATIONS. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2012;(6):72-77. (In Russ.)

Views: 748


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1560-4071 (Print)
ISSN 2618-7620 (Online)