COMBINATION THERAPY WITH ATENOLOL AND AMLODIPINE AND CORRECTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR AUTONOMIC DYSFUNCTION IN PATIENTS WITH ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION
Abstract
Aim. To assess the effects of the combination therapy with atenolol and amlodipine on the synchronisation of 0,1-Hz rhythms of heart rate variability (HRV) and distal vessel filling (DVF). Material and methods. The study included 25 patients with Stage 1–2 arterial hypertension (AH), aged 58±8 years. The registration of 0,1-Hz oscillations in HRV and DVF was performed during the passive tilt test with spontaneous breathing; each test stage lasted for 10 minutes. Synchronisation was assessed by the phase difference between 0.1 Hz-rhythms in HRV and DVF. Frequency values of the HRV spectrum in LF and HF-ranges were also assessed. The duration of combination therapy was 8 weeks. Results. In patients with AH and a markedly manifested autonomic dysfunction, the therapy with atenolol and amlodipine was associated with some improvement in the functional interaction between HRV and DVF 0,1-Hz rhythms. In the rest of AH patients, the treatment was linked to stable levels of cardiac 0,1-Hz regulation and slightly decreased synchronisation levels. All participants demonstrated an increase in the influence of respiratory parasympathetic effects. Conclusion. The combination therapy with atenolol and amlodipine effectively corrected autonomic cardiovascular dysfunction in patients with Stage 1–2 AH.
About the Authors
A. R. KiselevRussian Federation
V. I. Gridnev
Russian Federation
A. S. Karavaev
Russian Federation
O. M. Posnenkova
Russian Federation
V. A. Shvartz
Russian Federation
V. I. Ponomarenko
Russian Federation
M. D. Prokhorov
Russian Federation
B. P. Bezruchko
Russian Federation
References
1. Julien C. The enigma of Mayer waves: facts and models. Cardiovasc Res 2006; 70: 12–21.
2. Morris K. F., Nuding S. C., Segers L. S. et al. Respiratory and Mayer wave-related discharge patterns of raphe and pontine neurons change with vagotomy. J Appl Physiol 2010; 109 (1): 189–202.
3. Finucane C., Boyle G., Fan C. W. et al. Mayer wave activity in vasodepressor carotid sinus hypersensitivity. Europace 2010; 12 (2): 247–53.
4. Kember G., Armour J. A., Zamir M. Neural control of heart rate: the role of neuronal networking. J Theor Biol 2011; 277 (1): 41–47.
5. Kiselev A. R., Bespyatov A. B., Posnenkova O. M. et al. Internal Synchronization of the Main 0.1-Hz Rhythms in the Autonomic Control of the Cardiovascular System. Human Physiology 2007; 33 (2): 188–93.
6. VNOK guidlines. Arterial hypertension. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention 2008; 7
7. (6), Suppl. 2 (Рекомендации ВНОК по профилактике, диагностике и лечению артериальной гипертензии, 2008 г. Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика 2008; 7 (6), Приложение 2).
8. Kiselev A. R., Gridnev V. I., Posnenkova O. M. et al. Assessment of dynamics of the autonomic cardiovascular system regulation based on low-frequency rhythm synchronization in patients with ischemic heart diseases complicated by myocardial infarction treated with metoprolol. Ter Arkh 2007; 79 (4): 23–31. Russian (А. Р. Киселев, В. И. Гриднев, О. М. Посненкова и др. Оценка на основе определения синхронизации низкочастотных ритмов динамики вегетативной регуляции сердечно-сосудистой системы при применении метопролола у больных ИБС, перенесших инфаркт миокарда. Терапевтический архив 2007; 79 (4): 23–31).
9. Pavithran P., Prakash E. S., Dutta T. K. et al. Effect of antihypertensive drug therapy on short-term heart rate variability in newly diagnosed essential hypertension. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2010; 37 (2): e107–13.
10. Rabbia F., Silke B., Carra R. et al. Heart Rate Variability and Baroreflex Sensitivity during Fosinopril, Irbesartan and Atenolol Therapy in Hypertension. Clin Drug Investig 2004; 24 (11): 651–659.
11. Chiladakis J. A., Georgiopoulou E., Alexopoulos D. Autonomic effects of nebivolol versus atenolol in healthy subjects. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2004; 18 (6): 469–473.
12. Chern C. M., Hsu H. Y., Hu H. H. et al. Effects of atenolol and losartan on baroreflex sensitivity and heart rate variability in uncomplicated essential hypertension. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2006; 47 (2): 169–174.
13. Kiselev A. R., Gridnev V. I., Karavaev A. S. et al. Comparison of fosinopril and atenolol effect on heart 0.1 Hz-rhythms synchronization and blood microcirculation in patients with arterial hypertension. Rational Pharmacother Card 2010; 6 (6): 803–811 (А. Р. Киселев, В. И. Гриднев, А. С. Караваев и др. Сравнительная оценка влияния фозиноприла и атенолола на синхронизацию колебаний с частотой около 0,1 Гц в ритме сердца и микроциркуляции крови у больных артериальной гипертонией. Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии 2010; 6 (6): 803–811).
Review
For citations:
Kiselev A.R., Gridnev V.I., Karavaev A.S., Posnenkova O.M., Shvartz V.A., Ponomarenko V.I., Prokhorov M.D., Bezruchko B.P. COMBINATION THERAPY WITH ATENOLOL AND AMLODIPINE AND CORRECTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR AUTONOMIC DYSFUNCTION IN PATIENTS WITH ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2012;(6):66-71. (In Russ.)